Who Invented the "genocide" lie and why?

Thethingsz

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2025
Messages
958
Reaction score
680
Points
873
Here is my comment:

The poster is right that the main culprit are those that push the lie, however, not all who tend to 'believe" it are really innocent.
Deep down most know it's a bluff.


_


WHO INVENTED THE GENOCIDE LIE — AND WHY?
The make-believe “Palestinian genocide” has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them. Quite the opposite.
Pat's BEATEN WITH A SHTICK.
May 04, 2026

It’s a lie. But why?

I don’t invoke Nazis very often. That history is so massive and horrific, its lessons so sacred, that to flippantly throw around accusations of, or comparison with, Naziism is to defile the memory of the victims. Of course, that does not stop those who equate everything they don’t like with Hitler.

That’s bad enough.

Far, far worse, is the Holocaust inversion that has become routine in the world today: the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

To casually toss around Nazi analogies is to defile a people’s history. To go a step further and calculatingly invert that history and project onto the victims the crimes that were perpetrated on their people is a mindboggling depth of sadistic inhumanity.

That it comes mostly from people who sanctimoniously claim the flag of antiracism, humanitarianism, and wokeness heaps the salt of audacity on the wound of atrocity.

However despicable this phenomenon, it succeeds in minimizing Jewish history and experience with genocide. So, when I am moved to make a relevant comparison with that past, the power is diminished, because this history has been negligently thrown around so habitually. Which is precisely the point.

Abuse of Holocaust memory plays multiple roles in the current discourse.

It diminishes the history itself, reducing Jewish experiences with discrimination — which are undeniably among the worst in human history — to mundane misfortune. It implies that Jews overreact about past traumas, which means we can ignore their pleas for contemporary tolerance and warnings about deteriorating social climates. It assumes that Jews exploit their history for political gain — and defiantly asserts that two can play at that game. Further, if Jewish fears are really just an overreaction, there is no justification for Israel as a refuge for imperiled Jews. Moreover, it flattens unique Jewish experiences into an indifferent “all people have suffered” equivalency.

Strategically, it inverts victim and perpetrator, neutralizing sympathy for Jews by asserting that they are no better than Nazis.

Not to be overlooked, this tactic also emotionally terrorizes Jews, which is an undeniable reward for the ostensible human rights defenders who behave in this way. Sadism is a massive and unexplored factor in this “dialogue.”

But there is something far more perilous in this Holocaust inversion.

Some of the people engaged in this defilement of Holocaust history do so with a very specific end goal.

A quick history lesson will illustrate …

Before the Holocaust, Jews made up about 1% of the German population. Despite this infinitesimally small number, Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as having enormous, sinister power — a “1%” supposedly controlling or corrupting the “99%.” Rather than undermining the propaganda, the numerical differential was itself proof. So much power for such small numbers!

Nazis blamed Jews for everything negative and portrayed them as the embodiment of evil and disaster. They blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in the First World War, for the Treaty of Versailles, for inflation, unemployment, communism, capitalism, liberalism, modern art, sexual “degeneracy,” and the alleged weakening of German culture.

Jews were useful scapegoats: instead of addressing the root causes of economic collapse, political failure, militarism, or class conflict, Nazis offered one simple enemy.

Naziism took historical antisemitism and supercharged it. Traditionally, whatever was Jewish was considered evil. More than ever before, under the Nazis, that equation inverted. Whatever was evil was cast as distinctively Jewish.

That framing justified the atrocities to come. Boycotts, firings, professional bans, public humiliation, and legal discrimination. Random beatings and coordinated, systemic violence. Segregation. Dispossession. Deportation. Mass murder with the goal of complete genocide.

Now …

The world today is a tragic mess. Even if the world were not already filled with conflict, inequality, tragedy, horrors and sadism, the advent of new technologies in the past couple of decades would bombard us with the worst images and news imaginable. Sadly, the news is overwhelmingly conflictual, tragic, horrific, the perpetrators of inequality and injustice demonstrating depths of sadism rarely seen. Social media and inescapable 24/7 news and commentary magnify that awfulness.

It all seems so hopeless. What can one person do? There are no easy answers.

And yet, it is at times like these that easy answers are most in demand.

And there is always someone ready to meet that demand.

This is why the “pro-Palestinian” movement has succeeded so wildly. In a world filled with incomprehensibly complex tragedies, this one conflict (which is comparatively minor, in terms of casualties among global flashpoints today) serves to concentrate global attention.

Just as the Nazis projected onto Jews every sin, real or imagined, facing the German people, the “pro-Palestinian” movement projects onto Israel every sin (real or imagined) of today’s world: inequality, injustice, racism, imperialism, greed, nationalism, tribalism … it is a catch-all for whatever one loathes. If the puzzle piece doesn’t fit the picture, the Goebbelses of the Palestinian narrative will hammer it until it does.

The Nazis blamed Jews for the worst sins they could conjure.

The Palestinian narrative blames Israel for the worst imaginable sins — except there’s a twist.

The Nazis mainstreamed genocide as a political imperative.

Since 1945, this has been recognized as the greatest crime humankind has ever invented.

And so, of course, it had to be that this greatest crime would soon come to be projected onto Jews.

Despite all evidence, much of the world contends that Palestinians are experiencing “genocide.”

This has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them.

It is a make-believe crime invented to frame the Jewish state.

No evidence required.

All evidence to the contrary discarded.

Returning to the lessons of the past, some of the Germans who fell for this propaganda were, in a sense, victims themselves, brainwashed into believing the worst about Jews.

Some of the “pro-Palestinians” who swallow the “Palestinian genocide” Kool-Aid today are likewise victims of a sort, having ignorantly succumbed to one of history’s biggest and most dangerous lies.

But the instigators of the libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are building a case against Jews — Israelis, yes, but Jews generally, since the polite distinctions the more politically savvy Israel-bashers make are irrelevant to those who invented the strategy.

They are creating a scenario in which Jews are widely accepted as perpetrators of civilization’s greatest evil.

Genocide.

In the interest of preventing a repetition of such atrocities — and in the most convoluted (im)moral inversion imaginable, it is the very lessons of Jewish genocide that are often invoked as justification — Israel is denounced as the agent of the greatest evil.

Many of the people who succumb to this outrageous lie are, in a sense, victims, like the Germans before them who fell for hate propaganda.

But those who invented and do the most to perpetuate the genocide libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are pinning a fake genocide on the Jews in order to “solve” the imaginary genocide by planning a real one.

The prevalent anti-Israel slogan says it all: “By any means necessary.”

They will spread the vicious lie that Jews are perpetrating the worst crime imaginable in order to foment that very crime — genocide — against Jews.

It seems incredible.

But this precise blueprint has been used before. With tremendous success.

 
output_meme_20260505_024954_user_sdb7xyvnm_a44b5b57.webp
output_meme_20260505_024954_user_sdb7xyvnm_1d4b624f.webp
 
Folks often confuse ethnic cleansing and genocide. A member of the current Israeli government admits their goal is ethnic cleansing.

1777952281523.webp



 
Every day Israeli monsters slaughter people in Lebanon and Gaza
Here is my comment:

The poster is right that the main culprit are those that push the lie, however, not all who tend to 'believe" it are really innocent.
Deep down most know it's a bluff.


_


WHO INVENTED THE GENOCIDE LIE — AND WHY?
The make-believe “Palestinian genocide” has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them. Quite the opposite.
Pat's BEATEN WITH A SHTICK.
May 04, 2026

It’s a lie. But why?

I don’t invoke Nazis very often. That history is so massive and horrific, its lessons so sacred, that to flippantly throw around accusations of, or comparison with, Naziism is to defile the memory of the victims. Of course, that does not stop those who equate everything they don’t like with Hitler.

That’s bad enough.

Far, far worse, is the Holocaust inversion that has become routine in the world today: the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

To casually toss around Nazi analogies is to defile a people’s history. To go a step further and calculatingly invert that history and project onto the victims the crimes that were perpetrated on their people is a mindboggling depth of sadistic inhumanity.

That it comes mostly from people who sanctimoniously claim the flag of antiracism, humanitarianism, and wokeness heaps the salt of audacity on the wound of atrocity.

However despicable this phenomenon, it succeeds in minimizing Jewish history and experience with genocide. So, when I am moved to make a relevant comparison with that past, the power is diminished, because this history has been negligently thrown around so habitually. Which is precisely the point.

Abuse of Holocaust memory plays multiple roles in the current discourse.

It diminishes the history itself, reducing Jewish experiences with discrimination — which are undeniably among the worst in human history — to mundane misfortune. It implies that Jews overreact about past traumas, which means we can ignore their pleas for contemporary tolerance and warnings about deteriorating social climates. It assumes that Jews exploit their history for political gain — and defiantly asserts that two can play at that game. Further, if Jewish fears are really just an overreaction, there is no justification for Israel as a refuge for imperiled Jews. Moreover, it flattens unique Jewish experiences into an indifferent “all people have suffered” equivalency.

Strategically, it inverts victim and perpetrator, neutralizing sympathy for Jews by asserting that they are no better than Nazis.

Not to be overlooked, this tactic also emotionally terrorizes Jews, which is an undeniable reward for the ostensible human rights defenders who behave in this way. Sadism is a massive and unexplored factor in this “dialogue.”

But there is something far more perilous in this Holocaust inversion.

Some of the people engaged in this defilement of Holocaust history do so with a very specific end goal.

A quick history lesson will illustrate …

Before the Holocaust, Jews made up about 1% of the German population. Despite this infinitesimally small number, Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as having enormous, sinister power — a “1%” supposedly controlling or corrupting the “99%.” Rather than undermining the propaganda, the numerical differential was itself proof. So much power for such small numbers!

Nazis blamed Jews for everything negative and portrayed them as the embodiment of evil and disaster. They blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in the First World War, for the Treaty of Versailles, for inflation, unemployment, communism, capitalism, liberalism, modern art, sexual “degeneracy,” and the alleged weakening of German culture.

Jews were useful scapegoats: instead of addressing the root causes of economic collapse, political failure, militarism, or class conflict, Nazis offered one simple enemy.

Naziism took historical antisemitism and supercharged it. Traditionally, whatever was Jewish was considered evil. More than ever before, under the Nazis, that equation inverted. Whatever was evil was cast as distinctively Jewish.

That framing justified the atrocities to come. Boycotts, firings, professional bans, public humiliation, and legal discrimination. Random beatings and coordinated, systemic violence. Segregation. Dispossession. Deportation. Mass murder with the goal of complete genocide.

Now …

The world today is a tragic mess. Even if the world were not already filled with conflict, inequality, tragedy, horrors and sadism, the advent of new technologies in the past couple of decades would bombard us with the worst images and news imaginable. Sadly, the news is overwhelmingly conflictual, tragic, horrific, the perpetrators of inequality and injustice demonstrating depths of sadism rarely seen. Social media and inescapable 24/7 news and commentary magnify that awfulness.

It all seems so hopeless. What can one person do? There are no easy answers.

And yet, it is at times like these that easy answers are most in demand.

And there is always someone ready to meet that demand.

This is why the “pro-Palestinian” movement has succeeded so wildly. In a world filled with incomprehensibly complex tragedies, this one conflict (which is comparatively minor, in terms of casualties among global flashpoints today) serves to concentrate global attention.

Just as the Nazis projected onto Jews every sin, real or imagined, facing the German people, the “pro-Palestinian” movement projects onto Israel every sin (real or imagined) of today’s world: inequality, injustice, racism, imperialism, greed, nationalism, tribalism … it is a catch-all for whatever one loathes. If the puzzle piece doesn’t fit the picture, the Goebbelses of the Palestinian narrative will hammer it until it does.

The Nazis blamed Jews for the worst sins they could conjure.

The Palestinian narrative blames Israel for the worst imaginable sins — except there’s a twist.

The Nazis mainstreamed genocide as a political imperative.

Since 1945, this has been recognized as the greatest crime humankind has ever invented.

And so, of course, it had to be that this greatest crime would soon come to be projected onto Jews.

Despite all evidence, much of the world contends that Palestinians are experiencing “genocide.”

This has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them.

It is a make-believe crime invented to frame the Jewish state.

No evidence required.

All evidence to the contrary discarded.

Returning to the lessons of the past, some of the Germans who fell for this propaganda were, in a sense, victims themselves, brainwashed into believing the worst about Jews.

Some of the “pro-Palestinians” who swallow the “Palestinian genocide” Kool-Aid today are likewise victims of a sort, having ignorantly succumbed to one of history’s biggest and most dangerous lies.

But the instigators of the libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are building a case against Jews — Israelis, yes, but Jews generally, since the polite distinctions the more politically savvy Israel-bashers make are irrelevant to those who invented the strategy.

They are creating a scenario in which Jews are widely accepted as perpetrators of civilization’s greatest evil.

Genocide.

In the interest of preventing a repetition of such atrocities — and in the most convoluted (im)moral inversion imaginable, it is the very lessons of Jewish genocide that are often invoked as justification — Israel is denounced as the agent of the greatest evil.

Many of the people who succumb to this outrageous lie are, in a sense, victims, like the Germans before them who fell for hate propaganda.

But those who invented and do the most to perpetuate the genocide libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are pinning a fake genocide on the Jews in order to “solve” the imaginary genocide by planning a real one.

The prevalent anti-Israel slogan says it all: “By any means necessary.”

They will spread the vicious lie that Jews are perpetrating the worst crime imaginable in order to foment that very crime — genocide — against Jews.

It seems incredible.

But this precise blueprint has been used before. With tremendous success.

Early genocidal zionists could never have predicted the development of the internet. Post-internet, it's near impossible to hide the genocide. :dunno:
 
Here is my comment:

The poster is right that the main culprit are those that push the lie, however, not all who tend to 'believe" it are really innocent.
Deep down most know it's a bluff.


_


WHO INVENTED THE GENOCIDE LIE — AND WHY?
The make-believe “Palestinian genocide” has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them. Quite the opposite.
Pat's BEATEN WITH A SHTICK.
May 04, 2026

It’s a lie. But why?

I don’t invoke Nazis very often. That history is so massive and horrific, its lessons so sacred, that to flippantly throw around accusations of, or comparison with, Naziism is to defile the memory of the victims. Of course, that does not stop those who equate everything they don’t like with Hitler.

That’s bad enough.

Far, far worse, is the Holocaust inversion that has become routine in the world today: the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

To casually toss around Nazi analogies is to defile a people’s history. To go a step further and calculatingly invert that history and project onto the victims the crimes that were perpetrated on their people is a mindboggling depth of sadistic inhumanity.

That it comes mostly from people who sanctimoniously claim the flag of antiracism, humanitarianism, and wokeness heaps the salt of audacity on the wound of atrocity.

However despicable this phenomenon, it succeeds in minimizing Jewish history and experience with genocide. So, when I am moved to make a relevant comparison with that past, the power is diminished, because this history has been negligently thrown around so habitually. Which is precisely the point.

Abuse of Holocaust memory plays multiple roles in the current discourse.

It diminishes the history itself, reducing Jewish experiences with discrimination — which are undeniably among the worst in human history — to mundane misfortune. It implies that Jews overreact about past traumas, which means we can ignore their pleas for contemporary tolerance and warnings about deteriorating social climates. It assumes that Jews exploit their history for political gain — and defiantly asserts that two can play at that game. Further, if Jewish fears are really just an overreaction, there is no justification for Israel as a refuge for imperiled Jews. Moreover, it flattens unique Jewish experiences into an indifferent “all people have suffered” equivalency.

Strategically, it inverts victim and perpetrator, neutralizing sympathy for Jews by asserting that they are no better than Nazis.

Not to be overlooked, this tactic also emotionally terrorizes Jews, which is an undeniable reward for the ostensible human rights defenders who behave in this way. Sadism is a massive and unexplored factor in this “dialogue.”

But there is something far more perilous in this Holocaust inversion.

Some of the people engaged in this defilement of Holocaust history do so with a very specific end goal.

A quick history lesson will illustrate …

Before the Holocaust, Jews made up about 1% of the German population. Despite this infinitesimally small number, Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as having enormous, sinister power — a “1%” supposedly controlling or corrupting the “99%.” Rather than undermining the propaganda, the numerical differential was itself proof. So much power for such small numbers!

Nazis blamed Jews for everything negative and portrayed them as the embodiment of evil and disaster. They blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in the First World War, for the Treaty of Versailles, for inflation, unemployment, communism, capitalism, liberalism, modern art, sexual “degeneracy,” and the alleged weakening of German culture.

Jews were useful scapegoats: instead of addressing the root causes of economic collapse, political failure, militarism, or class conflict, Nazis offered one simple enemy.

Naziism took historical antisemitism and supercharged it. Traditionally, whatever was Jewish was considered evil. More than ever before, under the Nazis, that equation inverted. Whatever was evil was cast as distinctively Jewish.

That framing justified the atrocities to come. Boycotts, firings, professional bans, public humiliation, and legal discrimination. Random beatings and coordinated, systemic violence. Segregation. Dispossession. Deportation. Mass murder with the goal of complete genocide.

Now …

The world today is a tragic mess. Even if the world were not already filled with conflict, inequality, tragedy, horrors and sadism, the advent of new technologies in the past couple of decades would bombard us with the worst images and news imaginable. Sadly, the news is overwhelmingly conflictual, tragic, horrific, the perpetrators of inequality and injustice demonstrating depths of sadism rarely seen. Social media and inescapable 24/7 news and commentary magnify that awfulness.

It all seems so hopeless. What can one person do? There are no easy answers.

And yet, it is at times like these that easy answers are most in demand.

And there is always someone ready to meet that demand.

This is why the “pro-Palestinian” movement has succeeded so wildly. In a world filled with incomprehensibly complex tragedies, this one conflict (which is comparatively minor, in terms of casualties among global flashpoints today) serves to concentrate global attention.

Just as the Nazis projected onto Jews every sin, real or imagined, facing the German people, the “pro-Palestinian” movement projects onto Israel every sin (real or imagined) of today’s world: inequality, injustice, racism, imperialism, greed, nationalism, tribalism … it is a catch-all for whatever one loathes. If the puzzle piece doesn’t fit the picture, the Goebbelses of the Palestinian narrative will hammer it until it does.

The Nazis blamed Jews for the worst sins they could conjure.

The Palestinian narrative blames Israel for the worst imaginable sins — except there’s a twist.

The Nazis mainstreamed genocide as a political imperative.

Since 1945, this has been recognized as the greatest crime humankind has ever invented.

And so, of course, it had to be that this greatest crime would soon come to be projected onto Jews.

Despite all evidence, much of the world contends that Palestinians are experiencing “genocide.”

This has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them.

It is a make-believe crime invented to frame the Jewish state.

No evidence required.

All evidence to the contrary discarded.

Returning to the lessons of the past, some of the Germans who fell for this propaganda were, in a sense, victims themselves, brainwashed into believing the worst about Jews.

Some of the “pro-Palestinians” who swallow the “Palestinian genocide” Kool-Aid today are likewise victims of a sort, having ignorantly succumbed to one of history’s biggest and most dangerous lies.

But the instigators of the libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are building a case against Jews — Israelis, yes, but Jews generally, since the polite distinctions the more politically savvy Israel-bashers make are irrelevant to those who invented the strategy.

They are creating a scenario in which Jews are widely accepted as perpetrators of civilization’s greatest evil.

Genocide.

In the interest of preventing a repetition of such atrocities — and in the most convoluted (im)moral inversion imaginable, it is the very lessons of Jewish genocide that are often invoked as justification — Israel is denounced as the agent of the greatest evil.

Many of the people who succumb to this outrageous lie are, in a sense, victims, like the Germans before them who fell for hate propaganda.

But those who invented and do the most to perpetuate the genocide libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are pinning a fake genocide on the Jews in order to “solve” the imaginary genocide by planning a real one.

The prevalent anti-Israel slogan says it all: “By any means necessary.”

They will spread the vicious lie that Jews are perpetrating the worst crime imaginable in order to foment that very crime — genocide — against Jews.

It seems incredible.

But this precise blueprint has been used before. With tremendous success.

Genocide is an emotive word. If you get people thinking it's genocide, then you're winning the propaganda war.

The problem with the whole conflict is both sides are involved in some mindbending propaganda. While both sides do bad things.

And they know most people see genocide as "killing loads of people"
 
Every day Israeli monsters slaughter people in Lebanon and Gaza

Early genocidal zionists could never have predicted the development of the internet. Post-internet, it's near impossible to hide the genocide. :dunno:
What is "genocide"?
 

Who Invented the "genocide" lie and why?​


Let's make this easy: take an Arab from somewhere in the world and unless he is living IN Gaza or SAYS he is Palestinian, there really is no objective test I know of to determine them as a Palestinian. They, the Israelis and others of the general region are all of the same haplogroup.

So, how can you genocide a group which is ill-defined and only really exists by their location of habitat rather than anything objectively genetic?
 
Here is my comment:

The poster is right that the main culprit are those that push the lie, however, not all who tend to 'believe" it are really innocent.
Deep down most know it's a bluff.


_


WHO INVENTED THE GENOCIDE LIE — AND WHY?
The make-believe “Palestinian genocide” has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them. Quite the opposite.
Pat's BEATEN WITH A SHTICK.
May 04, 2026

It’s a lie. But why?

I don’t invoke Nazis very often. That history is so massive and horrific, its lessons so sacred, that to flippantly throw around accusations of, or comparison with, Naziism is to defile the memory of the victims. Of course, that does not stop those who equate everything they don’t like with Hitler.

That’s bad enough.

Far, far worse, is the Holocaust inversion that has become routine in the world today: the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

To casually toss around Nazi analogies is to defile a people’s history. To go a step further and calculatingly invert that history and project onto the victims the crimes that were perpetrated on their people is a mindboggling depth of sadistic inhumanity.

That it comes mostly from people who sanctimoniously claim the flag of antiracism, humanitarianism, and wokeness heaps the salt of audacity on the wound of atrocity.

However despicable this phenomenon, it succeeds in minimizing Jewish history and experience with genocide. So, when I am moved to make a relevant comparison with that past, the power is diminished, because this history has been negligently thrown around so habitually. Which is precisely the point.

Abuse of Holocaust memory plays multiple roles in the current discourse.

It diminishes the history itself, reducing Jewish experiences with discrimination — which are undeniably among the worst in human history — to mundane misfortune. It implies that Jews overreact about past traumas, which means we can ignore their pleas for contemporary tolerance and warnings about deteriorating social climates. It assumes that Jews exploit their history for political gain — and defiantly asserts that two can play at that game. Further, if Jewish fears are really just an overreaction, there is no justification for Israel as a refuge for imperiled Jews. Moreover, it flattens unique Jewish experiences into an indifferent “all people have suffered” equivalency.

Strategically, it inverts victim and perpetrator, neutralizing sympathy for Jews by asserting that they are no better than Nazis.

Not to be overlooked, this tactic also emotionally terrorizes Jews, which is an undeniable reward for the ostensible human rights defenders who behave in this way. Sadism is a massive and unexplored factor in this “dialogue.”

But there is something far more perilous in this Holocaust inversion.

Some of the people engaged in this defilement of Holocaust history do so with a very specific end goal.

A quick history lesson will illustrate …

Before the Holocaust, Jews made up about 1% of the German population. Despite this infinitesimally small number, Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as having enormous, sinister power — a “1%” supposedly controlling or corrupting the “99%.” Rather than undermining the propaganda, the numerical differential was itself proof. So much power for such small numbers!

Nazis blamed Jews for everything negative and portrayed them as the embodiment of evil and disaster. They blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in the First World War, for the Treaty of Versailles, for inflation, unemployment, communism, capitalism, liberalism, modern art, sexual “degeneracy,” and the alleged weakening of German culture.

Jews were useful scapegoats: instead of addressing the root causes of economic collapse, political failure, militarism, or class conflict, Nazis offered one simple enemy.

Naziism took historical antisemitism and supercharged it. Traditionally, whatever was Jewish was considered evil. More than ever before, under the Nazis, that equation inverted. Whatever was evil was cast as distinctively Jewish.

That framing justified the atrocities to come. Boycotts, firings, professional bans, public humiliation, and legal discrimination. Random beatings and coordinated, systemic violence. Segregation. Dispossession. Deportation. Mass murder with the goal of complete genocide.

Now …

The world today is a tragic mess. Even if the world were not already filled with conflict, inequality, tragedy, horrors and sadism, the advent of new technologies in the past couple of decades would bombard us with the worst images and news imaginable. Sadly, the news is overwhelmingly conflictual, tragic, horrific, the perpetrators of inequality and injustice demonstrating depths of sadism rarely seen. Social media and inescapable 24/7 news and commentary magnify that awfulness.

It all seems so hopeless. What can one person do? There are no easy answers.

And yet, it is at times like these that easy answers are most in demand.

And there is always someone ready to meet that demand.

This is why the “pro-Palestinian” movement has succeeded so wildly. In a world filled with incomprehensibly complex tragedies, this one conflict (which is comparatively minor, in terms of casualties among global flashpoints today) serves to concentrate global attention.

Just as the Nazis projected onto Jews every sin, real or imagined, facing the German people, the “pro-Palestinian” movement projects onto Israel every sin (real or imagined) of today’s world: inequality, injustice, racism, imperialism, greed, nationalism, tribalism … it is a catch-all for whatever one loathes. If the puzzle piece doesn’t fit the picture, the Goebbelses of the Palestinian narrative will hammer it until it does.

The Nazis blamed Jews for the worst sins they could conjure.

The Palestinian narrative blames Israel for the worst imaginable sins — except there’s a twist.

The Nazis mainstreamed genocide as a political imperative.

Since 1945, this has been recognized as the greatest crime humankind has ever invented.

And so, of course, it had to be that this greatest crime would soon come to be projected onto Jews.

Despite all evidence, much of the world contends that Palestinians are experiencing “genocide.”

This has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them.

It is a make-believe crime invented to frame the Jewish state.

No evidence required.

All evidence to the contrary discarded.

Returning to the lessons of the past, some of the Germans who fell for this propaganda were, in a sense, victims themselves, brainwashed into believing the worst about Jews.

Some of the “pro-Palestinians” who swallow the “Palestinian genocide” Kool-Aid today are likewise victims of a sort, having ignorantly succumbed to one of history’s biggest and most dangerous lies.

But the instigators of the libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are building a case against Jews — Israelis, yes, but Jews generally, since the polite distinctions the more politically savvy Israel-bashers make are irrelevant to those who invented the strategy.

They are creating a scenario in which Jews are widely accepted as perpetrators of civilization’s greatest evil.

Genocide.

In the interest of preventing a repetition of such atrocities — and in the most convoluted (im)moral inversion imaginable, it is the very lessons of Jewish genocide that are often invoked as justification — Israel is denounced as the agent of the greatest evil.

Many of the people who succumb to this outrageous lie are, in a sense, victims, like the Germans before them who fell for hate propaganda.

But those who invented and do the most to perpetuate the genocide libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are pinning a fake genocide on the Jews in order to “solve” the imaginary genocide by planning a real one.

The prevalent anti-Israel slogan says it all: “By any means necessary.”

They will spread the vicious lie that Jews are perpetrating the worst crime imaginable in order to foment that very crime — genocide — against Jews.

It seems incredible.

But this precise blueprint has been used before. With tremendous success.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Genocide refers to the intentional destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, and the term was coined by Raphael Lemkin in 1944. Significant historical examples include the Armenian genocide during WW I and the Nazi Holocaust of WWII, where millions were systematically killed and the "Ukrainian Holodomor" by Stalin and Communist USSR.
There was no "Genocide" against Palestinians in Gaza.
 
Dear Mr MisterBeale.

  • First you cite Qatar's Hamas-linked al jazeera as if it's reliable.
  • Then you cite its sister site: Qatar --which hosts Hamas-- other arm: middleeasteye MEE. Yet another genocidal-Hamas linked machine.
  • Then you cite smotrich, if he said or not, is not even the issue, you present him as if he has any say in international affairs or on the Gaza war at all. He was never in war cabinet either. And for good reason.
  • I'm always amazed at the propagandists desperation to promote the genocide lie.
FACTS:

While the IDF, at great risk to its own soldiers, employs methods aimed at minimizing civilian casualties, gemocidal Arab-Palestinian leadership and militant groups exploit civilians—using them as shields and diverting humanitarian aid—and, together with biased ‘activists’ and segments of the so-called human rights leadership (who are anything but when it comes to Israel), promote what can be called ‘Pallywood 2.0.’ or Pallyweid 2.0. Having already advanced the ‘apartheid’ trope, they now push the unfounded ‘genocide’ accusation.


There is a reason why wikipedian organized gang of 40 is the problem there.

Wikipedia founder slams 'Gaza Genocida' article
Nov 3, 2025 — Jimmy Wales warned the "Gaza Genocide" article needed immediate attention, as it "failed to meet the neutrality standards of Wikipedia."
 
Last edited:
Genocide is an emotive word. If you get people thinking it's genocide, then you're winning the propaganda war.

The problem with the whole conflict is both sides are involved in some mindbending propaganda. While both sides do bad things.

And they know most people see genocide as "killing loads of people"
But that's all the Left do because they run on feelings, they just try emotional words all the time thinking it makes their argument true. The words are in the wrong context, it makes everyone else's eyes roll. Just because they dislike someone, forever calling them a Hitler is just laughable. They obviously don't mind looking like a penishead.
 
But that's all the Left do because they run on feelings, they just try emotional words all the time thinking it makes their argument true. The words are in the wrong context, it makes everyone else's eyes roll. Just because they dislike someone, forever calling them a Hitler is just laughable. They obviously don't mind looking like a penishead.
Yes. It's why they posted fake images. AKA preconditions sick children UNRELATED to the war, all in order to shock.






output_meme_20260505_092706_user_8quv2ny2p_cdf4b8cb.webp
output_meme_20260505_092706_user_8quv2ny2p_c5ceb47f.webp
output_meme_20260505_092706_user_8quv2ny2p_eec16cf6.webp
output_meme_20260505_092706_user_8quv2ny2p_5d68b8a8.webp
output_meme_20260505_092706_user_8quv2ny2p_8ff6ef02.webp
 
Last edited:
Is Israel killing Palestinians at the same clip since the Iran war started.

One would think lefties want Israel distracted,
 
Here is my comment:

The poster is right that the main culprit are those that push the lie, however, not all who tend to 'believe" it are really innocent.
Deep down most know it's a bluff.


_


WHO INVENTED THE GENOCIDE LIE — AND WHY?
The make-believe “Palestinian genocide” has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them. Quite the opposite.
Pat's BEATEN WITH A SHTICK.
May 04, 2026

It’s a lie. But why?

I don’t invoke Nazis very often. That history is so massive and horrific, its lessons so sacred, that to flippantly throw around accusations of, or comparison with, Naziism is to defile the memory of the victims. Of course, that does not stop those who equate everything they don’t like with Hitler.

That’s bad enough.

Far, far worse, is the Holocaust inversion that has become routine in the world today: the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

To casually toss around Nazi analogies is to defile a people’s history. To go a step further and calculatingly invert that history and project onto the victims the crimes that were perpetrated on their people is a mindboggling depth of sadistic inhumanity.

That it comes mostly from people who sanctimoniously claim the flag of antiracism, humanitarianism, and wokeness heaps the salt of audacity on the wound of atrocity.

However despicable this phenomenon, it succeeds in minimizing Jewish history and experience with genocide. So, when I am moved to make a relevant comparison with that past, the power is diminished, because this history has been negligently thrown around so habitually. Which is precisely the point.

Abuse of Holocaust memory plays multiple roles in the current discourse.

It diminishes the history itself, reducing Jewish experiences with discrimination — which are undeniably among the worst in human history — to mundane misfortune. It implies that Jews overreact about past traumas, which means we can ignore their pleas for contemporary tolerance and warnings about deteriorating social climates. It assumes that Jews exploit their history for political gain — and defiantly asserts that two can play at that game. Further, if Jewish fears are really just an overreaction, there is no justification for Israel as a refuge for imperiled Jews. Moreover, it flattens unique Jewish experiences into an indifferent “all people have suffered” equivalency.

Strategically, it inverts victim and perpetrator, neutralizing sympathy for Jews by asserting that they are no better than Nazis.

Not to be overlooked, this tactic also emotionally terrorizes Jews, which is an undeniable reward for the ostensible human rights defenders who behave in this way. Sadism is a massive and unexplored factor in this “dialogue.”

But there is something far more perilous in this Holocaust inversion.

Some of the people engaged in this defilement of Holocaust history do so with a very specific end goal.

A quick history lesson will illustrate …

Before the Holocaust, Jews made up about 1% of the German population. Despite this infinitesimally small number, Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as having enormous, sinister power — a “1%” supposedly controlling or corrupting the “99%.” Rather than undermining the propaganda, the numerical differential was itself proof. So much power for such small numbers!

Nazis blamed Jews for everything negative and portrayed them as the embodiment of evil and disaster. They blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in the First World War, for the Treaty of Versailles, for inflation, unemployment, communism, capitalism, liberalism, modern art, sexual “degeneracy,” and the alleged weakening of German culture.

Jews were useful scapegoats: instead of addressing the root causes of economic collapse, political failure, militarism, or class conflict, Nazis offered one simple enemy.

Naziism took historical antisemitism and supercharged it. Traditionally, whatever was Jewish was considered evil. More than ever before, under the Nazis, that equation inverted. Whatever was evil was cast as distinctively Jewish.

That framing justified the atrocities to come. Boycotts, firings, professional bans, public humiliation, and legal discrimination. Random beatings and coordinated, systemic violence. Segregation. Dispossession. Deportation. Mass murder with the goal of complete genocide.

Now …

The world today is a tragic mess. Even if the world were not already filled with conflict, inequality, tragedy, horrors and sadism, the advent of new technologies in the past couple of decades would bombard us with the worst images and news imaginable. Sadly, the news is overwhelmingly conflictual, tragic, horrific, the perpetrators of inequality and injustice demonstrating depths of sadism rarely seen. Social media and inescapable 24/7 news and commentary magnify that awfulness.

It all seems so hopeless. What can one person do? There are no easy answers.

And yet, it is at times like these that easy answers are most in demand.

And there is always someone ready to meet that demand.

This is why the “pro-Palestinian” movement has succeeded so wildly. In a world filled with incomprehensibly complex tragedies, this one conflict (which is comparatively minor, in terms of casualties among global flashpoints today) serves to concentrate global attention.

Just as the Nazis projected onto Jews every sin, real or imagined, facing the German people, the “pro-Palestinian” movement projects onto Israel every sin (real or imagined) of today’s world: inequality, injustice, racism, imperialism, greed, nationalism, tribalism … it is a catch-all for whatever one loathes. If the puzzle piece doesn’t fit the picture, the Goebbelses of the Palestinian narrative will hammer it until it does.

The Nazis blamed Jews for the worst sins they could conjure.

The Palestinian narrative blames Israel for the worst imaginable sins — except there’s a twist.

The Nazis mainstreamed genocide as a political imperative.

Since 1945, this has been recognized as the greatest crime humankind has ever invented.

And so, of course, it had to be that this greatest crime would soon come to be projected onto Jews.

Despite all evidence, much of the world contends that Palestinians are experiencing “genocide.”

This has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them.

It is a make-believe crime invented to frame the Jewish state.

No evidence required.

All evidence to the contrary discarded.

Returning to the lessons of the past, some of the Germans who fell for this propaganda were, in a sense, victims themselves, brainwashed into believing the worst about Jews.

Some of the “pro-Palestinians” who swallow the “Palestinian genocide” Kool-Aid today are likewise victims of a sort, having ignorantly succumbed to one of history’s biggest and most dangerous lies.

But the instigators of the libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are building a case against Jews — Israelis, yes, but Jews generally, since the polite distinctions the more politically savvy Israel-bashers make are irrelevant to those who invented the strategy.

They are creating a scenario in which Jews are widely accepted as perpetrators of civilization’s greatest evil.

Genocide.

In the interest of preventing a repetition of such atrocities — and in the most convoluted (im)moral inversion imaginable, it is the very lessons of Jewish genocide that are often invoked as justification — Israel is denounced as the agent of the greatest evil.

Many of the people who succumb to this outrageous lie are, in a sense, victims, like the Germans before them who fell for hate propaganda.

But those who invented and do the most to perpetuate the genocide libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are pinning a fake genocide on the Jews in order to “solve” the imaginary genocide by planning a real one.

The prevalent anti-Israel slogan says it all: “By any means necessary.”

They will spread the vicious lie that Jews are perpetrating the worst crime imaginable in order to foment that very crime — genocide — against Jews.

It seems incredible.

But this precise blueprint has been used before. With tremendous success.

Do you also deny the Holocaust?
 
15th post
Where are the BODIES?
The whole "gEnOcIdE" bullshit is just a FREAKING NARRATIVE that you JOOOOO haters push.
It's as phony as the mythical land of PALESTINE.
:rolleyes:
Under the rubble.

Gaza is totally destroyed. Hardly a building stands in a tiny geographical area that once held over 2 million people (prisoners of the Zio Nazi regime). Half of whom were children.

Do you always deny what your eyes tell you?

Zionists are the dumbest MFers on the planet.
 
Under the rubble.

Gaza is totally destroyed. Hardly a building stands in a tiny geographical area that once held over 2 million people (prisoners of the Zio Nazi regime). Half of whom were children.

Do you always deny what your eyes tell you?

Zionists are the dumbest MFers on the planet.
Yeah, sure.
Perhaps they shouldn't shoot THOUSANDS of missiles into Israel.
FAFO BITCHES.
And words mean things.
The use of the word GENOCIDE is pathetically OVER DRAMATIC to draw sympathy.
What they actually get is toxic empathy from SIMPS like YOU.
:rolleyes:
 
Yeah, sure.
Perhaps they shouldn't shoot THOUSANDS of missiles into Israel.
FAFO BITCHES.
And words mean things.
The use of the word GENOCIDE is pathetically OVER DRAMATIC to draw sympathy.
What they actually get is toxic empathy from SIMPS like YOU.
:rolleyes:
Dumb. You obviously know nothing about Palestine, like so many dumb fvck Americans.

The Zionists (aka Nazis) own your dumb ass.
 
Dear Mr MisterBeale.

  • First you cite Qatar's Hamas-linked al jazeera as if it's reliable.
  • Then you cite its sister site: Qatar --which hosts Hamas-- other arm: middleeasteye MEE. Yet another genocidal-Hamas linked machine.
  • Then you cite smotrich, if he said or not, is not even the issue, you present him as if he has any say in international affairs or on the Gaza war at all. He was never in war cabinet either. And for good reason.
  • I'm always amazed at the propagandists desperation to promote the genocide lie.
FACTS:

While the IDF, at great risk to its own soldiers, employs methods aimed at minimizing civilian casualties, gemocidal Arab-Palestinian leadership and militant groups exploit civilians—using them as shields and diverting humanitarian aid—and, together with biased ‘activists’ and segments of the so-called human rights leadership (who are anything but when it comes to Israel), promote what can be called ‘Pallywood 2.0.’ or Pallyweid 2.0. Having already advanced the ‘apartheid’ trope, they now push the unfounded ‘genocide’ accusation.


There is a reason why wikipedian organized gang of 40 is the problem there.

Wikipedia founder slams 'Gaza Genocida' article
Nov 3, 2025 — Jimmy Wales warned the "Gaza Genocide" article needed immediate attention, as it "failed to meet the neutrality standards of Wikipedia."
I don't really care about your fallacies, and most of America doesn't anymore either.
 
Back
Top Bottom