Biden DOJ admits they haven't prosecuted a single person for illegally protesting outside SCOTUS justices' homes

[Marener]

He's not a SCOTUS justice, is he?

I guess that just means that we are all equals but some are more equal than others.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Arbitrary limitations of speech are clearly unconstitutional.

Let SCOTUS decide if you are right!

 

[Marener]

Let SCOTUS decide if you are right!

They’re the ones being arbitrarily protected.

That means there’s an inherent conflict of interest.

 

[Nostra]

Of course not. And that POS was rightfully arrested and charged.

Has nothing to do with the others who were peacefully protesting on a public sidewalk.

They were committing a crime, Simp.

Not sure why you think you can just dismiss that. The fact Gestapoland ignored it for day is why this nutbag showed up to assassinate Kavanagh.

 

[Nostra]

I’m a fan of freedom. Something the jackbooted authoritarians in Texas don’t respect.

Link us up to the last time someone was arrested in Texas for sodomy, Simp.

GO Marener

 

[AZrailwhale]

They should only revisit cases that were clearly wrongly decided, like Plessy. Where the constitution was deliberately ignored.

There was no good reason to revisit Roe. Expecially after Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrett all said it was the law of the land.

Clearly wrongly decided according to whom?

 

[Circe]

SCOTUS said it was unconstitutional to prevent them from doing so.

Reap what you sew.

What I SEW?? Does knitting count?