THE LAW says that you cannot protest in front of a judge's home, so why is the law being ignored? (Poll)

[kyzr]

This is another case of the DOJ's "double standard' regarding enforcement of US Law. Remember this when the tables are turned.

MSN

Pro-choice activists marched in front of the home of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh Wednesday evening just hours after a man was charged with threatening to kill him.

Should the public be allowed to protest outside of Supreme Court Justices’s homes?

Protests in "public forums" directed at the judiciary can be complicated by federal laws. Northeastern University experts break it down.

news.northeastern.edu

But protests directed at members of the judiciary are subject to another layer of federal oversight. A federal statute prohibits “picketing or parading” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.” Violation of this law can lead to a fine or imprisonment for less than a year, or both. The Department of Justice has been mute on the question of whether the protests outside of the Montgomery County homes of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. and Kavanaugh amount to “obstruction of justice,” according to the New York Post.

FREE SPEECH CAN BE EXERCISED IN FRONT OF THE USSC, behind the fence.

 

[ozro]

If proud boys were protesting at that "wise Latina's" house, do you think they would be allowed to continue?

 

[HandleTheTruth]

The law should be upheld. No excuses.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If only the mob used enemy democrat tactics to give orders to the judge.

 

[Dekster]

He should appeal it to the SCOTUS and see what they think.

 

[Death-Ninja]

There are multiple violations of existing law, its a misdemeanor to protest at any judge, or jury members home, however it is a felony to do so with the obvious intention of threatening them, or menacing them into altering a decision, or changing a vote! So, Garland is actively aiding & abetting in the commission of hundreds of felony crimes, which of course makes him a felon!

 

[kyzr]

Another Article of Impeachment for Biden and Garland.

 

[Billy_Bob]

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading
​

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.


Garland is violating federal law.. Biden thinks violating federal law is ok too... Both need to be in prison for aiding and abetting criminal acts with the intent to influence/intimidate a judge...

 

[kyzr]

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading​

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.

Garland is violating federal law.. Biden thinks violating federal law is ok too... Both need to be in prison for aiding and abetting criminal acts with the intent to influence/intimidate a judge...

Exactly. A clear violation of LAW.

 

[strollingbones]

The law should be upheld. No excuses.

Does that include trump

 

[alang1216]

Does that include trump

I don't think any Federal or VA prosecutors want to test the law in this case. I believe all the protests were peaceful and the law may conflict with the 1st Amendment.

 

[Votto]

The law should be upheld. No excuses.

The only way to get the law enforced are for people to protest in front of Justice Brown's home.

 

[Billy_Bob]

I don't think any Federal or VA prosecutors want to test the law in this case. I believe all the protests were peaceful and the law may conflict with the 1st Amendment.

Yep an assassination attempt is peaceful... do you even listen to the bullshit you say?

As the judiciary is a CO EQUAL branch of the government, protesting in front of their homes is intimidation and a crime. it will pass constitutional muster as the courts are to be impartial arbiters of the law and any intimidation tactic used is a threat to that impartiality.

You don't have a clue.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes, they should be arrested if it can be shown that their intent is the influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.

 

[alang1216]

Yep an assassination attempt is peaceful... do you even listen to the bullshit you say?

There are already laws against assassinations. Do you really think an assassin will be deterred by a law against protesting?

As the judiciary is a CO EQUAL branch of the government, protesting in front of their homes is intimidation and a crime. it will pass constitutional muster as the courts are to be impartial arbiters of the law and any intimidation tactic used is a threat to that impartiality.

So sending a group of protesters to the Capitol Building to intimidate or influence the legislative branch of the gov't should also be a crime?

 

[WEATHER53]

Because liberals feel it is their first prerogative to express their feelings and law is second or third.

 

[WEATHER53]

There are already laws against assassinations. Do you really think an assassin will be deterred by a law against protesting?


So sending a group of protesters to the Capitol Building to intimidate or influence the legislative branch of the gov't should also be a crime?

We have said the Capitol building is The Place for permitted protest.
You out of control law evading liberals arent satisfied with that and want to act like babies in front of peoples homes.

 

[alang1216]

We have said the Capito building is The Place for permitted protest.
You out of control law evading liberals arent satisfied with that and want to act like babies in front of peoples homes.

Who's 'We'? Do you have a mouse in your pocket or are you channeling the 1st Amendment?

 

[Billy_Bob]

There are already laws against assassinations. Do you really think an assassin will be deterred by a law against protesting?


So sending a group of protesters to the Capitol Building to intimidate or influence the legislative branch of the gov't should also be a crime?

Redress of grievances lies with the people and their elected representatives.

Judges have the job of interpreting the law.

Two very different functions. one is protected speech the other is not.

 

[WEATHER53]

Who's 'We'? Do you have a mouse in your pocket or are you channeling the 1st Amendment?

Always oblique once defeated
We is the approx 50% of Americans who are governed by law and order rather than feelings and illegality
Clear now are ye?