Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,861
- 90,686
- 3,635
Spin it any way you want, Hitlery Nut Nuzzler.
she tried to launder the money thru them.
LOL
I spun nothing, Dumbfuck. I literally quoted the actual complaint.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spin it any way you want, Hitlery Nut Nuzzler.
she tried to launder the money thru them.
He never classified it as opposition research.Is there a difference in reporting opposition research as legal fee and paying off the Hooker you boinked to be quite about it and classifying that a opposition research.
Guess not in the Neo-GOP land. The Dirty Don could murder somebody on 5th Avenue and the Neo-Bunch would complain if he got indicted for a crime.
But it isnt illegal.Oh lord...8th thread on this topic.
Opposition research is what all campaigns do; Using campaign funds for it, negative TV ads, etc... is campaigning 101. Using the money to pay hush money to a porn star is in no way the same thing.
Keep slurping Hitlery’s nuts.LOL
I spun nothing, Dumbfuck. I literally quoted the actual complaint.
Keep slurping Hitlery’s nuts.
Fuck, my bad, legal fees.......Trump classified paying his whore as legal fees.......He never classified it as opposition research.
I am amazed how people can give a pass to those they like and refuse to give a pass to those the dont.
But hey....if you are happy about NYS spending taxpayer money for a political witch hunt, then you are a [pathetic individual.
Thanks for finally admitting she didn't hire a British agent.
You are a true brainless retard. She used the law firm as a "cut out". Look up the term you twat.
Sure there is. Campaign finance law violations are campaign finance law violations. Just because one might be a porn star payoff and another something different, they are both campaign finance law violations. But, we do have a precedent where John Edwards was playing loose with campaign finance law violations regarding payments to women, the DOJ themselves decided not to pursue the case. So, makes me wonder why the state of New York thinks they can arrest someone for something the DOJ had previously decided to let go when it was a Democrat.Nothing remotely similar in the two cases.
Yeah, she paid a U.S. firm. That's why she was never charged with a crime for hiring a foreign national.
Sucks to be you.
No, she wasn't charged because the legal system is corrupt as hell.
The time is approaching very fast where everyone is going to ignore the laws of this land.
That's what happens when corruption is this pervasive.
How do you pardon someone who had the charges dropped dumbfuck
You should save that for you, dumbass. You are the ones who're going to suffer the most.
Judge dismissed the case on December 8, 2020. Trump granted him a pardon on November 25, 2020.You can't be pardon if the judges dismissed the case
View attachment 767498
Judge dismissed the case on December 8, 2020. Trump granted him a pardon on November 25, 2020.
Judge formally dismisses Michael Flynn case after Trump pardon
Judge Emmet Sullivan of the DC District Court on Tuesday dismissed Michael Flynn's criminal case as moot, following Flynn's pardon by President Donald Trump, ending a tortured three-year-long proceeding.www.cnn.com
Judge dismisses Flynn case AFTER presidential pardon. Ready to admit you were wrong? I doubt it.
Not a fantasy. You do it daily.That's quite the bizarre fantasy life you lead there, Dumbfuck.
Hitlery is good at laundering money for her criminal schemes.Yeah, she paid a U.S. firm. That's why she was never charged with a crime for hiring a foreign national.
Sucks to be you.
Not a fantasy. You do it daily.