Trump's Birthright citizenship E.O. is spot on according to our Founders

johnwk

Platinum Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
5,184
Reaction score
2,803
Points
930
.

From the very beginning of our nation's founding, and when debating our Nations` first RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790, page ll56, Annals of Congress Representative Burk emphatically states the introduction of some foreign nationals ought to be considered “. . . as a high misdemeanor.”


Mr. BURKE thought it of importance to fill the country with useful men, such as farmers, mechanics, and manufacturers, and, therefore, would hold out every encouragement to them to emigrate to America. This class he would receive on liberal terms; and he was satisfied there would be room enough for them, and for their posterity, for five hundred years to come. There was another class of men, whom he did not think useful, and he did not care what impediments were thrown in their way; such as your European merchants, and factors of merchants, who come with a view of remaining so long as will enable them to acquire a fortune, and then they will leave the country, and carry off all their property with them. These people injure us more than they do us good, and, except in this last sentiment, I can compare them to nothing but leeches. They stick to us until they get their fill of our best blood, and then they fall off and leave us. I look upon the privilege of an American citizen to be an honorable one, and it ought not to be thrown away upon such people. There is another class also that I would interdict, that is, the convicts and criminals which they pour out of British jails. I wish sincerely some mode could be adopted to prevent the importation of such; but that, perhaps, is not in our power; the introduction of them ought to be considered as a high misdemeanor.



There is nothing un-constitutional with respect to President Trump's E. O. Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship

In fact, changing current federal policy as stated in Trump's E.O., is not only constitutional, but is in total harmony with our federal government's first duty to advance the "general welfare" of the United states and her citizens.

If a majority members on our S.C. strikes down Trump's E.O. and creates a new category of natural born citizenship for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil, they will be acting in defiance of our Constitution's command which puts the people's elected representatives, Congress and President, in charge of setting public policy.

.JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story
 
According to the Founders? Really?

You asked em right?

He found a speech from Edmund Burke. Of course, he ignores the rebuttal from Jackson. Of course, it don't make a damn what the founders think since we are talking about an amendment to the Constitution passed after all the founders were dead. The applicable place to go would be the debates over the 14th amendment but the right won't go there.
 
According to the Founders? Really?

You asked em right?
I read the miracle they crafted.

Congress, the people's elected representatives, are granted exclusive power "To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization" (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4), and with reference to the 14th Amendment Section 5, it delegates to Congress, the people's elected representatives, a "power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of" the 14th Amendment.

Unwritten policy, and only unwritten policy, now recognizes the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national, born on American soil, as a citizen of the United States upon birth. If I am in error, quote the statute by which the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national, born on American soil, is granted U.S. citizenship upon birth.

Changing current federal policy as stated in Trump's E.O., is not only constitutional, but is in total harmony with our federal government's first duty to advance the "general welfare" of the United states and her citizens.

If a majority members on our S.C. strikes down Trump's E.O. and creates a new category of natural born citizenship for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil, they will be acting in defiance of our Constitution's command which puts the people's elected representatives, Congress and President, in charge of setting public policy.
 
He found a speech from Edmund Burke. Of course, he ignores the rebuttal from Jackson. Of course, it don't make a damn what the founders think since we are talking about an amendment to the Constitution passed after all the founders were dead. The applicable place to go would be the debates over the 14th amendment but the right won't go there.
The racist and corrupt Democrat Party is conducting a demographic war against American Citizens.
We have a constitutional right to control our borders and immigration.
 
He found a speech from Edmund Burke. Of course, he ignores the rebuttal from Jackson. Of course, it don't make a damn what the founders think since we are talking about an amendment to the Constitution passed after all the founders were dead. The applicable place to go would be the debates over the 14th amendment but the right won't go there.
winston if there was a woman from another country who was 8 months pregnant standing at the entrance to come in here,would you let her in or tell her to come back after her pregnancy is over?...
 
The racist and corrupt Democrat Party is conducting a demographic war against American Citizens.
We have a constitutional right to control our borders and immigration.
I swear, I don't know if there is anything more ignorant than that claim. So, Democrats are racist yet Republicans want to keep out people of color. But you are correct, WE have a right to control our borders. Not the big fat orange turd. In short, Congress controls immigration, not the executive branch.
 
I swear, I don't know if there is anything more ignorant than that claim. So, Democrats are racist yet Republicans want to keep out people of color. But you are correct, WE have a right to control our borders. Not the big fat orange turd. In short, Congress controls immigration, not the executive branch.
Bullshit.

Search Assist
The President of the United States has significant authority over immigration policy, including the ability to enforce immigration laws, set refugee admissions, and implement travel bans
 
Bullshit.

Search Assist
The President of the United States has significant authority over immigration policy, including the ability to enforce immigration laws, set refugee admissions, and implement travel bans
Nobody says he doesn't. But he sure as hell doesn't have the right to change the %@#&(*&%@ Constitution.
 
Nobody says he doesn't. But he sure as hell doesn't have the right to change the %@#&(*&%@ Constitution.
He isn't. He is asking the SCOTUS to check the legality of birthright citizenship. Nothing wrong with that.
 
Nobody says he doesn't. But he sure as hell doesn't have the right to change the %@#&(*&%@ Constitution.
Trump's Executive Order Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship – The White House is setting public policy and is not violating any terms set forth in our Constitution.

Currently, unwritten federal policy, and only unwritten policy, now recognizes the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national, born on American soil, as a natural born citizen of the United States.

If you disagree, substantiate your claim with the federal statute stating the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national, born on American soil, is granted the status of a natural born citizen of the United States.
 
Back
Top Bottom