What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Top 10 Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
In the 2030s when mankind finally lands on Mars they will discover remnants of primitive life that existed before Mars lost its atmosphere.
They will? Even if they do, that life still has to have a creator to get it all started. There is no evidence that non-life molecules or atoms can begin life on their own. I thought you atheist-scientists were all about empirical evidence? Guess not so you should allow believers to believe without slamming us for the belief in something not seen.
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
12,333
Reaction score
5,193
Points
938
They will? Even if they do, that life still has to have a creator to get it all started. There is no evidence that non-life molecules or atoms can begin life on their own. I thought you atheist-scientists were all about empirical evidence? Guess not so you should allow believers to believe without slamming us for the belief in something not seen.
Creative force or energy will have no relation to Earth's tribal religious gods.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
14,131
Reaction score
1,047
Points
85
They will? Even if they do, that life still has to have a creator to get it all started. There is no evidence that non-life molecules or atoms can begin life on their own. I thought you atheist-scientists were all about empirical evidence? Guess not so you should allow believers to believe without slamming us for the belief in something not seen.

the elements of the periodic table -


1659495084520.png


are life forms - everything in the universe is alive - everything except the deniers, desert religions and their offshoots ... cougarbear
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
the elements of the periodic table -


View attachment 677455

are life forms - everything in the universe is alive - everything except the deniers, desert religions and their offshoots ... cougarbear
Well, stop eating dirt cause it's alive!!! No, this shows atheists are believers in their own creators but deny the true God of the Universe who has shown himself to mankind over the millenniums. Really sad.
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
12,333
Reaction score
5,193
Points
938
Creative force? LOL!!! Life begets life. No other way...
All matter can become energy, all energy can become matter; life is the result of one and one becoming much more than just two.
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
All matter can become energy, all energy can become matter; life is the result of one and one becoming much more than just two.
From someone who has never taken a science course. Your answer is like liberals trying to define what a woman is. Non-science answers. None of what you have said is scientific. It’s more like hoping for things unseen. Religious faith of atheism.
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
12,333
Reaction score
5,193
Points
938
From someone who has never taken a science course. Your answer is like liberals trying to define what a woman is. Non-science answers. None of what you have said is scientific. It’s more like hoping for things unseen. Religious faith of atheism.
Science does a good job of explaining what is, what does exist. It tells us nothing of why everything exists. Experience has helped me to fill in the blanks that connect everything. Can you say akasha field.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
14,131
Reaction score
1,047
Points
85
everything in the universe is alive - everything except the deniers ...
Well, stop eating dirt cause it's alive!!! No, this shows atheists are believers in their own creators but deny the true God of the Universe who has shown himself to mankind over the millenniums. Really sad.

the heavenly metaphysical forces are proven by their physical representations, the universe - and have absolutely nothing to do with the vial and desolate desert religions used by those congregations to persecute and victimize the innocent. religions of servitude.
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
Science does a good job of explaining what is, what does exist. It tells us nothing of why everything exists. Experience has helped me to fill in the blanks that connect everything. Can you say akasha field.
I've answered the Akasha field in which Science has nothing to say about it, what it is or where it came from. They have a lot of guesses and theories but haven't proven a thing. So, go ahead and give me your non-science backed belief on what it is?
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
the heavenly metaphysical forces are proven by their physical representations, the universe - and have absolutely nothing to do with the vial and desolate desert religions used by those congregations to persecute and victimize the innocent. religions of servitude.
Well, all those natural metaphysical forces that have destroyed civilizations and killed millions of people over the millions of years you think people have existed is really vial and terrible.
No, nothing is proven about how life began. Let me refresh the correct definition of "life." The condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death." That is the scientific definition. Therefore, minerals and elements are not life.
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
12,333
Reaction score
5,193
Points
938
I've answered the Akasha field in which Science has nothing to say about it, what it is or where it came from. They have a lot of guesses and theories but haven't proven a thing. So, go ahead and give me your non-science backed belief on what it is?
The akasha field is definitely not scientific fact ; until we have a great quantum leap in our intelligence and knowledge can't simply isn't possible yet. It's scientific theory for now.
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
The akasha field is definitely not scientific fact ; until we have a great quantum leap in our intelligence and knowledge can't simply isn't possible yet. It's scientific theory for now.
Right. But, you believe it's the answer to how the Universe began. That is faith in something not seen nor understood if it even exists. Or, is it something else like the physical evidence of God.
 

Stann

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
12,333
Reaction score
5,193
Points
938
I know what exists. Unfortunately you do not if you get the opportunity to have a near-death experience, please take it and ask the right questions. Good night.
 

FA_Q2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
24,513
Reaction score
6,244
Points
290
Location
Washington State
They will? Even if they do, that life still has to have a creator to get it all started. There is no evidence that non-life molecules or atoms can begin life on their own. I thought you atheist-scientists were all about empirical evidence? Guess not so you should allow believers to believe without slamming us for the belief in something not seen.

RNA spontaneously forms on clay AND forms long chains that can create complex 3 dimensional shapes AND it reproduces AND it encodes information to be passed onto those reproductions.

This is ALL that is needed for the formation of life. Complex chemicals reproducing themselves, creating long chemical chains and doing so in a manner that selective processes apply to.
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198

RNA spontaneously forms on clay AND forms long chains that can create complex 3 dimensional shapes AND it reproduces AND it encodes information to be passed onto those reproductions.

This is ALL that is needed for the formation of life. Complex chemicals reproducing themselves, creating long chemical chains and doing so in a manner that selective processes apply to.
"Further, during the emergence of the protein–RNA world,5, 6 a molecular process must have existed that linked specific RNA sequences to specific peptide sequences so that one could encode the other and the latter could support the former through catalysis.7 This process may have led to the genetic code.8 But, to the best of our knowledge, no experimental conditions have been described that induce the simultaneous formation of the key molecules of genetics, metabolism, and protein synthesis."
Note that it says a molecular process MUST have existed that linked specific RNA. But, that is just a guess. And, what is that process? I dunno...You dunno... This is just more fuzzy words of wishful thinkers. Maybe it was God who stirred the process! Yep!!! Even more so, where did the elements come from to form molecules to get to this point? God is good and great!!!
 

FA_Q2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
24,513
Reaction score
6,244
Points
290
Location
Washington State
"Further, during the emergence of the protein–RNA world,5, 6 a molecular process must have existed that linked specific RNA sequences to specific peptide sequences so that one could encode the other and the latter could support the former through catalysis.7 This process may have led to the genetic code.8 But, to the best of our knowledge, no experimental conditions have been described that induce the simultaneous formation of the key molecules of genetics, metabolism, and protein synthesis."
Note that it says a molecular process MUST have existed that linked specific RNA. But, that is just a guess. And, what is that process? I dunno...You dunno... This is just more fuzzy words of wishful thinkers. Maybe it was God who stirred the process! Yep!!! Even more so, where did the elements come from to form molecules to get to this point? God is good and great!!!
Yes, we do not have 100 percent of every step.

Is that what you were expecting? Are you truly comfortable with a god of the gaps? What they established through a prediction and summarily successful experiment is that what is needed for life to begin from inanimate non-reproducing matter into reproducing life that is subject to selective processes happens naturally and spontaneously.
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
Yes, we do not have 100 percent of every step.

Is that what you were expecting? Are you truly comfortable with a god of the gaps? What they established through a prediction and summarily successful experiment is that what is needed for life to begin from inanimate non-reproducing matter into reproducing life that is subject to selective processes happens naturally and spontaneously.
According to this article, we don't have 1%. Yes, it is God who organized the universe and our earth to have life on it. How that took place, don't know. Did God plant seeds from other worlds that have life on them? Probably. Or, did he simply have the catalyst you are looking for? Mankind will never find it.
 

FA_Q2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
24,513
Reaction score
6,244
Points
290
Location
Washington State
According to this article, we don't have 1%. Yes, it is God who organized the universe and our earth to have life on it. How that took place, don't know. Did God plant seeds from other worlds that have life on them? Probably. Or, did he simply have the catalyst you are looking for? Mankind will never find it.
According to the article we have a shit ton of those steps.

That you want to ignore that is irrelevant nor does it address that it established with verified, repeatable and predicted experimentation the very basis required for matter that is not considered life to reproduce, form long chains that can create complex 3 dimensional shapes and encode information to be passed onto those reproductions which is all that is needed for life to develop.

What you have is zero predictions, zero observations and zero experiments that back your assertions that it was god. You do have a LOT of failed predictions, every single 'impossible' step you cling to ends up being quite possible and observed.

I repeat, your last statement is nothing but an appeal to God of the gaps. That you seem to be okay with such a position is simply devoid of logic.
 

Cougarbear

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Messages
3,325
Reaction score
1,462
Points
198
According to the article we have a shit ton of those steps.

That you want to ignore that is irrelevant nor does it address that it established with verified, repeatable and predicted experimentation the very basis required for matter that is not considered life to reproduce, form long chains that can create complex 3 dimensional shapes and encode information to be passed onto those reproductions which is all that is needed for life to develop.

What you have is zero predictions, zero observations and zero experiments that back your assertions that it was god. You do have a LOT of failed predictions, every single 'impossible' step you cling to ends up being quite possible and observed.

I repeat, your last statement is nothing but an appeal to God of the gaps. That you seem to be okay with such a position is simply devoid of logic.
Actually, it says we don't. It's all guess work so far. But, why should I expect from atheist liberals to care about language. To you guys a man can get pregnant.
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

Forum List

Top