Biden DOJ admits they haven't prosecuted a single person for illegally protesting outside SCOTUS justices' homes

[marvin martian]

There's a very clearly worded law (18 U.S. Code § 1507) that prohibits these protests, and Joe Biden's administration has effectively told terrorists like the one who tried to murder Brett Kavanaugh that they are free to break that law without repercussions.

 

[HenryBHough]

Aren't ALL registered Democrats free to break any laws without consequence?

At least until January.

 

[Marener]

Man. The first amendment is a real bitch.

 

[easyt65]

So the US AG & DOJ just confessed to refusing to enforce US laws to protect liberal criminal, violent, domestic terrorists....

At least they are being forthcoming / honest about it.

 

[marvin martian]

Man. The first amendment is a real bitch.

No it's not. But there's a law specific to what these terrorists did, and Biden won't punish them for it, because he told them to do it.

 

[Nostra]

Too busy chasing Soccor Moms, er domestic terrorists.

 

[Nostra]

Man. The first amendment is a real bitch.

What a stupid post.

 

[Ralph Norton]

Man. The first amendment is a real bitch.

Which part of 'illegally protesting' are you struggling with?

 

[Marener]

Which part of 'illegally protesting' are you struggling with?

The part where the first amendment says the government can’t infringe on your free speech or the right to peacefully assemble.

 

[Auld Phart]

Man. The first amendment is a real bitch.

Yea

it makes it illegal to yell fire in a theater, use hate speech, and doesn't protect you when you threaten SCOTUS Justices.

 

[Faun]

Aren't ALL registered Democrats free to break any laws without consequence?

At least until January.

Oh? What happens in January that would have altered that even had it been true?

 

[Marener]

Yea

it makes it illegal to yell fire in a theater, use hate speech, and doesn't protect you when you threaten SCOTUS Justices.

Hate speech is protected. Threatening justices isn’t.

Is peacefully protesting on a sidewalk protected by the first amendment? I think it is.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Pathetic NASTY Liberals. I hope someone goes in front of their house, 24 hours a day and disrupts their lowly disgusting Liberal lives....

 

[Faun]

Yea

it makes it illegal to yell fire in a theater, use hate speech, and doesn't protect you when you threaten SCOTUS Justices.

A shame you don't even know it's not illegal to yell fire in a theater.

 

[JoeB131]

There's a very clearly worded law (18 U.S. Code § 1507) that prohibits these protests, and Joe Biden's administration has effectively told terrorists like the one who tried to murder Brett Kavanaugh that they are free to break that law without repercussions.

Why should they? No point in arresting someone if you can't get a conviction...

 

[Ralph Norton]

The part where the first amendment says the government can’t infringe on your free speech or the right to peacefully assemble.

"Restrictions on the First Amendment must satisfy a three-prong test outlined by the Supreme Court in Ward v. Rock Against Racism (1989). These are also known as "time, place and manner restrictions."

So cry me a fucking river.

 

[WEATHER53]

Yeah but they are all over the yellers and pushers from1/6.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hate speech is protected. Threatening justices isn’t.

Is peacefully protesting on a sidewalk protected by the first amendment? I think it is.

Is peacefully protesting on a sidewalk protected by the first amendment?

NOT WHEN I'T AGAINST THE LAW.

 

[Auld Phart]

Why should they? No point in arresting someone if you can't get a conviction...

No point in arresting someone if you can't get a conviction...

and why would they NOT get a conviction?

 

[Zincwarrior]

NOT WHEN I'T AGAINST THE LAW.

Bill of Rights trumps statutes.