"Bible Thumpers" - Darwinists

[Hollie]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.

You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.

Not sure where you got that nonsense from but it’s simply not true.

 

[Blues Man]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

You are using the term bible thumper incorrectly

Definition of BIBLE-THUMPER

an aggressively zealous advocate of Christian fundamentalism… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

an aggressively zealous advocate of Christian fundamentalism

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.

You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.

So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.

Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
Now address those designed reversals...

Every living being is built on previous beings. Their designs are changed to create a new species. Organ reversals are just the roadmap to previous species and exactly what you'd expect to see as a result of evolution.

I answered you so please answer me. Why would an intelligent being purposely design a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals?

Organ reversals are just the roadmap

And who drew that roadmap?

Nature drew the map and science read it.

Where did nature come from?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No
It's up to US guys to provide evidence: Overwhelming EVIDENCE.
160 Years of Uncontradicted evidence that many new sciences have only helped confirm.
So science HAS done so.
Religions/gods have shown NONE that their/any god exists.
10,000 religions/gods, 10,000 Years. NOTHING.

`

Is that the same science that says, men with tits are women? Or there are now 75 genders when there are really only two?

Are there any other human traits that only have two expressions? Are there only two heights, IQs, races, etc. Every aspect is a continuous spectrum, why expect gender to be any different?

Since time started if you had XY chromosomes you are a male, if you have XX chromosomes you are female, that has been science long before i have been around. Now are you telling the rest of US that science isnt truthful?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

You are using the term bible thumper incorrectly

Definition of BIBLE-THUMPER

an aggressively zealous advocate of Christian fundamentalism… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

an aggressively zealous advocate of Christian fundamentalism

Seems a little bigoted there....

 

[alang1216]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.

You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.

So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.

Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
Now address those designed reversals...

Every living being is built on previous beings. Their designs are changed to create a new species. Organ reversals are just the roadmap to previous species and exactly what you'd expect to see as a result of evolution.

I answered you so please answer me. Why would an intelligent being purposely design a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals?

Organ reversals are just the roadmap

And who drew that roadmap?

Nature drew the map and science read it.

Where did nature come from?

I have no idea since there is zero evidence for any scenario.

 

[Hollie]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.

You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.

So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.

Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
Now address those designed reversals...

Every living being is built on previous beings. Their designs are changed to create a new species. Organ reversals are just the roadmap to previous species and exactly what you'd expect to see as a result of evolution.

I answered you so please answer me. Why would an intelligent being purposely design a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals?

Organ reversals are just the roadmap

And who drew that roadmap?

Nature drew the map and science read it.

Where did nature come from?

Where did the gods come from?

 

[alang1216]

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No
It's up to US guys to provide evidence: Overwhelming EVIDENCE.
160 Years of Uncontradicted evidence that many new sciences have only helped confirm.
So science HAS done so.
Religions/gods have shown NONE that their/any god exists.
10,000 religions/gods, 10,000 Years. NOTHING.

`

Is that the same science that says, men with tits are women? Or there are now 75 genders when there are really only two?

Are there any other human traits that only have two expressions? Are there only two heights, IQs, races, etc. Every aspect is a continuous spectrum, why expect gender to be any different?

Since time started if you had XY chromosomes you are a male, if you have XX chromosomes you are female, that has been science long before i have been around. Now are you telling the rest of US that science isnt truthful?

It is your understanding of biology that is at fault as you are oversimplifying the science. So if XY is male and XX is female, what gender is XXY or XYY?

 

[beautress]

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No
It's up to US guys to provide evidence: Overwhelming EVIDENCE.
160 Years of Uncontradicted evidence that many new sciences have only helped confirm.
So science HAS done so.
Religions/gods have shown NONE that their/any god exists.
10,000 religions/gods, 10,000 Years. NOTHING.

`

Science grew out of Christian respect for the truth.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Science grew out of Christian respect for the truth.

The Ivy League Colleges of America all have Christian charters. No college on earth has an atheist charter.
The motto of Oxford University is "The Lord is our Light."

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

Long story short, the answer is a resounding "NO"!

 

[alang1216]

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No
It's up to US guys to provide evidence: Overwhelming EVIDENCE.
160 Years of Uncontradicted evidence that many new sciences have only helped confirm.
So science HAS done so.
Religions/gods have shown NONE that their/any god exists.
10,000 religions/gods, 10,000 Years. NOTHING.

`

Science grew out of Christian respect for the truth.

I'm not sure Galileo would agree. He might say Science grew in spite of Christianity.

 

[norwegen]

Evolution and the Bible are about as compatible as fish and bicycles.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No
It's up to US guys to provide evidence: Overwhelming EVIDENCE.
160 Years of Uncontradicted evidence that many new sciences have only helped confirm.
So science HAS done so.
Religions/gods have shown NONE that their/any god exists.
10,000 religions/gods, 10,000 Years. NOTHING.

`

Is that the same science that says, men with tits are women? Or there are now 75 genders when there are really only two?

Are there any other human traits that only have two expressions? Are there only two heights, IQs, races, etc. Every aspect is a continuous spectrum, why expect gender to be any different?

Since time started if you had XY chromosomes you are a male, if you have XX chromosomes you are female, that has been science long before i have been around. Now are you telling the rest of US that science isnt truthful?

It is your understanding of biology that is at fault as you are oversimplifying the science. So if XY is male and XX is female, what gender is XXY or XYY?

XXY is a liberal pussy man.
XYY is a radical butt ugly liberal woman.

Does that help?

XYY Man..................................................................XXY Butt ugly woman

 

[Indeependent]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.

You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.

So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.

Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
Now address those designed reversals...

Every living being is built on previous beings. Their designs are changed to create a new species. Organ reversals are just the roadmap to previous species and exactly what you'd expect to see as a result of evolution.

I answered you so please answer me. Why would an intelligent being purposely design a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals?

Organ reversals are just the roadmap

And who drew that roadmap?

Nature drew the map and science read it.

Where did nature come from?

Where did the gods come from?

Man deciding to worships the stars and objects by foolishly believing that God has no interest in the individual.
You obviously have not studied the subject and all you have is moronic remarks.

 

[Hollie]

Science grew out of Christian respect for the truth.

The Ivy League Colleges of America all have Christian charters. No college on earth has an atheist charter.
The motto of Oxford University is "The Lord is our Light."

Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

Long story short, the answer is a resounding "NO"!

A really nonsense claim. Atheism is not an ideology.

Please do examine claims of Atheists. Describe those claims.

 

[Hollie]

The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.

Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.

You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.

So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.

Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
Now address those designed reversals...

Every living being is built on previous beings. Their designs are changed to create a new species. Organ reversals are just the roadmap to previous species and exactly what you'd expect to see as a result of evolution.

I answered you so please answer me. Why would an intelligent being purposely design a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals?

Organ reversals are just the roadmap

And who drew that roadmap?

Nature drew the map and science read it.

Where did nature come from?

Where did the gods come from?

Man deciding to worships the stars and objects by foolishly believing that God has no interest in the individual.
You obviously have not studied the subject and all you have is moronic remarks.

So, you agree then that your “organ reversal” claim is nonsense.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I have found out that when you dont believe in intelligent design, then you have nothing to live for. No hope for reaching the end and finding out there is a better place, just that you are worm food or buzzard bait. But what about the soul? Even a die hard Democrat seems to find a way to pray for salvation when they are close to seeing the grim reaper.

Ted Kennedy’s Letter to the Pope: “I am writing with deep humility to ask that you pray for me as my own health declines.”

The Boston Herald has printed excerpts of a letter from Senator Edward Kennedy to Pope Benedict XVI in July, hand-delivered by President Barack Obama during his Papal visit last month.

www.mediaite.com

“I’ve always tried to be a faithful Catholic, Your Holiness, and though I have fallen short through human failings, I have never failed to believe and respect the fundamental teaching of my faith. I continue to pray for God’s blessing, on you, and on our church, and would be most thankful for your prayers for me.”

 

[Hollie]

I have found out that when you dont believe in intelligent design, then you have nothing to live for. No hope for reaching the end and finding out there is a better place, just that you are worm food or buzzard bait. But what about the soul? Even a die hard Democrat seems to find a way to pray for salvation when they are close to seeing the grim reaper.

Ted Kennedy’s Letter to the Pope: “I am writing with deep humility to ask that you pray for me as my own health declines.”

The Boston Herald has printed excerpts of a letter from Senator Edward Kennedy to Pope Benedict XVI in July, hand-delivered by President Barack Obama during his Papal visit last month.

www.mediaite.com

“I’ve always tried to be a faithful Catholic, Your Holiness, and though I have fallen short through human failings, I have never failed to believe and respect the fundamental teaching of my faith. I continue to pray for God’s blessing, on you, and on our church, and would be most thankful for your prayers for me.”

“I have found out that when you dont believe in intelligent design, then you have nothing to live for.”

Sounds like a pretty miserable existence.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I have found out that when you dont believe in intelligent design, then you have nothing to live for. No hope for reaching the end and finding out there is a better place, just that you are worm food or buzzard bait. But what about the soul? Even a die hard Democrat seems to find a way to pray for salvation when they are close to seeing the grim reaper.

Ted Kennedy’s Letter to the Pope: “I am writing with deep humility to ask that you pray for me as my own health declines.”

The Boston Herald has printed excerpts of a letter from Senator Edward Kennedy to Pope Benedict XVI in July, hand-delivered by President Barack Obama during his Papal visit last month.

www.mediaite.com

“I’ve always tried to be a faithful Catholic, Your Holiness, and though I have fallen short through human failings, I have never failed to believe and respect the fundamental teaching of my faith. I continue to pray for God’s blessing, on you, and on our church, and would be most thankful for your prayers for me.”

“I have found out that when you dont believe in intelligent design, then you have nothing to live for.”

Sounds like a pretty miserable existence.

Yes, why else are the Democraps so miserable?

 

[alang1216]

Nope!
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.

No
It's up to US guys to provide evidence: Overwhelming EVIDENCE.
160 Years of Uncontradicted evidence that many new sciences have only helped confirm.
So science HAS done so.
Religions/gods have shown NONE that their/any god exists.
10,000 religions/gods, 10,000 Years. NOTHING.

`

Is that the same science that says, men with tits are women? Or there are now 75 genders when there are really only two?

Are there any other human traits that only have two expressions? Are there only two heights, IQs, races, etc. Every aspect is a continuous spectrum, why expect gender to be any different?

Since time started if you had XY chromosomes you are a male, if you have XX chromosomes you are female, that has been science long before i have been around. Now are you telling the rest of US that science isnt truthful?

It is your understanding of biology that is at fault as you are oversimplifying the science. So if XY is male and XX is female, what gender is XXY or XYY?

XXY is a liberal pussy man.
XYY is a radical butt ugly liberal woman.

Does that help?

XYY Man..................................................................XXY Butt ugly woman
View attachment 397367 View attachment 397368

Help? No. Confirm? Yes.