Bragg has still not specified the underlying crime that resurrected dead misdemeanors.

[Crepitus]

If it is too complex perhaps this is an indication that they are reaching.

Or that the RWNJ base isn't all that bright.

 

[Marener]

Nope what is the specific crime
County can't charge for federal crimes.
The FEC didn't go after trump.
So once again what is the specific crime that made a misdemeanor into a felony?

They don’t have to charge the object crime. They don’t even have to prove it happened beyond a reasonable doubt.

All they have to prove is that Trump intended to commit another crime.

Sorry this is too complicated for you to understand.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Either that or they are pretending to be stupid.

Hard to tell sometimes.

What's the specific crime committed that made a misdemeanor into a felony?

 

[Marener]

They have to state one, and prove it. Hypotheticals don’t fly in real courtrooms.

Wrong.

 

[Marener]

Either that or they are pretending to be stupid.

Hard to tell sometimes.

It’s not entirely their fault. Their media keeps them ignorant.

Of course there is no real excuse to avoid all the better and more informative media out there, but they’re really too afraid to do so.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They don’t have to charge the object crime. They don’t even have to prove it happened beyond a reasonable doubt.

All they have to prove is that Trump intended to commit another crime.

Sorry this is too complicated for you to understand.

Who is the they? The trey do not have jurisdiction to charge federal crimes. The they can't make a misdemeanor into a felony without a secondary underlying crime.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Wrong.

Yes Bragg does. He must do it so the defense can make a defense for the accused. You dumb fuck.

 

[Marener]

Who is the they? The trey do not have jurisdiction to charge federal crimes. The they can't make a misdemeanor into a felony without a secondary underlying crime.

The prosecution, obviously.

They do not have to charge the underlying crime. They don’t have to prove the underlying crime.

All they have to do is prove that Trump intended to prove another crime.

 

[Marener]

Yes Bragg does. He must do it so the defense can make a defense for the accused. You dumb fuck.

Wrong.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Wrong.

So the accused isn't suppose to make a defense against his accuser's? You're really full of shit.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The prosecution, obviously.

They do not have to charge the underlying crime. They don’t have to prove the underlying crime.

All they have to do is prove that Trump intended to prove another crime.

The prosecution has no federal jurisdiction

 

[Marener]

So the accused isn't suppose to make a defense against his accuser's? You're really full of shit.

The defense is perfectly able to make their defense, dipshit.

 

[Marener]

The prosecution has no federal jurisdiction

They’re not prosecuting federal crimes dipshit.

I told you this was too complicated for you morons.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The defense is perfectly able to make their defense, dipshit.

Not true dumbass if they don't know what they are defending against

 

[Marener]

Not true dumbass if they don't know what they are defending against

They’re defending against the crime of falsifying business documents.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They’re not prosecuting federal crimes dipshit.

I told you this was too complicated for you morons.

Dumbass you are the one that suggested it was one of the possible charges against trump

Three possibilities.

Federal campaign finance violation
State campaign laws
State tax violation

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They’re defending against the crime of falsifying business documents.

That's a misdemeanor try again. Without a secondary crime to make it a felony Bragg has nothing

 

[Marener]

Dumbass you are the one that suggested it was one of the possible charges against trump

I didn’t say it was of the “charges” against Trump. It was one of the potential object crimes necessary to satisfy the actual charged crime, falsification of business records.

 

[Marener]

That's a misdemeanor try again. Without a secondary crime to make it a felony Bragg has nothing

All they have to prove is he intended to commit a “secondary crime”.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I didn’t say it was of the “charges” against Trump. It was one of the potential object crimes necessary to satisfy the actual charged crime, falsification of business records.

You suggested
Three possibilities.

Federal campaign finance violation