Bengazi documents disprove all Pub myths

[Antares]

There were MANY protests/attacks earlier that day. No, we won't know until we talk to the militia leader.And the ambassador refused reinforcements. So as Hillary says, what diff does all your bs make...

It's a tragedy, only Fox etc and the dupes would lie for politics like this, a disgrace...

Yeah, Fox is the only TV station that lies for politics. MSNBC believes the president when he said the ACA will save you $2,500 per year and you will be able to keep your plan. Even though, intelligent people knew that could not and had no chance of happening.

So, yes, there were attacks in other places during the day, but we kept the ambassador in a country who wasn't being governed, with a bunch of known terrorists training in the area with not enough security, because he said he didn't need anymore people.

Only Foxbots think Obama said 2500 immediately- So insurers want their last big theft and won't just improve the policies- just take your better plan lol...life's a ***** and Pubs and their cronies always make it hard, dupes...

Those weren't terrorists, just freedom fighters ooops. You don't care about facts or what life is like or what's good for the country, just want to get your hated president...real patriots lol.

Golly wet back....who do you think approved the rates for these plans?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Declassified Benghazi Transcripts Debunk Fox's Favorite Myths | Research | Media Matters for America

Nope.

Was Benghazi a Terrorist attack, or a result of a video defaming Islam? According to a Senate Intelligence Report released today, it was a terrorist attack. In fact on the title page of the report, they are called "terrorist attacks."

On page 40 it states:

Individuals affiliated with terrorist groups, including AQIM, Ansar al-Sharia, AQAP, and the Mohammad Jamal Network, participated in the September 11, 2012 attacks. Intelligence suggests that the attack was not a highly coordinated plot, but was opportunistic; however, well-armed attackers easily overwhelmed the Libyan security guards and the five U.S. Diplomatic Security agents present at the Temporary Mission Facility.

Was the attack preventable or unavoidable? According to this report, it was. Were people warned or was there no way to predict it? According to this report, people were indeed warned, and they willingly ignored these warnings. Page 1 of the Overview states:

The Majority believes that the terrorists attacks against U.S. personnel at the Temporary Mission Facility and the Annex in Benghazi, Libya on September 11 and 12, 2012, were likely preventable based on the known security shortfalls at the U.S. mission and the significant strategic (although not tactical) warnings from the Intelligence Community (IC) about the deteriorating security situation in Libya.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...ee-review-terror-attacks-on-us-facilities-in/

 

[francoHFW]

Of course, it can be a terrorist attack in reaction to the video....you really need a break from the brainwash ...

 

[brfrad]

There were MANY protests/attacks earlier that day. No, we won't know until we talk to the militia leader.And the ambassador refused reinforcements. So as Hillary says, what diff does all your bs make...

It's a tragedy, only Fox etc and the dupes would lie for politics like this, a disgrace...

Yeah, Fox is the only TV station that lies for politics. MSNBC believes the president when he said the ACA will save you $2,500 per year and you will be able to keep your plan. Even though, intelligent people knew that could not and had no chance of happening.

So, yes, there were attacks in other places during the day, but we kept the ambassador in a country who wasn't being governed, with a bunch of known terrorists training in the area with not enough security, because he said he didn't need anymore people.

Only Foxbots think Obama said 2500 immediately- So insurers want their last big theft and won't just improve the policies- just take your better plan lol...life's a ***** and Pubs and their cronies always make it hard, dupes...

Those weren't terrorists, just freedom fighters ooops. You don't care about facts or what life is like or what's good for the country, just want to get your hated president...real patriots lol.

So, now because we are discussing the timing of when Obama said it he didn't say it? I heard it from his own mouth, and MSNBC ran with it until the ACA was fully implemented, and people started to find out their costs were skyrocketing.

Your right that I don't like the president because he is anti-American. I don't need Fox News to tell me that. I have believes that I know only work in the real world. Not some mythical utopia the president and his people want you to believe. They want you to believe that if you give certain people stuff from other people's money that the poor people will not be so bad off, and the rich will be happy to be forced to give their money away. That if you raise minimum wage, people will be able to finally afford food because there employers mistreat them so unfairly. Well, a couple things are wrong with those opinions. First, the rich will start resenting the fact that you are taking items they earned to give to people who did not earn them. Second, the poor will have no motivation to better themselves. Finally, increasing minimum wage will a) raise the cost of living, and b) raise the unemployment rate. Meaning that your increase in minimum wage will be nothing due to the fact the value of the dollar will stay the same, and companies will lay workers off because they can't afford to pay them more.

I'm even going with your facts in the Benghazi incident We knew about the video. We knew that there was a calls for protest, and we knew what day it was going to happen. Yet, we didn't have enough security in a troubled country with known terrorists, as evidenced by the fact that 4 Americans died in that country.

 

[francoHFW]

Not nice to say maybe, but the Ambassador wanted to be there and refused reinforcements. Brave, admirable, or dumb....

As for your ''believes''- it's just what greedy idiot a-holes want you to believe. You want to pander to the rich, a bad idea that gets you a crappy banana republic. Voodoo has made the rich richer and ruined the country...see sig para 1....

 

[Kosh]

WOW the far left believes the George Soros funded far left blog site media matters.

 

[francoHFW]

And MM actually quotes the documents instead of making up stuff about them...Pub dupes...

 

[Kosh]

And MM actually quotes the documents instead of making up stuff about them...Pub dupes...

Proof that the far left should not be in charge of anything, including being allowed to use a computer.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Of course, it can be a terrorist attack in reaction to the video....you really need a break from the brainwash ...

You're the brainwashed one, franco. Primarily because you cite people like Media Matters. You need a break from the bullshit...

 

[francoHFW]

Yeah, MM and its direct quotes, no spin at all....how brainwashed of me lol...LOL

 

[Ronin]

Thanks for the links. The transcripts show a lot of dialogue- but they have a lot blacked out as well. So its it is not completely accurate putting into declassified status. Its difficult to find unbiased reporting anymore.

Has the accusation Obama directed 400 surface to air missiles to be transported from Libya to Syria, only to have them disappear after the attack turned out to be bullshit?

 

[francoHFW]

The Rachel Maddow Show
As of today, three U.S. Senate committees, four U.S. House committees, and the Accountability Review Board all agree: there was no Benghazi conspiracy.

Maybe it's time for Republicans and Fox to move on?

Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories | MSNBC
Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories
msnbc.com

 

[Kosh]

The Rachel Maddow Show
As of today, three U.S. Senate committees, four U.S. House committees, and the Accountability Review Board all agree: there was no Benghazi conspiracy.

Maybe it's time for Republicans and Fox to move on?

Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories | MSNBC
Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories
msnbc.com

And the far left once again believes another far left propaganda sources as truth.

 

[francoHFW]

zzzz you have no idea what far left means lol...

 

[BlindBoo]

Panetta testified that they knew it was a terror attack. It's on record. Stop with your bullshit will you?

This is testimony under oath.

What does what we called the attack have any thing to do with the price of tea in China?

Obama immediately called this an "act of terror." What's your point?

I'm getting so sick of this dance. Look on record and under oath testimony TERROR ATTACK.

Freaking give it up.

??????

No what he said was this.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

That is a general statement about terrorism it is not calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror. If you however do accept that statement is calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror why the following weekend was Susan Rice sent on all the Sunday morning talk shows claiming it was about a video?

She qualified her statement on every show with the fact that an investigation was ongoing and that we would have to wait until that is complete for the answers. Media Talking Points were developed and given out. Susan Rice was demonized unjustly for simply doing the job.

 

[BlindBoo]

Of course, it can be a terrorist attack in reaction to the video....you really need a break from the brainwash ...

Yep.

"Intelligence suggests that the attack was not a highly coordinated plot, but was opportunistic......"

 

[Jarhead]

What does what we called the attack have any thing to do with the price of tea in China?

Obama immediately called this an "act of terror." What's your point?



??????

No what he said was this.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

That is a general statement about terrorism it is not calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror. If you however do accept that statement is calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror why the following weekend was Susan Rice sent on all the Sunday morning talk shows claiming it was about a video?

She qualified her statement on every show with the fact that an investigation was ongoing and that we would have to wait until that is complete for the answers. Media Talking Points were developed and given out. Susan Rice was demonize unjustly for simply doing the job.

Actually, what she did was have her cake and eat it too.

In every interview she said "in fact" when discussing the video as the cause for the attack....and then toward the end she would say "it is an ongoing investigation"

Just as Obama did...he had his cake and eat it too...

He talked of the video, said no act of terror will be tolerated.....and therefore gave reason for people to believe he was blaming the video AND still had the abiulity to say "look at the video tape, I called it an act of terror at the very beginning.

Now....if you don't see that, then you are exactly what he thinks you are....one who easily falls for his gift for gab.

 

[BlindBoo]

No what he said was this.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

That is a general statement about terrorism it is not calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror. If you however do accept that statement is calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror why the following weekend was Susan Rice sent on all the Sunday morning talk shows claiming it was about a video?

She qualified her statement on every show with the fact that an investigation was ongoing and that we would have to wait until that is complete for the answers. Media Talking Points were developed and given out. Susan Rice was demonize unjustly for simply doing the job.

Actually, what she did was have her cake and eat it too.

In every interview she said "in fact" when discussing the video as the cause for the attack....and then toward the end she would say "it is an ongoing investigation"

Just as Obama did...he had his cake and eat it too...

He talked of the video, said no act of terror will be tolerated.....and therefore gave reason for people to believe he was blaming the video AND still had the abiulity to say "look at the video tape, I called it an act of terror at the very beginning.

Now....if you don't see that, then you are exactly what he thinks you are....one who easily falls for his gift for gab.

Truth be told I watched her on Meet the Press. She came on right after the President of Libya. She gave her disclaimer in the beginning. It was obvious that she was disseminating carefully crafted talking points (aka Propaganda) kinda like Condoleezza Rice did in the run up to the Iraq Invasion. It would have been stupid to assume they were telling the world everything they knew. In fact they would have been stupid(perhaps criminal) if they did.

 

[blackhawk]

What does what we called the attack have any thing to do with the price of tea in China?

Obama immediately called this an "act of terror." What's your point?



??????

No what he said was this.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

That is a general statement about terrorism it is not calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror. If you however do accept that statement is calling Benghazi a terrorist attack or act of terror why the following weekend was Susan Rice sent on all the Sunday morning talk shows claiming it was about a video?

She qualified her statement on every show with the fact that an investigation was ongoing and that we would have to wait until that is complete for the answers. Media Talking Points were developed and given out. Susan Rice was demonized unjustly for simply doing the job.

Susan Rice was demonized as you put for trying to sell bullshit story to the public about Benghazi. If you don't know the motivation for the attack you say we don't know at this time not throw a video out there as the reason and then try and justify that deception with but were still investigating. It's also telling she never mentions terrorist attack as motive for Benghazi withe disclaimer were still investigating you would think that would be front and center with a attack on Americans in the Middle East on the anniversary of the 2001 9-11 attacks.

 

[Antares]

The Rachel Maddow Show
As of today, three U.S. Senate committees, four U.S. House committees, and the Accountability Review Board all agree: there was no Benghazi conspiracy.

Maybe it's time for Republicans and Fox to move on?

Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories | MSNBC
Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories
msnbc.com

Maddow.....um ok.