presonorek
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Oh, I get it now. You're a Reid Hoffman employee pretending to be a Russian Bot.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, I get it now. You're a Reid Hoffman employee pretending to be a Russian Bot.
No they have not or perhaps you can link to the court case that allows me to own a nuke?It is Illegal for a citizen to own a nuke and it is perfectly legal to enforce that law Strategic weapons are not personal weapons.In the Constitution it is illegal for a State to own an armed Naval vessel which in 1789 was the only strategic weapon we had. So no stretch to include individuals in that ban. Be specific and list for us ANY Judge that disagrees? As for road blocks they also are perfectly legal nd YES cops can ask for and recieve ID if you don't provide it they can hold you till they establish your identity also perfectly legal.Can the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendment ever be changed without creating a new government?
The 2nd Amendment allows citizens to own nuclear bombs.
The 4th Amendment prohibits road blocks designed to catch drunk drivers.
The 5th Amendment allows people to ignore questions from cops.
Americans aren't the same in 2019 as they were in 1789. There were no nuclear bombs to consider. There were no intoxicated persons driving 2000 lb. hunks of metal at 60mph. There were no police officers. (Maybe a sheriff or two but not a police force like we know today) I think all Americans agree that you shouldn't own nuclear weapons, cops should capture drunk drivers and people should answer cops questions. However, aren't the Bill of Rights written in stone so to speak? They can't ever be removed? or can they? Most Americans in 2019 disagree with the objective if the 2nd, 4th and 5th Amendment.
I call Shenanigans.
Please provide a link to anyone other than a fringe kook who thinks individuals should have nuclear bombs.
It was our fringe kook forefathers who thought the people should be militarily capable of defeating the government if it ever stopped too far out of bounds. We as Americans don't believe that any more.
Second Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Courts have disagreed with your finding.
You said all roadblocks were illegal and they are not.It is Illegal for a citizen to own a nuke and it is perfectly legal to enforce that law Strategic weapons are not personal weapons.In the Constitution it is illegal for a State to own an armed Naval vessel which in 1789 was the only strategic weapon we had. So no stretch to include individuals in that ban. Be specific and list for us ANY Judge that disagrees? As for road blocks they also are perfectly legal nd YES cops can ask for and recieve ID if you don't provide it they can hold you till they establish your identity also perfectly legal.I call Shenanigans.
Please provide a link to anyone other than a fringe kook who thinks individuals should have nuclear bombs.
It was our fringe kook forefathers who thought the people should be militarily capable of defeating the government if it ever stopped too far out of bounds. We as Americans don't believe that any more.
Second Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Courts have disagreed with your finding.
Really? Link to a court decision that says individuals have the right to own a nuclear bomb?
Road blocks for the purpose of seizing drugs has been determined illegal.
And the First Amendment allows everyone to post ignorant, ridiculous nonsense such as this.Can the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendment ever be changed without creating a new government?
The 2nd Amendment allows citizens to own nuclear bombs.
The 4th Amendment prohibits road blocks designed to catch drunk drivers.
The 5th Amendment allows people to ignore questions from cops.
Americans aren't the same in 2019 as they were in 1789. There were no nuclear bombs to consider. There were no intoxicated persons driving 2000 lb. hunks of metal at 60mph. There were no police officers. (Maybe a sheriff or two but not a police force like we know today) I think all Americans agree that you shouldn't own nuclear weapons, cops should capture drunk drivers and people should answer cops questions. However, aren't the Bill of Rights written in stone so to speak? They can't ever be removed? or can they? Most Americans in 2019 disagree with the objective if the 2nd, 4th and 5th Amendment.
Speak for yourself.Can the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendment ever be changed without creating a new government?
The 2nd Amendment allows citizens to own nuclear bombs.
The 4th Amendment prohibits road blocks designed to catch drunk drivers.
The 5th Amendment allows people to ignore questions from cops.
Americans aren't the same in 2019 as they were in 1789. There were no nuclear bombs to consider. There were no intoxicated persons driving 2000 lb. hunks of metal at 60mph. There were no police officers. (Maybe a sheriff or two but not a police force like we know today) I think all Americans agree that you shouldn't own nuclear weapons, cops should capture drunk drivers and people should answer cops questions. However, aren't the Bill of Rights written in stone so to speak? They can't ever be removed? or can they? Most Americans in 2019 disagree with the objective if the 2nd, 4th and 5th Amendment.
I call Shenanigans.
Please provide a link to anyone other than a fringe kook who thinks individuals should have nuclear bombs.
It was our fringe kook forefathers who thought the people should be militarily capable of defeating the government if it ever stopped too far out of bounds. We as Americans don't believe that any more.
Second Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
You're a blithering moron.
Keep and bear arms refers to personal weapons, not large ordnance such as cannons (or nuclear bombs). Learn something about history, swampy.
Did you see the part where I said we as Americans don't believe that any more?
And the First Amendment allows everyone to post ignorant, ridiculous nonsense such as this.Can the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendment ever be changed without creating a new government?
The 2nd Amendment allows citizens to own nuclear bombs.
The 4th Amendment prohibits road blocks designed to catch drunk drivers.
The 5th Amendment allows people to ignore questions from cops.
Americans aren't the same in 2019 as they were in 1789. There were no nuclear bombs to consider. There were no intoxicated persons driving 2000 lb. hunks of metal at 60mph. There were no police officers. (Maybe a sheriff or two but not a police force like we know today) I think all Americans agree that you shouldn't own nuclear weapons, cops should capture drunk drivers and people should answer cops questions. However, aren't the Bill of Rights written in stone so to speak? They can't ever be removed? or can they? Most Americans in 2019 disagree with the objective if the 2nd, 4th and 5th Amendment.
False. 2A jurisprudence very clearly says otherwise.Can the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendment ever be changed without creating a new government?
The 2nd Amendment allows citizens to own nuclear bombs.
False. DUI checkpoints are common.The 4th Amendment prohibits road blocks designed to catch drunk drivers.
True. So what?The 5th Amendment allows people to ignore questions from cops.
Amendments can be repealed without changing anything
You said all roadblocks were illegal and they are not.It is Illegal for a citizen to own a nuke and it is perfectly legal to enforce that law Strategic weapons are not personal weapons.In the Constitution it is illegal for a State to own an armed Naval vessel which in 1789 was the only strategic weapon we had. So no stretch to include individuals in that ban. Be specific and list for us ANY Judge that disagrees? As for road blocks they also are perfectly legal nd YES cops can ask for and recieve ID if you don't provide it they can hold you till they establish your identity also perfectly legal.It was our fringe kook forefathers who thought the people should be militarily capable of defeating the government if it ever stopped too far out of bounds. We as Americans don't believe that any more.
Second Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Courts have disagreed with your finding.
Really? Link to a court decision that says individuals have the right to own a nuclear bomb?
Road blocks for the purpose of seizing drugs has been determined illegal.
Nonsense.Perhaps some amendments should come with an expiration date. Customs and traditions change as people change and some should go through a renewal process after a time period.
How many amendments have the court's declared expired because their time has run out?Nonsense.Perhaps some amendments should come with an expiration date. Customs and traditions change as people change and some should go through a renewal process after a time period.
That's what the courts are for.
Nonsense.Perhaps some amendments should come with an expiration date. Customs and traditions change as people change and some should go through a renewal process after a time period.
That's what the courts are for.
How many amendments have the court's declared expired because their time has run out?Nonsense.Perhaps some amendments should come with an expiration date. Customs and traditions change as people change and some should go through a renewal process after a time period.
That's what the courts are for.
The Constitution has a provision for this - see Article VPerhaps some amendments should come with an expiration date. Customs and traditions change as people change and some should go through a renewal process after a time period.
Can the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendment ever be changed without creating a new government?
I think most Americans affirm the first amendment in its present form. I just think there are more Americans that disagree with the 2nd, 4th and 5th. Those are the ones that need to be rewritten to match the modern United States of America.
Please cite the law that makes nuclear arms illegal in regards to citizenship ownership.It is Illegal for a citizen to own a nuke and it is perfectly legal to enforce that law Strategic weapons are not personal weapons.In the Constitution it is illegal for a State to own an armed Naval vessel which in 1789 was the only strategic weapon we had. So no stretch to include individuals in that ban. Be specific and list for us ANY Judge that disagrees? As for road blocks they also are perfectly legal nd YES cops can ask for and recieve ID if you don't provide it they can hold you till they establish your identity also perfectly legal.Can the 2nd, 4th and 5th amendment ever be changed without creating a new government?
The 2nd Amendment allows citizens to own nuclear bombs.
The 4th Amendment prohibits road blocks designed to catch drunk drivers.
The 5th Amendment allows people to ignore questions from cops.
Americans aren't the same in 2019 as they were in 1789. There were no nuclear bombs to consider. There were no intoxicated persons driving 2000 lb. hunks of metal at 60mph. There were no police officers. (Maybe a sheriff or two but not a police force like we know today) I think all Americans agree that you shouldn't own nuclear weapons, cops should capture drunk drivers and people should answer cops questions. However, aren't the Bill of Rights written in stone so to speak? They can't ever be removed? or can they? Most Americans in 2019 disagree with the objective if the 2nd, 4th and 5th Amendment.
I call Shenanigans.
Please provide a link to anyone other than a fringe kook who thinks individuals should have nuclear bombs.
It was our fringe kook forefathers who thought the people should be militarily capable of defeating the government if it ever stopped too far out of bounds. We as Americans don't believe that any more.
Second Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.