Birthright Citizenship is Teed Up Again

[Mac-7]

No unky; it’s not fake news. You simply can’t refute it despite the fact that you don’t like it.

You cant deport anchor babies

And thats very helpful to the pro illegal alien shills

 

[Mac-7]

Have the amendment submitted by tour congressional reps and let it go forward. Any other action is a waste of time and money.

I dont think we need an amendment

 

[Mac-7]

You do of course know there are 9 justices, not 5, and they are all not elected. At least 5 have to agree on that reimagination. Another error, but a minor one.

Ot only takes 5

 

[Mac-7]

Hey lady, you look pretty fat! You could be pregnant, so no entry for you.

A pregnancy test takes 5 minutes

 

[BackAgain]

You cant deport anchor babies

And thats very helpful to the pro illegal alien shills

True. For as long as any person (other than kids of ambassadors and so forth) automatically get the designation of “U.S. citizen” merely because they happen to have been born on U.S. soil, the kid can’t be deported.

 

[Unkotare]

That’s a citation to webpage which doesn’t say what you think it says. Quote it.

Read it.

 

[BackAgain]

Read it.

I did. I see nothing supportive of your claim. This is why I believe you misread or misunderstood it.

This is also why I asked you to quote it. It’s your claim. Citing to a wall of words doesn’t support you interpretation.

 

[Unkotare]

That’s a citation to webpage which doesn’t say what you think it says. Quote it.

"A U.S. citizen who is at least 21 years or older may also petition for the following relatives:• Parents;• Brothers or sisters"

"Filing a Form I-130 and proving a qualifying relationship gives your relative a place in line with others waiting to immigrate from the same country or region based on the same type of relationship."

"• If your petition has been approved, and your relatives are currently in the United States after making a legal entry (and they meet certain other requirements), they may be able to file applications with USCIS to adjust to permanent resident status."

"Can my relative wait in the United States until becoming a permanent resident? No. If your relative is outside the United States, filing an I-130 does not allow your relative to live or work in the United States. An I-130 petition only establishes your relationship with your relative. Your relative should wait outside the United States to immigrate legally."

"Does filing a relative petition commit me to anything? Yes. Under the law, each person who immigrates based on a relative’s petition must have a financial sponsor."

 

[Unkotare]

I did. I see nothing supportive of your claim. This is why I believe you misread or misunderstood it.

This is also why I asked you to quote it. It’s your claim. Citing to a wall of words doesn’t support you interpretation.

You very obviously didn’t read it.

 

[BackAgain]

"A U.S. citizen who is at least 21 years or older may also petition for the following relatives:• Parents;• Brothers or sisters"

"Filing a Form I-130 and proving a qualifying relationship gives your relative a place in line with others waiting to immigrate from the same country or region based on the same type of relationship."

"• If your petition has been approved, and your relatives are currently in the United States after making a legal entry (and they meet certain other requirements), they may be able to file applications with USCIS to adjust to permanent resident status."

"Can my relative wait in the United States until becoming a permanent resident? No. If your relative is outside the United States, filing an I-130 does not allow your relative to live or work in the United States. An I-130 petition only establishes your relationship with your relative. Your relative should wait outside the United States to immigrate legally."

"Does filing a relative petition commit me to anything? Yes. Under the law, each person who immigrates based on a relative’s petition must have a financial sponsor."

Ok. Thanks.

 

[BackAgain]

You very obviously didn’t read it.

Wrong again, unky.

But I did miss that line.

Even a moron should be able to think those two things simultaneously.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

True

You were blaming the Civil War generation

Thank you. Next!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I dont think we need an amendment

Well SCOTUS has said you do.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I did. I see nothing supportive of your claim. This is why I believe you misread or misunderstood it.

This is also why I asked you to quote it. It’s your claim. Citing to a wall of words doesn’t support you interpretation.

Unk is and I was a teacher. We knew you couldn't read!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Ot only takes 5

You said:
There is no clear text that 5 unelected demigods in black robes cant reimagine.

In effect, they are all elected as they must be confirmed by the Senate.

There are 9 demigods in black robes and if two abstain, it only takes 4. You are incorrect. End of statement.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

https://www.npr.org/2018/08/10/637371714/first-ladys-parents-become-u-s-citizens-thanks-to-chain-migration

First Lady's Parents Become U.S. Citizens Thanks To 'Chain Migration'

The lawyer acknowledged that the Knavses had obtained citizenship via the very pathway that their son-in-law, the president, has so publicly denounced.

Legally because she was legally admitted. Anchor babies as you call them don't count.

 

[Care4all]

Legally because she was legally admitted. Anchor babies as you call them don't count.

You should research how she was "legally" admitted.....

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

A pregnancy test takes 5 minutes

You do know that the airlines enforce I believe a 7-month rule in most cases. They don't waive it and need a doctor's statement. At least they did when my wife was pregnant, but that was 30 years ago.

Think a tourist flying into the US with intent to birth a citizen is going to have that?

 

[Care4all]

And if they wanted it to apply to illegal aliens they would have pointed them out

There weren't any illegals per say during their time...I don't think?

....we were trying to colonize as much as we could....people were welcomed, as long as they toiled the soil....

 

[Mac-7]

Well SCOTUS has said you do.

This SC has not said that

The initiative to close the anchor baby loophole could fail in the SC

if you, me, or anyone else thinks we can read the minds of 5 ego driven unelected demigods in black robes think again

We cant

But we have to try to persuade them and now is the best chance to do so