Who Invented the "genocide" lie and why?

If your city decided they wanted to build some public housing where you live and declared eminent domain, you could either a) sell your property to the government b) get some of your fellow residents together to protest or c) attempt to burn down city hall. The Arabs chose option c.

Except the Zionists didn't give them option A or B, and the UN had no business declaring "Eminent" domain on someone else's land.

The British started dumping Europe's Jewish refuse into Palestine as early as 1920, but the Arabs complained about it so they stopped. Then the war happened, and everyone felt sad about what Hitler did.

But the Arabs didn't do that to them.

If America is so keen on a Jewish state, we should give them one of ours. I nominated your state, because according to you it's so nice. (even though you won't tell us which state that is.)

Actually it kind of does. Like I said, war has consequences. They chose to go to war instead of accepting a reality that they may not have liked. Oh well, too bad. 75 years later is well past time for them to accept that they lost and move on. Their great-grandfathers should have taken the deal offered to them.

If the Zionist Entity has to exist in a constant state of war with its neighbors (Dragging us into them for the last 50 years) what is the point?
 
Except the Zionists didn't give them option A or B, and the UN had no business declaring "Eminent" domain on someone else's land.

True, with the exception of land that was necessary for the public domain where they would be paid, they were given the option to stay, but they decided they didn’t want to do that either.

If America is so keen on a Jewish state, we should give them one of ours. I nominated your state, because according to you it's so nice. (even though you won't tell us which state that is.)

The Jewish people had roots to the area going back 3000 years. They have the oldest claim to the land, but ironically enough, they were exiled via war over the years. Funny how that goes isn’t it?
 
The Jewish people had roots to the area going back 3000 years. They have the oldest claim to the land, but ironically enough, they were exiled via war over the years. Funny how that goes isn’t it?

Right, the book with the Talking Snake and the Giant in it says so, so it MUST be true.
 
Here is my comment:

The poster is right that the main culprit are those that push the lie, however, not all who tend to 'believe" it are really innocent.
Deep down most know it's a bluff.


_


WHO INVENTED THE GENOCIDE LIE — AND WHY?
The make-believe “Palestinian genocide” has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them. Quite the opposite.
Pat's BEATEN WITH A SHTICK.
May 04, 2026

It’s a lie. But why?

I don’t invoke Nazis very often. That history is so massive and horrific, its lessons so sacred, that to flippantly throw around accusations of, or comparison with, Naziism is to defile the memory of the victims. Of course, that does not stop those who equate everything they don’t like with Hitler.

That’s bad enough.

Far, far worse, is the Holocaust inversion that has become routine in the world today: the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

To casually toss around Nazi analogies is to defile a people’s history. To go a step further and calculatingly invert that history and project onto the victims the crimes that were perpetrated on their people is a mindboggling depth of sadistic inhumanity.

That it comes mostly from people who sanctimoniously claim the flag of antiracism, humanitarianism, and wokeness heaps the salt of audacity on the wound of atrocity.

However despicable this phenomenon, it succeeds in minimizing Jewish history and experience with genocide. So, when I am moved to make a relevant comparison with that past, the power is diminished, because this history has been negligently thrown around so habitually. Which is precisely the point.

Abuse of Holocaust memory plays multiple roles in the current discourse.

It diminishes the history itself, reducing Jewish experiences with discrimination — which are undeniably among the worst in human history — to mundane misfortune. It implies that Jews overreact about past traumas, which means we can ignore their pleas for contemporary tolerance and warnings about deteriorating social climates. It assumes that Jews exploit their history for political gain — and defiantly asserts that two can play at that game. Further, if Jewish fears are really just an overreaction, there is no justification for Israel as a refuge for imperiled Jews. Moreover, it flattens unique Jewish experiences into an indifferent “all people have suffered” equivalency.

Strategically, it inverts victim and perpetrator, neutralizing sympathy for Jews by asserting that they are no better than Nazis.

Not to be overlooked, this tactic also emotionally terrorizes Jews, which is an undeniable reward for the ostensible human rights defenders who behave in this way. Sadism is a massive and unexplored factor in this “dialogue.”

But there is something far more perilous in this Holocaust inversion.

Some of the people engaged in this defilement of Holocaust history do so with a very specific end goal.

A quick history lesson will illustrate …

Before the Holocaust, Jews made up about 1% of the German population. Despite this infinitesimally small number, Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as having enormous, sinister power — a “1%” supposedly controlling or corrupting the “99%.” Rather than undermining the propaganda, the numerical differential was itself proof. So much power for such small numbers!

Nazis blamed Jews for everything negative and portrayed them as the embodiment of evil and disaster. They blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in the First World War, for the Treaty of Versailles, for inflation, unemployment, communism, capitalism, liberalism, modern art, sexual “degeneracy,” and the alleged weakening of German culture.

Jews were useful scapegoats: instead of addressing the root causes of economic collapse, political failure, militarism, or class conflict, Nazis offered one simple enemy.

Naziism took historical antisemitism and supercharged it. Traditionally, whatever was Jewish was considered evil. More than ever before, under the Nazis, that equation inverted. Whatever was evil was cast as distinctively Jewish.

That framing justified the atrocities to come. Boycotts, firings, professional bans, public humiliation, and legal discrimination. Random beatings and coordinated, systemic violence. Segregation. Dispossession. Deportation. Mass murder with the goal of complete genocide.

Now …

The world today is a tragic mess. Even if the world were not already filled with conflict, inequality, tragedy, horrors and sadism, the advent of new technologies in the past couple of decades would bombard us with the worst images and news imaginable. Sadly, the news is overwhelmingly conflictual, tragic, horrific, the perpetrators of inequality and injustice demonstrating depths of sadism rarely seen. Social media and inescapable 24/7 news and commentary magnify that awfulness.

It all seems so hopeless. What can one person do? There are no easy answers.

And yet, it is at times like these that easy answers are most in demand.

And there is always someone ready to meet that demand.

This is why the “pro-Palestinian” movement has succeeded so wildly. In a world filled with incomprehensibly complex tragedies, this one conflict (which is comparatively minor, in terms of casualties among global flashpoints today) serves to concentrate global attention.

Just as the Nazis projected onto Jews every sin, real or imagined, facing the German people, the “pro-Palestinian” movement projects onto Israel every sin (real or imagined) of today’s world: inequality, injustice, racism, imperialism, greed, nationalism, tribalism … it is a catch-all for whatever one loathes. If the puzzle piece doesn’t fit the picture, the Goebbelses of the Palestinian narrative will hammer it until it does.

The Nazis blamed Jews for the worst sins they could conjure.

The Palestinian narrative blames Israel for the worst imaginable sins — except there’s a twist.

The Nazis mainstreamed genocide as a political imperative.

Since 1945, this has been recognized as the greatest crime humankind has ever invented.

And so, of course, it had to be that this greatest crime would soon come to be projected onto Jews.

Despite all evidence, much of the world contends that Palestinians are experiencing “genocide.”

This has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them.

It is a make-believe crime invented to frame the Jewish state.

No evidence required.

All evidence to the contrary discarded.

Returning to the lessons of the past, some of the Germans who fell for this propaganda were, in a sense, victims themselves, brainwashed into believing the worst about Jews.

Some of the “pro-Palestinians” who swallow the “Palestinian genocide” Kool-Aid today are likewise victims of a sort, having ignorantly succumbed to one of history’s biggest and most dangerous lies.

But the instigators of the libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are building a case against Jews — Israelis, yes, but Jews generally, since the polite distinctions the more politically savvy Israel-bashers make are irrelevant to those who invented the strategy.

They are creating a scenario in which Jews are widely accepted as perpetrators of civilization’s greatest evil.

Genocide.

In the interest of preventing a repetition of such atrocities — and in the most convoluted (im)moral inversion imaginable, it is the very lessons of Jewish genocide that are often invoked as justification — Israel is denounced as the agent of the greatest evil.

Many of the people who succumb to this outrageous lie are, in a sense, victims, like the Germans before them who fell for hate propaganda.

But those who invented and do the most to perpetuate the genocide libel know exactly w


hat they are doing.

They are pinning a fake genocide on the Jews in order to “solve” the imaginary genocide by planning a real one.

The prevalent anti-Israel slogan says it all: “By any means necessary.”

They will spread the vicious lie that Jews are perpetrating the worst crime imaginable in order to foment that very crime — genocide — against Jews.

It seems incredible.

But this precise blueprint has been used before. With tremendous success.

Allow me to condense your well-written, heart-felt post.......

"dimocraps are scum"
 
Benderski in essay 'The Genocide That Wasn’t,' points out that labeling Israel’s war in Gaza as “genocide” misuses and weakens the meaning of the term. The author reminds that Israel’s actions, while destructive, lacked the defining intent to exterminate a people. He points to Israel celebrating the war’s end, engaging in negotiations, issuing evacuation warnings, and pausing fighting for hostage exchanges as behavior inconsistent with historical genocides.

The piece points out that Hamas’s tactics—embedding fighters and infrastructure among civilians and operating extensive tunnel networks—made civilian casualties difficult to avoid in a densely populated environment. While acknowledging the immense suffering, destruction, displacement, and loss of life in Gaza, these outcomes do not by themselves prove genocidal intent.

Citing international law and the International Court of Justice’s Bosnia v. Serbia ruling, the essay contends that genocide requires clear evidence that extermination is the only reasonable explanation for a state’s actions. No such proof exists in Gaza.

The essay concludes that the war should instead be understood as a brutal asymmetrical conflict marked by excess, tragedy, and moral failure, but not genocide. It warns that overusing the term “genocide” risks stripping it of its historical and moral significance. "Perhaps, in the end, the only genocide committed here was against the meaning of the word itself."


'The Genocide That Wasn’t.'
Leo Benderski. Times Of Israel. Oct 18, 2025

____

The G propaganda arose days after Genocudak Hamas atrocities:

'NGO Atrocity Inversion: False Accusations of Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing to Distract from Hamas Massacre.'
NGO Monitor. Oct 23, 2023
 
IMG_4083.webp
 
Lol. Do you know anything about Gaza?
There’s a big overlap between people who support Trump’s defense of the Epstein Class and Zionist atrocities in Gaza and for the same uninformed “reasons”
 
Benderski in essay 'The Genocide That Wasn’t,' points out that labeling Israel’s war in Gaza as “genocide” misuses and weakens the meaning of the term. The author reminds that Israel’s actions, while destructive, lacked the defining intent to exterminate a people. He points to Israel celebrating the war’s end, engaging in negotiations, issuing evacuation warnings, and pausing fighting for hostage exchanges as behavior inconsistent with historical genocides.

The piece points out that Hamas’s tactics—embedding fighters and infrastructure among civilians and operating extensive tunnel networks—made civilian casualties difficult to avoid in a densely populated environment. While acknowledging the immense suffering, destruction, displacement, and loss of life in Gaza, these outcomes do not by themselves prove genocidal intent.

Citing international law and the International Court of Justice’s Bosnia v. Serbia ruling, the essay contends that genocide requires clear evidence that extermination is the only reasonable explanation for a state’s actions. No such proof exists in Gaza.

The essay concludes that the war should instead be understood as a brutal asymmetrical conflict marked by excess, tragedy, and moral failure, but not genocide. It warns that overusing the term “genocide” risks stripping it of its historical and moral significance. "Perhaps, in the end, the only genocide committed here was against the meaning of the word itself."


'The Genocide That Wasn’t.'
Leo Benderski. Times Of Israel. Oct 18, 2025

____

The G propaganda arose days after Genocudak Hamas atrocities:

'NGO Atrocity Inversion: False Accusations of Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing to Distract from Hamas Massacre.'
NGO Monitor. Oct 23, 2023
If it’s true Israel has murdered 680,000 Palestinians, do you still support it.
 
Here is my comment:

The poster is right that the main culprit are those that push the lie, however, not all who tend to 'believe" it are really innocent.
Deep down most know it's a bluff.


_


WHO INVENTED THE GENOCIDE LIE — AND WHY?
The make-believe “Palestinian genocide” has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them. Quite the opposite.
Pat's BEATEN WITH A SHTICK.
May 04, 2026

It’s a lie. But why?

I don’t invoke Nazis very often. That history is so massive and horrific, its lessons so sacred, that to flippantly throw around accusations of, or comparison with, Naziism is to defile the memory of the victims. Of course, that does not stop those who equate everything they don’t like with Hitler.

That’s bad enough.

Far, far worse, is the Holocaust inversion that has become routine in the world today: the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

To casually toss around Nazi analogies is to defile a people’s history. To go a step further and calculatingly invert that history and project onto the victims the crimes that were perpetrated on their people is a mindboggling depth of sadistic inhumanity.

That it comes mostly from people who sanctimoniously claim the flag of antiracism, humanitarianism, and wokeness heaps the salt of audacity on the wound of atrocity.

However despicable this phenomenon, it succeeds in minimizing Jewish history and experience with genocide. So, when I am moved to make a relevant comparison with that past, the power is diminished, because this history has been negligently thrown around so habitually. Which is precisely the point.

Abuse of Holocaust memory plays multiple roles in the current discourse.

It diminishes the history itself, reducing Jewish experiences with discrimination — which are undeniably among the worst in human history — to mundane misfortune. It implies that Jews overreact about past traumas, which means we can ignore their pleas for contemporary tolerance and warnings about deteriorating social climates. It assumes that Jews exploit their history for political gain — and defiantly asserts that two can play at that game. Further, if Jewish fears are really just an overreaction, there is no justification for Israel as a refuge for imperiled Jews. Moreover, it flattens unique Jewish experiences into an indifferent “all people have suffered” equivalency.

Strategically, it inverts victim and perpetrator, neutralizing sympathy for Jews by asserting that they are no better than Nazis.

Not to be overlooked, this tactic also emotionally terrorizes Jews, which is an undeniable reward for the ostensible human rights defenders who behave in this way. Sadism is a massive and unexplored factor in this “dialogue.”

But there is something far more perilous in this Holocaust inversion.

Some of the people engaged in this defilement of Holocaust history do so with a very specific end goal.

A quick history lesson will illustrate …

Before the Holocaust, Jews made up about 1% of the German population. Despite this infinitesimally small number, Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as having enormous, sinister power — a “1%” supposedly controlling or corrupting the “99%.” Rather than undermining the propaganda, the numerical differential was itself proof. So much power for such small numbers!

Nazis blamed Jews for everything negative and portrayed them as the embodiment of evil and disaster. They blamed Jews for Germany’s defeat in the First World War, for the Treaty of Versailles, for inflation, unemployment, communism, capitalism, liberalism, modern art, sexual “degeneracy,” and the alleged weakening of German culture.

Jews were useful scapegoats: instead of addressing the root causes of economic collapse, political failure, militarism, or class conflict, Nazis offered one simple enemy.

Naziism took historical antisemitism and supercharged it. Traditionally, whatever was Jewish was considered evil. More than ever before, under the Nazis, that equation inverted. Whatever was evil was cast as distinctively Jewish.

That framing justified the atrocities to come. Boycotts, firings, professional bans, public humiliation, and legal discrimination. Random beatings and coordinated, systemic violence. Segregation. Dispossession. Deportation. Mass murder with the goal of complete genocide.

Now …

The world today is a tragic mess. Even if the world were not already filled with conflict, inequality, tragedy, horrors and sadism, the advent of new technologies in the past couple of decades would bombard us with the worst images and news imaginable. Sadly, the news is overwhelmingly conflictual, tragic, horrific, the perpetrators of inequality and injustice demonstrating depths of sadism rarely seen. Social media and inescapable 24/7 news and commentary magnify that awfulness.

It all seems so hopeless. What can one person do? There are no easy answers.

And yet, it is at times like these that easy answers are most in demand.

And there is always someone ready to meet that demand.

This is why the “pro-Palestinian” movement has succeeded so wildly. In a world filled with incomprehensibly complex tragedies, this one conflict (which is comparatively minor, in terms of casualties among global flashpoints today) serves to concentrate global attention.

Just as the Nazis projected onto Jews every sin, real or imagined, facing the German people, the “pro-Palestinian” movement projects onto Israel every sin (real or imagined) of today’s world: inequality, injustice, racism, imperialism, greed, nationalism, tribalism … it is a catch-all for whatever one loathes. If the puzzle piece doesn’t fit the picture, the Goebbelses of the Palestinian narrative will hammer it until it does.

The Nazis blamed Jews for the worst sins they could conjure.

The Palestinian narrative blames Israel for the worst imaginable sins — except there’s a twist.

The Nazis mainstreamed genocide as a political imperative.

Since 1945, this has been recognized as the greatest crime humankind has ever invented.

And so, of course, it had to be that this greatest crime would soon come to be projected onto Jews.

Despite all evidence, much of the world contends that Palestinians are experiencing “genocide.”

This has nothing to do with Palestinians or what is happening to them.

It is a make-believe crime invented to frame the Jewish state.

No evidence required.

All evidence to the contrary discarded.

Returning to the lessons of the past, some of the Germans who fell for this propaganda were, in a sense, victims themselves, brainwashed into believing the worst about Jews.

Some of the “pro-Palestinians” who swallow the “Palestinian genocide” Kool-Aid today are likewise victims of a sort, having ignorantly succumbed to one of history’s biggest and most dangerous lies.

But the instigators of the libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are building a case against Jews — Israelis, yes, but Jews generally, since the polite distinctions the more politically savvy Israel-bashers make are irrelevant to those who invented the strategy.

They are creating a scenario in which Jews are widely accepted as perpetrators of civilization’s greatest evil.

Genocide.

In the interest of preventing a repetition of such atrocities — and in the most convoluted (im)moral inversion imaginable, it is the very lessons of Jewish genocide that are often invoked as justification — Israel is denounced as the agent of the greatest evil.

Many of the people who succumb to this outrageous lie are, in a sense, victims, like the Germans before them who fell for hate propaganda.

But those who invented and do the most to perpetuate the genocide libel know exactly what they are doing.

They are pinning a fake genocide on the Jews in order to “solve” the imaginary genocide by planning a real one.

The prevalent anti-Israel slogan says it all: “By any means necessary.”

They will spread the vicious lie that Jews are perpetrating the worst crime imaginable in order to foment that very crime — genocide — against Jews.

It seems incredible.

But this precise blueprint has been used before. With tremendous success.

"Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza continues unabated despite ceasefire​

"More than a month after a ceasefire was announced and all living Israeli hostages were released, Israeli authorities are still committing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, by continuing to deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction, without signalling any change in their intent, said Amnesty International today."

Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza continues unabated despite ceasefire
 
Sam Harris Gave the Greatest Response to the “Genocide in Gaza” Lie'. Leah Rosenberg, Israel Unwired, May 28, 2026.

What the Zionist Entity is doing in Palestine meets the UN Definition of Genocide.

The same standard they applied to the Balkans, the same standard they've applied to Rwanda.
 
JoeB131 said:
What the Zionist Entity ..

Of course joeb131 would

CHOOSE TO

say that.
It's called:.

confirmation bias.

"Entity" he said

Just like the apartheid propagandists


Pallyweid all the way.
 
Last edited:
Just sayin'

Just sayin' - Facts, history, against racism, bigotry.

WWII: A "random" newspaper page 7/10/1942​


(Posted in May 31, 2026)

bf46657ef4944857c3c342b52d15a20566b49777.jpg

The Canadian Jewish Chronicle

Jewish Chronicle, July 10, 1942

Palestinian Press Wants Arms Pledge Implemented​

JERUSALEM (JPS-Palcor) — Insofar as rigid military and Government censorship would permit, Davar, Hebrew labor daily, editorially urged that pledges made in London for maximum defense opportunities to the Jews of Palestine be translated into concrete action.

Referring to a statement in the House of Commons by Colonial Undersecretary Harold MacMillan that measures required in Palestine for the prosecution of the war and insurance of internal security were being taken, Davar observed:

"This reply should not remain a mere formality. Its meaning in this hour must be the granting of a chance to tens of thousands of Jews not to remain idle while danger is approaching their homeland. There are tens of thousands whom it is not yet possible to withdraw from production for immediate co-option in the fighting services — but, in the meantime, they should be trained in order to be ready to defend the country when the time comes. All factors concerned are bound to implement Mr. Macmillan’s solemn reply actively and concretely."

Haifa Dedicates Its New Town Hall​

HAIFA (JPS-Palcor) — This harbor city, scene of feverish activity in preparation of defense measures, took on a temporary festival atmosphere as the new Town Hall was dedicated by High Commissioner Sir Harold MacMichael as "a worthy symbol of the coming glory."

The spirit of the city was reflected in the hopeful talks at the dedication exercises even though Haifa had experienced its first alert in many weeks that very morning, when hostile aircraft was reported approaching the city.

The occasion was marked by an address in Hebrew by the Mayor of Haifa, Shabbatai Levy, who reviewed the development of the municipality since its establishment in 1882, when the Town Hall had housed one room and had a staff of one clerk. The population then had numbered 4,000 as against well over 110,000 today.

In his address, as he formally opened the structure, the High Commissioner said that future generations would commemorate the vision and civic zeal of the pioneers.

Save Palestine Jews From Nazi Gas Chambers — Liberal London Weekly Urges​

LONDON (JTA) — It is the duty of the British government to "preserve the Jewish population of Palestine from Himmler's gas chambers and firing squads," it was stated this week by the New Statesman and Nation, leading British liberal weekly, in an article on the situation in the Middle East.

Discussing the military aspects of the campaign, the publication declares that "instead of wasting men and material in attempting to delay the occupation of Egypt, all strength should be concentrated on Palestine, Cyprus, Syria and the Persian Gulf."

Lord Strabolgi, Laborite peer, writing in the Evening Standard, suggested that Haifa be used as a base for the British Mediterranean fleet. "Haifa has a magnificent harbor though lacking in engineering facilities," he states, "and half a million Jews can be relied upon to guard the hinterland."

Arab Students Ask Rommel to "Free" Arabs From Jews​

GENEVA (JPS) — In another one of the many planted Arab "messages" to Nazi General Rommel, who is leading the Axis fight against the United Nations forces in the Middle East, Arab students in Paris have cabled congratulations to the German leader and have asked him to "free the Arabs from the Jewish-British yoke."

It is reported here that Haj Amin el Husseini, ex-Mufti of Jerusalem, now in Berlin, sent a similar cable to the Nazi military leader.

Renewed Wave of Nazi Terror Expected in Poland​

ZURICH (JTA) — A renewed wave of terror against Jews and Poles in Nazi-held Poland was predicted here this week as the result of a report in the Nazi newspaper Krakauer Zeitung, which arrived here from Cracow, that Hans Frank, Nazi governor for Poland, has held "an important conference" with all security chiefs and heads of local police forces in the occupied territory.
_

Source
 
15th post
 
The only side that is happy and SEEKS about Arab casualties, is the very genocidal Arab "palestine" Islamofascism side:

Nawaf Al-Takrouri, Chairman Of The Palestinian Scholars Abroad Association Linked To Hamas And Muslim Brotherhood: No 'Reasonable Muslim' Can Criticize October 7 After The 'Fantastic Gains'; Liberating Al-Aqsa Will Require One Million Martyrs From The Entire Muslim World-Gaza's Devastation Is A 'Natural Price' For Liberation.
May 19, 2026
#12795 | 01:36
Dr. Nawaf Al-Takrouri, said in a May 19, 2026 interview on the .. YouTube channel that no "reasonable Muslim" can criticize the October 7, 2023 "Al-Aqsa Flood" attack after the "fantastic gains" it produced around the world. Al-Takrouri is the chairman of the Palestinian Scholars Abroad association and a member of the board of trustees of the Muslim Brotherhood- linked, Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), and has also been referred to as a Hamas founder, leader, and former member.
He said that the recent achievements of the Palestinian caye came at the cost of bloodshed and destruction but argued that the liberation of Al-Aqsa Mosque
requires sacrifices beyond 70,000 dead, 150,000 wounded, and the destruction of Gaza.
He went on to say that liberating Al-Aqsa Mosque may require one million martyrs, but that it would be a disgrace for the Islamic nation if all of them came only from Gaza, rather than the entire Muslim world. "This is the plan," he said. He added that the mujahideen had already placed the liberation of Al-Aqsa "on track," and described the devastation in Gaza as "a natural price to pay for the launch of the liberation."
 
the accusation that Jews (Israelis) are perpetrating on non-Jews (Palestinians) something akin to what the Nazis perpetrated on Jews.

You moan continually about that accusation but do not dare to seriously respond to it .
The simple fact is that so many top German Nazis were Jews.

Starting with some of the "Big Boys" -- Hitler , Himmler and Goebbels .
And the reason that Jews never respond to that assertion is that there is no sane , rational response available.
It has been made into a taboo subject . Deliberately .

Hitler's Genealogy.

It is nearly nine years since Miles Mathis published his paper and no expert has ever dared to publicly question his findings .
They are either openly ignored or aggressively dismissed as though the very thoughts are impossible and unclean and unworthy of discussion .
Denial based on silence and deafness .


There might have been a Holocaust , but if there was one it was Jews who were both the leading Perpetrators and Victims .

Of course the vast majority of people are astonished by the claim . And often disgusted .
It is one of the most suppressed " secrets" that exists .

And Jews go mentally berserk if their cover is questioned and blown .
As doubtless you will .
 
Back
Top Bottom