BREAKING: Dominion did not appear before their Senate hearings. Ruh Roh Raggy

  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
Dominion Voting System Representatives Failed To Show Up For Pennsylvania Hearing

img_8082-1200x1426.jpg
 
Dominion Voting System Representatives Failed To Show Up For Pennsylvania Hearing

img_8082-1200x1426.jpg
So you contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they have to be guilty?
 
The dominion CEO bails out of Pennsylvania hearing to what was to give perspective on their software in the process they use in determining a fair election through their platform.


Because innocent people always run away from a hearing, right?

Sounds like Guilt by omission there.

If they had nothing to hide, they should of come forward and presented their case...
 
Last edited:
 
Dominion Voting System Representatives Failed To Show Up For Pennsylvania Hearing

img_8082-1200x1426.jpg
So you contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they have to be guilty?
I think the precedence for President to not put certain people up for interrogation started here....
Eric Holder Is Defying the Law by Resisting Subpoena | Debate Club | US News
 
Wow, so the very people who are the crooks, you believe what they say? No wonder you are such a slave...
 


I diddn due nuffin.
 
Dominion Voting System Representatives Failed To Show Up For Pennsylvania Hearing

img_8082-1200x1426.jpg
So you contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they have to be guilty?
I think the precedence for President to not put certain people up for interrogation started here....
Eric Holder Is Defying the Law by Resisting Subpoena | Debate Club | US News
Ah, so when a president doesn't allow the execution of a subpoena it's not because he's hiding something? When a company refuses to appear voluntarily it is?
 
The dominion CEO bails out of Pennsylvania hearing to what was to give perspective on their software in the process they use in determining a fair election through their platform.

Because innocent people always run away from a hearing, right?
Sounds like Guild by omission there. If they had nothing to hide, they should of come forward and presented their case.
If Trump's spokesperson had info on voting fraud, why did she refuse to tell Tucker Carlson about it? Well, she didn't have to and neither does Dominion. Why are you concerned about them, but give Trump's people a pass when they say there's fraud, but offer no evidence.
 
Dominion Voting System Representatives Failed To Show Up For Pennsylvania Hearing

img_8082-1200x1426.jpg
So you contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they have to be guilty?
I think the precedence for President to not put certain people up for interrogation started here....
Eric Holder Is Defying the Law by Resisting Subpoena | Debate Club | US News
Ah, so when a president doesn't allow the execution of a subpoena it's not because he's hiding something? When a company refuses to appear voluntarily it is?
Are you saying that Obama, protecting Eric Holder who allowed 10,000 mexicans and 1 US border agent to be murdered by guns Eric allowed the Mexican Cartel to purchase, was he trying to hide something?
 
The dominion CEO bails out of Pennsylvania hearing to what was to give perspective on their software in the process they use in determining a fair election through their platform.

Because innocent people always run away from a hearing, right?
Sounds like Guild by omission there. If they had nothing to hide, they should of come forward and presented their case.
If Trump's spokesperson had info on voting fraud, why did she refuse to tell Tucker Carlson about it? Well, she didn't have to and neither does Dominion. Why are you concerned about them, but give Trump's people a pass when they say there's fraud, but offer no evidence.

I guess you never have been to a trial have you?
 
So you contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they have to be guilty?

I contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they are more likely guilty than not
D.C. Circuit panel allows Don McGahn to ignore a Congressional subpoena. (slate.com)
So likely guilty.

John Gore, a top official in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, openly refused to comply with a congressional subpoena to testify about the Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
Likely guilty.

On May 2, the day after his withering appearance at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Barr refused to appear at a scheduled hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.
Likely guilty.

House Ways & Means Committee chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) on April 3 ordered Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and the Internal Revenue Service to provide him with Trump’s tax returns for the years 2013-2018 under a law allowing the panel to obtain anyone’s taxes.
Likely guilty.

The House Oversight and Reform Committee subpoenaed former White House personnel director Carl Kline on April 2 as part of an investigation into how several White House officials received security clearances over the objections of career security professionals.
Likely guilty.

Trump sued the Oversight Committee on April 22 to prevent it from receiving the documents from Mazars. The president also sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One on April 30 to keep them from handing records to Congress.
Likely guilty.

The House Oversight Committee and the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee have repeatedly requested information from the General Services Administration about Trump’s controversial Washington hotel that operates out of the GSA-owned Old Post Office building.
Likely guilty.

The House Oversight Committee on April 17 asked White House adviser Stephen Miller to testify about the administration’s reshuffling of immigration enforcement officials. The White House declined to allow Miller to testify, citing “long-standing precedent” against White House staff appearing before congressional committees.
likely guilty.


Sure you want to persist at your contention?
 
The dominion CEO bails out of Pennsylvania hearing to what was to give perspective on their software in the process they use in determining a fair election through their platform.


Because innocent people always run away from a hearing, right?

So, why did all the tRumplings ignore subpoenas?
 
Dominion Voting System Representatives Failed To Show Up For Pennsylvania Hearing

img_8082-1200x1426.jpg
So you contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they have to be guilty?
I think the precedence for President to not put certain people up for interrogation started here....
Eric Holder Is Defying the Law by Resisting Subpoena | Debate Club | US News
Ah, so when a president doesn't allow the execution of a subpoena it's not because he's hiding something? When a company refuses to appear voluntarily it is?
Are you saying that Obama, protecting Eric Holder who allowed 10,000 mexicans and 1 US border agent to be murdered by guns Eric allowed the Mexican Cartel to purchase, was he trying to hide something?
I'm not the one trying to claim that not appearing before a house hearing implies guilt. That's what the OP is claiming
 
The dominion CEO bails out of Pennsylvania hearing to what was to give perspective on their software in the process they use in determining a fair election through their platform.


Because innocent people always run away from a hearing, right?

Sounds like Guild by omission there.

If they had nothing to hide, they should of come forward and presented their case...

Just like tRump had all of his people do when they were subpoenaed?
 
Dominion Voting System Representatives Failed To Show Up For Pennsylvania Hearing

img_8082-1200x1426.jpg
So you contend that when someone refuses to appear before a House hearing they have to be guilty?
I think the precedence for President to not put certain people up for interrogation started here....
Eric Holder Is Defying the Law by Resisting Subpoena | Debate Club | US News
Ah, so when a president doesn't allow the execution of a subpoena it's not because he's hiding something? When a company refuses to appear voluntarily it is?
Are you saying that Obama, protecting Eric Holder who allowed 10,000 mexicans and 1 US border agent to be murdered by guns Eric allowed the Mexican Cartel to purchase, was he trying to hide something?
I'm not the one trying to claim that not appearing before a house hearing implies guilt. That's what the OP is claiming
If the company doesnt have anything to hide, why wouldnt they step forward and present their evidence. We know Eric Holder murdered all those people, but by executive privilege, the kin of those murdered never got any justice, sorta like Governor Andrew Cujo who murdered 10s of thousands of elderly and then by his EO, granted himself immunity from prosecution. You progs sure do like to murder, burn , loot and steal...
 

Forum List

Back
Top