protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,963
- 22,037
- 2,250
The Supreme court does. They could have rejected the case. They took it.No one cares.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Supreme court does. They could have rejected the case. They took it.No one cares.
FALSE! We were better off. For one example, there was much more fresh water per capita (especially in the dry western states).Well, you have the right to be wrong about that. Were we any better off with a tiny population in the past? No.
I have no problem with the 14th Amendment. But, of course, I am not a Republican, so I support and defend the entire Constitution. I even honer oaths, taken. Promises made, and marriage vows.Why did you bother to quote my post?
Do you have any idea of just how disgusting the process was for "ratifying" (which really didn't happen) the 14th.
We don't know that yet. You are speculating.No. But they were still smart enough to not buy into the Solicitor General's BS. It was obvious, and it was the reason Trump didn't hang around.
looks like the Supreme court has no fear of posters here, me too, of making decisions for the supreme courtha ha Oh, so kids of ambassadors and diplomats are not OK, but fence cutters & climbers, tunnel diggers, smugglees in car trunks, and caravan invaders all are OK, huh ?
You can go back to sleep now.![]()
Talking about the process.I have no problem with the 14th Amendment. But, of course, I am not a Republican, so I support and defend the entire Constitution. I even honer oaths, taken. Promises made, and marriage vows.
So only diplomats arent "subject to jurisdiction thereof"? Why would they be the only ones not included? I also dont see "diplomats" mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.It was meant to distinguish diplomats sent here by other countries. This has been explained numerous times to those of you incapable of reading.
No such thing.Go watch the cow jump over the moon.
There would be hurdles to verify citizenship , however a unique association between an individual us citizen and a social security number is fairly well documented and the disposition of verification is likely to be readily available .Yeah....I'm going to agree with you.
I can't imagine a young couple trying to prove their citizenship so that their child will gain citizenship.
It doesn't, not for at least 20 years anyway.NO to birthright citizenship if it leads to permanent citizenship for the illegal parents. ...
You do understand though that this whole issue was created by hospital nursing staff." Basic Criteria Of Protection Collective State "
* Understandable And Resolvable *
There would be hurdles to verify citizenship , however a unique association between an individual us citizen and a social security number is fairly well documented and the disposition of verification is likely to be readily available .
Us citizens are entitled to a difference between subject to and subject of , for safety , security , autonomy and solvency of its republic .
All concur that individuals whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , as undocumented sojourners , are not entitled to positive liberties such as medicaid , which affirms that such individuals are not subjects of us jurisdiction , though such individuals are subject to us jurisdiction .
Except by an act of diplomacy , as an agreement between us government and other governments , or between us government and an individual , such than an individual becomes a subject by title in us legal immigration system , and therefore a subject of us jurisdiction , the live birth of progeny on us soil , from such individuals does not qualify , does not qualify the offspring for jus soli citizenship , and is to be awarded jus originis citizenship to maternal country of origin .
No, it's not. Not according to the current, century and a half understanding of the Constitution.In order to give birth to a citizen you must be one in the first place. Thats [sic] what the law states
The civil rights act states exactly that. Not under any other jurusdictionNo, it's not. Not according to the current, century and a half understanding of the Constitution.
"Other jurisdiction" like the Constitution of the United States of America?The civil rights act states exactly that. Not under any other jurusdiction [sic]
You do understand though that this whole issue was created by hospital nursing staff.
And a bit of regulatory agency over reach.
Because newborn babies are now issued a SS number as well as a birth certificate. And nursing staff just pushes the buttons to make these things happen. They just follow orders and procedures....because of the many and hefty regulations surrounding their careers.
So nursing staff began issuing SS numbers to ALL babies regardless of the legal immigration status of parents....indigent mothers arent that uncommon....and issuing SS cards means nothing to nursing staff anymore than the child's birth certificate....they likely are caring more about whether the baby's mother is nursing correctly or needs something like infant first aid training/CPR.
Never understanding they have caused a catastrophe with immigration due to the regulations imposed upon them forcing them to issue such documents.
(This is exactly how the crisis came into existence)
These illegal immigrants now having a citizen baby....tell ALL their family and friends back home their good fortune and how they now have an "in" to stay in America without getting kicked out. Which in turn eventually causes an avalanche of pregnant women coming to America to have babies...for free....and gaining citizenship all at the same time. (In Mexico you have to pay for healthcare....no indigent healthcare system whatsoever)
Which is why today a little over 9% of all live births in America are to illegal alien women.
Even if they dont stay in America....they at least show up for the free healthcare.
An agency of government service would need to be in place to avert cart blanch issuance of jus soli citizenship , to live births of individuals , whom are not a subject by title in us legal immigration system , whom are therefore not subjects of us jurisdiction , and whom would receive jus originis citizenship to the maternal country of origin .You do understand though that this whole issue was created by hospital nursing staff.
And a bit of regulatory agency over reach.
Because newborn babies are now issued a SS number as well as a birth certificate. And nursing staff just pushes the buttons to make these things happen. They just follow orders and procedures....because of the many and hefty regulations surrounding their careers.
So nursing staff began issuing SS numbers to ALL babies regardless of the legal immigration status of parents....indigent mothers arent that uncommon....and issuing SS cards means nothing to nursing staff anymore than the child's birth certificate....they likely are caring more about whether the baby's mother is nursing correctly or needs something like infant first aid training/CPR.
Never understanding they have caused a catastrophe with immigration due to the regulations imposed upon them forcing them to issue such documents.
It is astounding how individuals claim distress as excuses for escaping a plight , only to maintain the original beliefs and methods of behavior which provisioned the conditions blamed for the distress and plight .(This is exactly how the crisis came into existence)
These illegal immigrants now having a citizen baby....tell ALL their family and friends back home their good fortune and how they now have an "in" to stay in America without getting kicked out. Which in turn eventually causes an avalanche of pregnant women coming to America to have babies...for free....and gaining citizenship all at the same time. (In Mexico you have to pay for healthcare....no indigent healthcare system whatsoever)
Which is why today a little over 9% of all live births in America are to illegal alien women.
Even if they dont stay in America....they at least show up for the free healthcare.