Blowing Up Darwin

[scruffy]

So Darwin's theory and that of creationists are on the same level?

No.

There is plenty of of evidence for evolution.

Not even a shred for creation. Not even a single piece.

Throwing in the towel, huh?

Towel? What towel? We're not fighting.

 

[Hollie]

I for one don't have the mental capacity to understand evolution, therefore I would have to treat it like a religion and accept it on faith.

No need for faith. The Theory of Evolution is among the best supported scientific theories.

Biological evolution defines a change in the genetic characteristics of populations over time. That has been confirmed by various science disciplines to include paleontology, anthropology, geology, oceanography, physics, archaeology, and other branches of science that conflict with the religious extremist ideas of the science-loathing types we see in this thread.

 

[Hollie]

As recent developments have proven that the Democrats/Left has no compunction as far as lies, hoaxes and slander, it is time to highlight their similar attempts at the basis of Western Civilization….religion.
And the use of Darwin’s theory to attack same.

In this thread, an interview that Piers Morgan had with Dr. Stephen Meyer, about the actual science behind Charles Darwin’s theory (spoiler: there is none)​

When it comes to evolution, politics is more prominent than science. And with that in mind, .....a simple rule that will clarify the place Darwin’s Theory holds:
Any article, event, opinion, data or study that redounds in favor of the Left/Demorat Party, is to be considered a lie or hoax.

• One of the first readers of 'On the Origin of Species' was Friedrich Engels, then living in Manchester. He wrote to Karl Marx: "Darwin, by the way, whom I’m reading just now, is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that had yet to be demolished, and that has now been done. Never before has so grandiose an attempt been made to demonstrate historical evolution in Nature, and certainly never to such good effect."
  Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, "Marx-Engels Collected Works" , vol. 40, p. 441.

• I will provide the interview of Meyer by Piers Morgan…..and quotes from that interview. Meyer provides FACTS. Put aside the Democrat/Liberal/Marxist anti-religion propaganda, and focus on the science that demolishes Darwin’s Theory.
• 
  
• 
  

• 
  
• Tucker Carlson, on Joe Rogan: “Evolution as articulated by Darwin is kinda not true. There is no evidence for it….if all life originated from a single organism, there would be a fossil record of that….and there is not.”
• 
  
• Meyer: “Here in London, 2016, there was a conference held by the most august scientific society, the Royal Society, a group of evolutionary biologists, are dissatisfied with Darwin’s method of evolutionary change, natural selection and random mutation …lacks the creative power to generate major changes in life.”

Meyer is a hack and a Charlatan. No reason why anyone but religious extremists would consider a Disco'tute groupie and non- scientist an authority on anything.

 

[scruffy]

No need for faith. The Theory of Evolution is among the best supported scientific theories.

Biological evolution defines a change in the genetic characteristics of populations over time. That has been confirmed by various science disciplines to include paleontology, anthropology, geology, oceanography, physics, archaeology, and other branches of science that conflict with the religious extremist ideas of the science-loathing types we see in this thread.

The OP is misguided. She's blaming science for the abuse by leftards.

When the truth is, leftards will abuse anything they can get their hands on. Science and 150 other things. Even the kitchen sink.

 

[Leo123]

More creationist bullshit?

I answered your question 5 times already

Go back and read the thread.

Damn you people are annoying. Y'all are exactly like the idiot leftists the OP is complaining about.

You never answered my question. All you do is spam the thread avoiding it. Not even Darwin said his theory explained the origin of life. You give examples of living organisms only which anyone can cut and paste. You look for reasons to deny intelligent design but have no proof. Examples of the workings of biological processes does not support your position because you fail to research why.

 

[Leo123]

Meyer is a hack and a Charlatan. No reason why anyone but religious extremists would consider a Disco'tute groupie and non- scientist an authority on anything.

Yeah, we know, anyone who disagrees with you is a hack.

 

[Hollie]

Yeah, we know, anyone who disagrees with you is a hack.

I hurt your tender sensibilities.

Meyer has no training in any of the biological or physical Sciences. He has a degree in philosophy. Otherwise. Do your homework and understand what the Disco'tute is all about. Let us know what experimentation they have done and what research papers they have submitted for peer review.

You might want to Email Meyer and have the frauds of ID'iot creationism submit their "General Theory of supernatural Creation".

Tell us about the magic used by the gods to magically poof into existence all of the earth, planets and present/ past biological life.

 

[scruffy]

You never answered my question.

Five times already.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

Read the damn thread.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No.

There is plenty of of evidence for evolution.

Not even a shred for creation. Not even a single piece.



Towel? What towel? We're not fighting.

"There is plenty of of evidence for evolution."
That's Darwinism under discussion.

And no there isn't.
Not any more than for any other conjecture.


"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski



"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.





Time for you to face the fact that Darwin's thesis is a political affectation.

Admit it.....you'll feel better.

 

[Leo123]

Five times already.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

Read the damn thread.

Hard to tell with your pages and pages of irrelevant spam.

 

[Leo123]

I hurt your tender sensibilities.

Meyer has no training in any of the biological or physical Sciences. He has a degree in philosophy. Otherwise. Do your homework and understand what the Disco'tute is all about. Let us know what experimentation they have done and what research papers they have submitted for peer review.

You might want to Email Meyer and have the frauds of ID'iot creationism submit their "General Theory of supernatural Creation".

Tell us about the magic used by the gods to magically poof into existence all of the earth, planets and present/ past biological life.

We are not discussing biology, my question deals with how the first life came to be. It must have been intelligent design, IMO.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Show me evidence! Explain it!"

scruffy posts mountains of both

"Stop spamming the thread with stuff I don't understand!"

 

[scruffy]

"There is plenty of of evidence for evolution."
That's Darwinism under discussion.

And no there isn't.
Not any more than for any other conjecture.
.

Horseshit

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We are not discussing biology, my question deals with how the first life came to be. It must have been intelligent design, IMO.

Because you're employing god of the gaps.

When you didn't understand evolution, you credited the gods for evolution.

Your god seems to become smaller, as the area of your ignorance becomes smaller.

 

[Hollie]

We are not discussing biology, my question deals with how the first life came to be. It must have been intelligent design, IMO.

"It must have been ID. Because I say so".

There is nothing in the biological Sciences that would prevent the first spark of life. In fact, that's the only mechanism we have available to understand the process.

"Magic by the gods" tells us nothing.

 

[scruffy]

"It must have been ID. Because I say so".

There is nothing in the biological Sciences that would prevent the first spark of life. In fact, that's the only mechanism we have available to understand the process.

"Magic by the gods" tells us nothing.

It's sad to see the creationists get so dumbed down.

They've turned into ideologues.

Which is exactly what the OP is complaining about.

Instead of stepping up to the plate they choose to bury their heads in the sand.

 

[Leo123]

"It must have been ID. Because I say so".

There is nothing in the biological Sciences that would prevent the first spark of life. In fact, that's the only mechanism we have available to understand the process.

"Magic by the gods" tells us nothing.

Again, we’re not discussing already created biological organisms or living cells.

 

[Leo123]

It's sad to see the creationists get so dumbed down.

They've turned into ideologues.

Which is exactly what the OP is complaining about.

Instead of stepping up to the plate they choose to bury their heads in the sand.

There seem to be two subjects here, The evolution of biological entities and my subject how the first living cell was created. You’re conflating it all together and dissing anyone who disagrees with you as some kind of an idiot..

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There seem to be two subjects here, The evolution of biological entities and my subject how the first living cell was created. You’re conflating it all together and dissing anyone who disagrees with you as some kind of an idiot..

Have you ever ONCE considered reading up on the current science of the subject?

Even ONCE?

 

[scruffy]

Again, we’re not discussing already created biological organisms or living cells.

Yes, we are.

That's what evolution is, doofus.

That is in fact the Darwinian theory in the OP's subject.