While Biden DOJ Refuses To Enforce Federal Law In Prorection Of USSC Justices, FBI Confirmed Targeting Parents Under Counter-Terrorism Provisions

[easyt65]

Biden seems to be suffering from failed Enemy Threat Recognition.

He is protecting Domestic Terrorists while the corrupt, treasonous rogue FBI, now under leadership of the latest criminal director, Wray, is going after Parents the Biden ad.inistrarion has labeled as 'terrorists'.

Biden DOJ Fails to Enforce Federal Law Against Protesting Outside the Homes of SCOTUS Justices

redstate.com

Whistleblower Confirms: FBI Targeting Parents Under Counter-Terrorism Provisions

redstate.com

 

[Sunsettommy]

Biden is showing his ugly priorities that only harms the nation.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The FBI is a political group used by the cult to intimidate anyone who opposes them.

 

[easyt65]

The FBI is a political group used by the cult to intimidate anyone who opposes them.

Intimidate, jail....

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Biden seems to be suffering from failed Enemy Threat Recognition.

He is protecting Domestic Terrorists while the corrupt, treasonous rogue FBI, now under leadership of the latest criminal director, Wray, is going after Parents the Biden ad.inistrarion has labeled as 'terrorists'.

Biden DOJ Fails to Enforce Federal Law Against Protesting Outside the Homes of SCOTUS Justices

redstate.com

Whistleblower Confirms: FBI Targeting Parents Under Counter-Terrorism Provisions

redstate.com

What are the SCOTUS protesters doing that is illegal, EXACTLY? Ever hear of the 1st Amendment?

 

[easyt65]

What are the SCOTUS protesters doing that is illegal, EXACTLY? Ever hear of the 1st Amendment?

It is illegal to protest outside of USSC Justice's homes with the intention of intimidating or pressuring Justices into changing their decisions. This is considered attempting to obstruct justice.

You have obviously never heard of this, making you ignorant.

Even worse, you could have looked this up yourself, educated yourself, rather than self-idrntify as IGNORANT...

...which.means not only are you ignorant but LAZY as well.

 

[1srelluc]

What are the SCOTUS protesters doing that is illegal, EXACTLY? Ever hear of the 1st Amendment?

It's against Virginia law for starters.

§ 18.2-419. Picketing or disrupting tranquility of home.​

Any person who shall engage in picketing before or about the residence or dwelling place of any individual, or who shall assemble with another person or persons in a manner which disrupts or threatens to disrupt any individual's right to tranquility in his home, shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. Each day on which a violation of this section occurs shall constitute a separate offense.

Nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit (1) the picketing in any lawful manner, during a labor dispute, of the place of employment involved in such labor dispute; (2) the picketing in any lawful manner of a construction site; or (3) the holding of a meeting or assembly on any premises commonly used for the discussion of subjects of general public interest.

Notwithstanding the penalties herein provided, any court of general equity jurisdiction may enjoin conduct, or threatened conduct, proscribed by this article, and may in any such proceeding award damages, including punitive damages, against the persons found guilty of actions made unlawful by this section.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Any person who shall engage in picketing before or about the residence or dwelling place of any individual, or who shall assemble with another person or persons in a manner which disrupts or threatens to disrupt any individual's right to tranquility in his home, shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. Each day on which a violation of this section occurs shall constitute a separate offense.

From your post: "In a manner which disrupts or threatens to disrupt any individual's right to tranquility in his home" So, what did they do that rises to that level?

 

[kyzr]

What are the SCOTUS protesters doing that is illegal, EXACTLY? Ever hear of the 1st Amendment?

There are laws that prohibit intimidating judges. You can protest, just not at their residences.

 

[Ralph Norton]

From your post: "In a manner which disrupts or threatens to disrupt any individual's right to tranquility in his home" So, what did they do that rises to that level?

Try this then:
Federal law prohibits “pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” when it is “with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer.”

 

[Papageorgio]

What are the SCOTUS protesters doing that is illegal, EXACTLY? Ever hear of the 1st Amendment?

Protesting with the intent to persuade or intimidate a judge is illegal. No other reason for anyone to go to their homes, they can protest in front of the Supreme Court's building.

 

[1srelluc]

From your post: "In a manner which disrupts or threatens to disrupt any individual's right to tranquility in his home" So, what did they do that rises to that level?

All they have to do is file a complaint then it's up to the cops but as far as I know they have not done so as of yet.

If they are blocking the street the cops can also give them the bum's rush for that but it's in liberal Fairfax County I suspect the FCPD has been told not to.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

There are laws that prohibit intimidating judges. You can protest, just not at their residences.

Well, if they are intimidated by people walking by in Handmaiden costumes carrying signs, they are just pathetic snow flakes.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

All they have to do is file a complaint then it's up to the cops but as far as I know they have not done so as of yet.

If they are blocking the street the cops can also give them the bum's rush for that but it's in liberal Fairfax County I suspect the FCPD has been told not to.

Are they blocking the street ? So far, I have not heard anything that they did that rises to the level of a crime

 

[1srelluc]

Well, if they are intimidated by people walking by in Handmaiden costumes carrying signs, they are just pathetic snow flakes.

Have you seen some of those ugly bitches? I'm pretty sure they would scare small children.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Protesting with the intent to persuade or intimidate a judge is illegal. No other reason for anyone to go to their homes, they can protest in front of the Supreme Court's building.

Persuade? I do not think the law says that. Intimidate.? How.? They have not made any threats that I know of

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

What are the SCOTUS protesters doing that is illegal, EXACTLY? Ever hear of the 1st Amendment?

Time, place, and manner. Federal law prohibits protesting at the homes of Justices. Merrick Garland has done nothing about it because he approves of the behavior.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Have you seen some of those ugly bitches? I'm pretty sure they would scare small children.

Now you are sinking to a new low!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Time, place, and manner. Federal law prohibits protesting at the homes of Justices. Merrick Garland has done nothing about it because he approves of the behavior.

Link please.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading

www.law.cornell.edu