What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Biden proposes banning vast majority of all guns.

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
46,861
Reaction score
41,109
Points
3,615

Vastator

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
18,917
Reaction score
6,115
Points
360
Taking his cue from Treudau. Or however the fuck you spell the guys name. Frankly; I think a move like this might be just the ticket to get asses out of seats; rather than the incrementalism that has self-professed 2A supporters clamoring over one another in a bid to prove who is more compliant with restrictions…
 

22lcidw

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2018
Messages
34,697
Reaction score
15,217
Points
1,585
They may vote this before leaving power. We are a democracy gosh darn it.
 

Damaged Eagle

Behind blue eyes
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
20,843
Reaction score
31,084
Points
2,445
Location
I have hours, only lonely
1669391271532.png


Then they should use their progressive logic and ban them from being purchased and utilized in civil law enforcement, secret service, security agencies, and the military.

Set an example for us simple souls.

*****CHUCKLE*****


:)
 

Muhammed

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
29,636
Reaction score
15,785
Points
1,415
Location
North Coast, USA
"Shoot them in the leg" Pedo Quid Pro Demento Joe has no clue what he's even talking about.
 

task0778

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
11,211
Reaction score
10,175
Points
2,265
Location
Texas hill country
This right here is why you do not want to get rid of the filibuster, cuz then it only takes 50 votes +1(Kamala) to do whatever the hell they want to in the Senate. Make no mistake, if they could push this through the Senate and the House right now it could be the law before New Year's. I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court would uh, shoot it down, but what if one day the democrats regain the House and keep the Senate and the White House AND finally abolish the filibuster. The next order of business for them would be to pack the Court and then we're fucked. Once that happens, it cannot be undone; we would forevermore be a one-party gov't, cuz the next thing they would do is federalize all elections to allow total and full mail-in votes with no voter-id, and that's it, we're done. Think it can't happen?
 

Vastator

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
18,917
Reaction score
6,115
Points
360
This right here is why you do not want to get rid of the filibuster, cuz then it only takes 50 votes +1(Kamala) to do whatever the hell they want to in the Senate. Make no mistake, if they could push this through the Senate and the House right now it could be the law before New Year's. I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court would uh, shoot it down, but what if one day the democrats regain the House and keep the Senate and the White House AND finally abolish the filibuster. The next order of business for them would be to pack the Court and then we're fucked. Once that happens, it cannot be undone; we would forevermore be a one-party gov't, cuz the next thing they would do is federalize all elections to allow total and full mail-in votes with no voter-id, and that's it, we're done. Think it can't happen?
We’re already “done”. Most folks just can’t accept it.
 

pknopp

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
55,360
Reaction score
19,328
Points
2,210
This right here is why you do not want to get rid of the filibuster, cuz then it only takes 50 votes +1(Kamala) to do whatever the hell they want to in the Senate. Make no mistake, if they could push this through the Senate and the House right now it could be the law before New Year's. I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court would uh, shoot it down, but what if one day the democrats regain the House and keep the Senate and the White House AND finally abolish the filibuster. The next order of business for them would be to pack the Court and then we're fucked. Once that happens, it cannot be undone; we would forevermore be a one-party gov't, cuz the next thing they would do is federalize all elections to allow total and full mail-in votes with no voter-id, and that's it, we're done. Think it can't happen?

They could pass it and it still wouldn't happen.
 

Flash

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
57,963
Reaction score
46,155
Points
3,645
Location
Florida
Tell us again how he isn’t coming after America’s guns. He wants to ban all semi-automatic weapons.


The sonofabitch stole an election, destroyed energy independence, allowed millions of Illegals to flood in, decreased family income and caused massive inflation and then he calls somebody that buys a Ruger 10-22 "sick"? LOL! The idiots that voted for him are the sickos.
 

Winston

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
5,435
Reaction score
2,751
Points
940
Location
North Carolina
View attachment 730782

Then they should use their progressive logic and ban them from being purchased and utilized in civil law enforcement, secret service, security agencies, and the military.

Set an example for us simple souls.

*****CHUCKLE*****


:)
Yes, they should not ban the private ownership of semi-automatic weapons, they should ban the manufacturing of them, except for military uses. Law enforcement can use single action pistols, bolt action rifles, and double barreled shotguns. I mean all you semi-automatic nuts must be some piss poor shots. You can't participate in cowboy shooting competitions, and while I might concede the advantage of having a semi-auto shotgun while dove hunting, no one should be hunting doves to start with.

To be honest, those that yield a semi-auto have adopted the spray and pray strategy, like during the Iraq War. 250,000 rounds fired for every insurgent killed. You guys are an insult to the skill of marksmanship. Daniel Morgan is rolling in his grave.
 

Vastator

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
18,917
Reaction score
6,115
Points
360
Yes, they should not ban the private ownership of semi-automatic weapons, they should ban the manufacturing of them, except for military uses. Law enforcement can use single action pistols, bolt action rifles, and double barreled shotguns. I mean all you semi-automatic nuts must be some piss poor shots. You can't participate in cowboy shooting competitions, and while I might concede the advantage of having a semi-auto shotgun while dove hunting, no one should be hunting doves to start with.

To be honest, those that yield a semi-auto have adopted the spray and pray strategy, like during the Iraq War. 250,000 rounds fired for every insurgent killed. You guys are an insult to the skill of marksmanship. Daniel Morgan is rolling in his grave.
The 2A has nothing to do with sport, or hunting Princess…
 

Polishprince

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
39,912
Reaction score
27,581
Points
1,915
They might and it has a zero chance of passing.

Actually, it would stand a real good chance of passing.

And if it doesn't, Sleepy Joe might just sign an executive order, and there aren't enough Republican votes to override it.
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

Forum List

Top