If the GOP is so pro civil-rights then why were they practically absent for that recent commemorate march in Selma?
FAIL!
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
They were there when it actually meant something...when they were being shot at and killed by democrats in the Civil War....close to 250,000 died freeing the slaves....and then after the war the Republicans were there shedding blood again to protect the newly freed slaves from the racist democrat kkk and their politial allies.....and passing the civil rights acts that protected the rights of blacks when the democrats used bombs, night sticks, fire hoses and lynching to keep blacks down...
So after all the real work is done...is it odd that now the democrats walked across that bridge....? Considering they were the ones beating people the first time around....
Why not show their moral support for the cause you claim they got beaten with sticks for? It surely couldn't hurt.
I await your answer.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
The republican party deserved to be there, the democrat party definitely should have been there to apologize for what members of their party did to the original marchers....why more republicans didn't go...probably they are so used to being lied about their intentions that they didn't want it to detract from the event....the democrats in the media smear the actual party of Civil Rights, the republicans every chance they get...and being politicians they take the path of least resistance,when they should be calling out the democrats for the racists they are....
In fact, Tuesday, Retired Colonel Allen West did just that...he was on the Dan and Amy radio show here in Chicago and called that flag the democrat flag and brought up the racist history of the democrat party......the history of slavery, jim crow and the kkk......but republican leadership today is filled with guys too used to living in D.C.
We need more Allen Wests......