Bragg has still not specified the underlying crime that resurrected dead misdemeanors.

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope. Not according to binding precedent and the plain language of the law.

According to the law the law trump supposedly violated was a misdemeanor that has ran it statute of limitation and the other part Bragg must show an underlying crime to make it a felony

 

[Marener]

According to the law the law trump supposedly violated was a misdemeanor that has ran it statute of limitation and the other part Bragg must show an underlying crime to make it a felony

The law and precedent only say he intended to commit another underlying crime.

Merchan and Bragg know this. You don’t, despite being told repeatedly.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The law and precedent only say he intended to commit another underlying crime.

Merchan and Bragg know this. You don’t, despite being told repeatedly.

Youre still spouting your lack of knowledge

 

[Marener]

Youre still spouting your lack of knowledge

How do you know?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How do you know?

You're words are showing it. How do you charge anyone when the statute of limitation has run out?!

 

[Marener]

You're words are showing it. How do you charge anyone when the statute of limitation has run out?!

It hasn’t run out.

Again, this is more complicated than you are capable of understanding.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It hasn’t run out.

Again, this is more complicated than you are capable of understanding.

In new York misdemeanors have a 2 year statute of limitation NYPL § 175.05
Secondly
First, NYPL § 175.10 requires proof that the defendant committed a misdemeanor under NYPL § 175.05 (“A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree [175.10]

 

[Marener]

In new York misdemeanors have a 2 year statute of limitation NYPL § 175.05
Secondly
First, NYPL § 175.10 requires proof that the defendant committed a misdemeanor under NYPL § 175.05 (“A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree [175.10]

They didn’t charge the misdemeanor so the statute of limitations is far longer than 2 years.

 

[justoffal]

Despite the claims of many here, there has been no specified crime, a lot of convoluted theories, but nothing specific. And the judge doesn’t see a problem with this.

No way this isn’t overturned once it gets in front of real judges on appeal.

Prosecutors are still hedging on exactly what 'crime' Trump tried to 'aid' or 'conceal'

Donald Trump is charged with 34 felonies in New York because he allegedly falsified business records to conceal "another crime." In the run-up to Trump's

reason.com

Of course not The whole idea is to draw it out and keep Trump off the campaign trail.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They didn’t charge the misdemeanor so the statute of limitations is far longer than 2 years.

Maybe you didn't read my post. Maybe you did if you did then you lack comprehension.

First, NYPL § 175.10 requires proof that the defendant committed a misdemeanor under NYPL § 175.05

 

[Marener]

Maybe you didn't read my post. Maybe you did if you did then you lack comprehension.

First, NYPL § 175.10 requires proof that the defendant committed a misdemeanor under NYPL § 175.05

Yes. They spent ample time at trial proving he falsified business records.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes. They spent ample time at trial proving he falsified business records.

Yes. They spent ample time at trial proving he falsified business records.

Was that when Cohen confessed to stealing money from trump?

 

[Marener]

Was that when Cohen confessed to stealing money from trump?

Nope. Youd have to be pretty poorly informed to suggest such a thing.

 

[BackAgain]

This case is just a little too complex for the average right wing media consumer’s level of comprehension.

It is obviously miles over your head and the heads of you libtards in general.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope. Youd have to be pretty poorly informed to suggest such a thing.

Then you're lying Bragg never made any case

 

[Marener]

Then you're lying Bragg never made any case

Then what do you think they spent the last few weeks doing?

You don’t actually know.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Then what do you think they spent the last few weeks doing?

You don’t actually know.

Bragg has never made the case
Your key witness is a convicted liar and admitted thief. And no case was made for Bragg.

 

[Marener]

Bragg has never made the case

So ignorant.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So ignorant.

Yes you are ignorant

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Alvin Bragg gave America another Trump 4 years in the white house