Biden proposes banning vast majority of all guns.

[Jaxson]

That's all it is.

A nuke isn't an "arm", and also isn't something as common as a semi-automatic weapon is.

So all you are doing is argumentum ad absurdum, and not realizing it, either by choice or by stupidity.

All you SJW twats have is pathetic attempted "gotcha" moments, not one of you can actually debate competently.

So you're basing your definition of arms by how common it is. Talk about a fallacious argument! lol

 

[Jaxson]

You are an idiot. Prisons have security to KEEP PEOPLE IN, schools need security TO KEEP PEOPLE OUT. No one that isn't a student, staff member or teacher should be on a campus period.

Why don't we just rename all the schools as NRA conventions, then nobody will get in with a gun because they admit that it's too dangerous to have them there. lol, bunch faggots, lol.

 

[Blues Man]

Ya, let's just sit on our hands and do nothing. Owning big ass guns is more important than child safety at school. GAWD! You're an idiot!

Taking a particular style of rifle away from people who will never kill anyone is going to stop school shootings how exactly?

A locked steel door will stop more school shootings than any gun ban

 

[Blues Man]

So like a prison, that's how our children should go to school? GAWD, YOU'RE AN IDIOT!

When you lock your doors at home do you feel like you are in prison?

 

[martybegan]

So you're basing your definition of arms by how common it is. Talk about a fallacious argument! lol

I'm basing it on what most normal people consider an "arm"

An F-15 isn't an arm.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I'm basing it on what most normal people consider an "arm"

Heller:
The Second Amendment extends, prima facie,to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.
United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes

And thus, "bearable arms" = "those in common use for lawful purposes".

"Common use", as shown in Caetano v Massachusetts has a very low bar, and as Heller turned on the fact handguns are class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense, the simple CHOICE of the weapon for a lawful purpose qualifies toward "in common use".

There you go.

 

[Concerned American]

That's all it is.

A nuke isn't an "arm", and also isn't something as common as a semi-automatic weapon is.

So all you are doing is argumentum ad absurdum, and not realizing it, either by choice or by stupidity.

All you SJW twats have is pathetic attempted "gotcha" moments, not one of you can actually debate competently.

While I agree with everything else in your post, I have to point out that nukes are indeed "arms" and they have been referred to as such for many years. Case in point--Reagan's SALT negotiations with Russia in the 80s. SALT was an acronym for Strategic ARMS Limitation Talks.

 

[M14 Shooter]

While I agree with everything else in your post, I have to point out that nukes are indeed "arms"

But not as the term is used in the 2nd Amendment.

 

[Pete7469]

I propose we ignore the jabbering retarded potato.

 

[Jaxson]

Taking a particular style of rifle away from people who will never kill anyone is going to stop school shootings how exactly?

A locked steel door will stop more school shootings than any gun ban

 

[Jaxson]

I'm basing it on what most normal people consider an "arm"

An F-15 isn't an arm.

A nuke is.

 

[martybegan]

While I agree with everything else in your post, I have to point out that nukes are indeed "arms" and they have been referred to as such for many years. Case in point--Reagan's SALT negotiations with Russia in the 80s. SALT was an acronym for Strategic ARMS Limitation Talks.

They aren't "arms" as considered in the Constitution at the time, which was clearly meant to say sidearms, or personal arms.

 

[martybegan]

A nuke is.

Not in the context of the 2nd amendment.

You are outweighed in this, oxygen thief, I suggest the Hello Kitty Message Board as being more up to your intellectual "abilities"

 

[M14 Shooter]

Not in the context of the 2nd amendment.

You are outweighed in this, oxygen thief, I suggest the Hello Kitty Message Board as being more up to your intellectual "abilities"

Hey!
There's no need to slander Hello Kitty like that.

 

[Jaxson]

Not in the context of the 2nd amendment.

You are outweighed in this, oxygen thief, I suggest the Hello Kitty Message Board as being more up to your intellectual "abilities"

So now you're infringing my rights by "context". Is that your final answer? lol

 

[Jaxson]

But not as the term is used in the 2nd Amendment.

You're arguing to restrict rights. You get that, right?

 

[2aguy]

So we should not care about 17-18 year old kids being killed and should not care about suicides?

Nope....what you did was attempt at distracting from the truth.

When idiots like you say child in relation to gun deaths, you are lying to uninformed readers by implying those children are actual children.......the truth is, the vast majority of deaths by guns that you call "children," are 15-19 year old gang members engaged in drug trafficking, and killing rivals.......big fucking difference........and that is why you lie. You need to lie to uninformed people because if they knew that the majority of so called "children" were actually 18 year olds car jacking, selling drugs and shooting at each other, you couldn't stampede these uninformed people into giving you the gun bans and confiscation that you want.....

So you lie....you guys lie about every aspect of guns in the U.S....

 

[2aguy]

Taking a particular style of rifle away from people who will never kill anyone is going to stop school shootings how exactly?

A locked steel door will stop more school shootings than any gun ban

Getting rid of the "Gun Free Zone," signs would do most of that work too.....

 

[Jaxson]

When you lock your doors at home do you feel like you are in prison?

The only time I lock my doors in when I'm going somewhere.

 

[Jaxson]

Nope....what you did was attempt at distracting from the truth.

When idiots like you say child in relation to gun deaths, you are lying to uninformed readers by implying those children are actual children.......the truth is, the vast majority of deaths by guns that you call "children," are 15-19 year old gang members engaged in drug trafficking, and killing rivals.......big fucking difference........and that is why you lie. You need to lie to uninformed people because if they knew that the majority of so called "children" were actually 18 year olds car jacking, selling drugs and shooting at each other, you couldn't stampede these uninformed people into giving you the gun bans and confiscation that you want.....

So you lie....you guys lie about every aspect of guns in the U.S....

So the school shootings don't exist for you? If it was JUST gang bangers, no one would give a fuck, but it's not, but you refuse to acknowledge that. Why is that?