Hillary violated federal election law

[Delldude]

Odd then how he made arresting her such a large part of his campaign.

Much like Biden, 'eh?

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump had the opportunity to have investigated all of this and upheld a campaign pledge to charge her.

He would have easily had the goods. He was too busy calling people names on Twitter.

You are boring.

 

[Billiejeens]

Do you mean that he had the opportunity to engage in lawfare against his political opponents but didn't do it?

He's above that.

 

[eagle7-31]

Democrat.

Protected.

Nothing will happen.

Carry on.

100 percent correct.

 

[MisterBeale]

No. He used to hit that. He liked dat ass too much.

 

[dudmuck]

MSN

Story by Randy DeSoto
The Washington D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign and an affiliated super PAC violated federal election law in spending that totaled close to $6 million.

The amount in question is more than 45 times the $130,000 a Manhattan court convicted former President Donald Trump of misreporting in business records during the same 2016 campaign.

In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.

Comment:
Wow it took 7 years for the wheels of justice to turn.
Hillary doesn't care.
The crazy Left Wingers don't care.

this is what actually occurred --> it was the FEC's fault. The FEC erred by stretching statutory exemptions for internet spending “beyond lawful limits”.

Clinton Campaign Case to Prompt Review of Disclosure Exemption

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and a pro-Clinton political action committee must face claims they failed to properly disclose millions in expenditures, a D.C. Circuit panel ruled.

news.bloomberglaw.com

 

[Delldude]

this is what actually occurred --> it was the FEC's fault. The FEC erred by stretching statutory exemptions for internet spending “beyond lawful limits”.

Clinton Campaign Case to Prompt Review of Disclosure Exemption

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and a pro-Clinton political action committee must face claims they failed to properly disclose millions in expenditures, a D.C. Circuit panel ruled.

news.bloomberglaw.com

It's all in the OP.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Trump had the opportunity to have investigated all of this and upheld a campaign pledge to charge her.

He would have easily had the goods. He was too busy calling people names on Twitter.

No, he was following the pattern set by all presidents since the founding of the nation of NOT using the law to attack his political opponents.

 

[pknopp]

No, he was following the pattern set by all presidents since the founding of the nation of NOT using the law to attack his political opponents.

And I for one am glad to see that broken.

 

[Delldude]

And I for one am glad to see that broken.

Looks like it ain't working too well.

6-3

 

[Doc7505]

MSN

Story by Randy DeSoto
The Washington D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign and an affiliated super PAC violated federal election law in spending that totaled close to $6 million.

The amount in question is more than 45 times the $130,000 a Manhattan court convicted former President Donald Trump of misreporting in business records during the same 2016 campaign.

In a separate matter, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee agreed in 2022 to pay $113,000 to settle an FEC investigation into alleged violations of campaign finance law in relation to funding the infamous Steele dossier during the 2016 race, according to the Associated Press.

Comment:
Wow it took 7 years for the wheels of justice to turn.
Hillary doesn't care.
The crazy Left Wingers don't care.

~~~~~~

Hilary Clinton COULD FACE JAIL TIME for $6 Million FEC Violation?​

–​

45x Bigger Than Trump’s​

Hilary Clinton COULD FACE JAIL TIME for $6 Million FEC Violation? - 45x Bigger Than Trump’s | Elijah Schaffer’s Top 5 (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Elijah Schaffer

Welcome to The Gateway Pundit’s Week-in-Review with Elijah Schaffer, where he covers the top 5 stories throughout the week in around 10 minutes.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Commentary:
Surely Letitia James and Alvin Bragg are working hard on this case....
Remember Comey said. "No reasonable 'Democrat' prosecutor would charge her."
We know that HRC Violated more than 20 Federal laws with her illegal server, classified documents, and destroying the evidence. Then she got away with kicking off Russia Russia and Crossfire Hurricane coup attempts against Trump as revenge for losing the election.
What makes anyone think this Meo-Marxist Fascist criminal psychopath will ever see the inside of a prison cell while protected by the Swamp she helps oversee?
Unfortunately, Americans know HRC won't face any accountability. They will find a way to send the case to a court that is a funded Democrat, at the end of the day all the charges will disappear like magic. The only way she will face accountability is when she meets the angel of death and is judged in the afterlife.
Just one more example of the Two Tiered system of Justice in America. ....

 

[dudmuck]

It's all in the OP.

your OP is from a questionable far right source.

this is what actually occurred --> it was the FEC's fault. The FEC erred by stretching statutory exemptions for internet spending “beyond lawful limits”.

 

[Delldude]

your OP is from a questionable far right source.

Not my OP.

this is what actually occurred --> it was the FEC's fault. The FEC erred by stretching statutory exemptions for internet spending “beyond lawful limits”.

It's all in 'The Questionable Source' quoted by MSN news...................

 

[Lastamender]

Odd then how he made arresting her such a large part of his campaign.

All the same, don't complain now.

No it is not the same two of Trumps advisors are in jail.