What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Atomic bomb

Unkotare

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
107,016
Reaction score
15,525
Points
2,180
...

On the other hand, some of those 25% might be alive but have different complexions and eye shapes since they would have been born to American women forced to perform as "comfort women" for Jap(anese) soldiers.
...

Absolute nonsense.
 

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
42,875
Reaction score
10,779
Points
2,030
I have to agree with those who say the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved more lives than they killed. The firebombing of Tokyo killed more than the bombings of hamburg and Dresden together. Many more than the atomic bomb. If the atom bomb had not been used what was the alternative? More fire bombings? Starve Japan with the navy blockade. Invasion of Japan would have been much more bloody than invasion of Germany was.
Also American soldiers and Navy were still fighting the Japanese in Philipines and other battles as well as fighting kamikazes. American lives were being lost and more would be lost if not for the atom bomb. If the bomb had not been used and later the people discovered the war could have been ended fast with it and it was not used would political careers not be ruined?
yes the good old days where our military could kill millions of civilians
Good old days,what are you talking about? They still are.
 

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
42,875
Reaction score
10,779
Points
2,030
The war was over before he took charge from Stalin’s Stooge. Then he went an mass murdered thousands of defenseless Japanese women and children, yet you find this admirable.

Damn right!

Of course all you know about World War II came only from your indoctrination and maybe the word of one or two people who went into hiding to escape their duty to America.

Truman's ultimate nipping of the Nips saved countless thousands of American lives. Yes, Japan would have ultimately surrendered but only after countless Americans died without reason.

There were going to be horrendous death tolls either way.

Of course you would have far much more preferred that they be AMERICAN dead rather than Japs.
Would you have felt that way had a parent been among those "murdered" as you choose to style it? Or, wait, would you even be here? Yeah, given that possibility....maybe it would have been better your way.

Think that through before replying. If you are allowed to....or if you are capable.
I’m not the one who believes the lying State. You are. Our criminal government didn’t need to occupy Japan. Only fools and pussies think Truman right, in mass murdering defenseless women and children. Men of honor never murder women and children. Cowards do.

Do you condemn the firebombing of Tokyo that killed many more than the atom bomb?
Absolutely. I also condemn the terrible fire bombings of German civilians. The Dresden fire bombing was one of the worst. There were no military installations there. It was a war crime that Churchill should have been hung for.

The USA has a long history of using total war, mass murdering defenseless civilians, though most Americans are uninformed of our criminal government’s atrocities. It started with Dishonest Abe, who committed treason by murdering Americans. He too should have been hung as a war criminal.

You might point out to the Asian poster in this thread that he is a hypocrite. He condemns Truman’s actions, but loves Dishonest Abe’s. Dumb. Really dumb.

i agree Dresden was wrong. But for the atom bomb how many would have died if it had not been used? At the time American soldiers were training for the big one. Invasion of Japan. That would be very bloody. And how would the American people react if they discovered the war could have been ended fast and was not? political careers would have ended.
No. Wrong. What it would have been is a massacre of Japanese women, children, and old men by US troops. Americans seem to think, as you do, that Japan should have just stopped fighting while they were being mercilessly destroyed from the air, by US bombers. If we were invaded by a foreign force intent on destroying us, most Americans were put up a fight, just as the Japanese would have.

Are you aware that months before the A bombings, the US bombing missions went to daylight bombing WITHOUT fighter support? Japan couldn’t do shit to defend itself, yet the bombings continued daily killing thousands of civilians...women and children.

Another thing Americans never consider is why did we need to invade and occupy Japan’s home islands? Why? They were done. Their navy and air forces destroyed. Accept their surrender and go home. Unfortunately the US government was an imperialist force then, as it is today.
As always,you did an excellent job of taking the op to school. :thup: :thankusmile:
 

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
42,875
Reaction score
10,779
Points
2,030
The war was over before he took charge from Stalin’s Stooge. Then he went an mass murdered thousands of defenseless Japanese women and children, yet you find this admirable.

Damn right!

Of course all you know about World War II came only from your indoctrination and maybe the word of one or two people who went into hiding to escape their duty to America.

Truman's ultimate nipping of the Nips saved countless thousands of American lives. Yes, Japan would have ultimately surrendered but only after countless Americans died without reason.

There were going to be horrendous death tolls either way.

Of course you would have far much more preferred that they be AMERICAN dead rather than Japs.
Would you have felt that way had a parent been among those "murdered" as you choose to style it? Or, wait, would you even be here? Yeah, given that possibility....maybe it would have been better your way.

Think that through before replying. If you are allowed to....or if you are capable.
I’m not the one who believes the lying State. You are. Our criminal government didn’t need to occupy Japan. Only fools and pussies think Truman right, in mass murdering defenseless women and children. Men of honor never murder women and children. Cowards do.

Do you condemn the firebombing of Tokyo that killed many more than the atom bomb?
Absolutely. I also condemn the terrible fire bombings of German civilians. The Dresden fire bombing was one of the worst. There were no military installations there. It was a war crime that Churchill should have been hung for.

The USA has a long history of using total war, mass murdering defenseless civilians, though most Americans are uninformed of our criminal government’s atrocities. It started with Dishonest Abe, who committed treason by murdering Americans. He too should have been hung as a war criminal.

You might point out to the Asian poster in this thread that he is a hypocrite. He condemns Truman’s actions, but loves Dishonest Abe’s. Dumb. Really dumb.
You forgot to mention it was warmonger Ike responsible for the bombing of those innocent civilians at Dresden.yeah no other government of any country compares to ours as the most corrupt atrocities in war. Have you ever noticed it’s the war criminal traiters who always get on our coins? Ike,fdr,Lincoln,it goes on and on.
 

gipper

Libertarian/Anarchist
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
44,169
Reaction score
15,234
Points
2,250
The war was over before he took charge from Stalin’s Stooge. Then he went an mass murdered thousands of defenseless Japanese women and children, yet you find this admirable.

Damn right!

Of course all you know about World War II came only from your indoctrination and maybe the word of one or two people who went into hiding to escape their duty to America.

Truman's ultimate nipping of the Nips saved countless thousands of American lives. Yes, Japan would have ultimately surrendered but only after countless Americans died without reason.

There were going to be horrendous death tolls either way.

Of course you would have far much more preferred that they be AMERICAN dead rather than Japs.
Would you have felt that way had a parent been among those "murdered" as you choose to style it? Or, wait, would you even be here? Yeah, given that possibility....maybe it would have been better your way.

Think that through before replying. If you are allowed to....or if you are capable.
I’m not the one who believes the lying State. You are. Our criminal government didn’t need to occupy Japan. Only fools and pussies think Truman right, in mass murdering defenseless women and children. Men of honor never murder women and children. Cowards do.

Do you condemn the firebombing of Tokyo that killed many more than the atom bomb?
Absolutely. I also condemn the terrible fire bombings of German civilians. The Dresden fire bombing was one of the worst. There were no military installations there. It was a war crime that Churchill should have been hung for.

The USA has a long history of using total war, mass murdering defenseless civilians, though most Americans are uninformed of our criminal government’s atrocities. It started with Dishonest Abe, who committed treason by murdering Americans. He too should have been hung as a war criminal.

You might point out to the Asian poster in this thread that he is a hypocrite. He condemns Truman’s actions, but loves Dishonest Abe’s. Dumb. Really dumb.
You forgot to mention it was warmonger Ike responsible for the bombing of those innocent civilians at Dresden.yeah no other government of any country compares to ours as the most corrupt atrocities in war. Have you ever noticed it’s the war criminal traiters who always get on our coins? Ike,fdr,Lincoln,it goes on and on.
From what I’ve read about Dresden, it was Churchill and the Brits that demanded it. I don’t believe Ike wanted it done, but didn’t stop it if he could have.
 

Blues Man

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
16,956
Reaction score
6,027
Points
290
I have to agree with those who say the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved more lives than they killed. The firebombing of Tokyo killed more than the bombings of hamburg and Dresden together. Many more than the atomic bomb. If the atom bomb had not been used what was the alternative? More fire bombings? Starve Japan with the navy blockade. Invasion of Japan would have been much more bloody than invasion of Germany was.
Also American soldiers and Navy were still fighting the Japanese in Philipines and other battles as well as fighting kamikazes. American lives were being lost and more would be lost if not for the atom bomb. If the bomb had not been used and later the people discovered the war could have been ended fast with it and it was not used would political careers not be ruined?
yes the good old days where our military could kill millions of civilians
Good old days,what are you talking about? They still are.
we do not carpet bomb cities anymore with no regard of how many civilians we kill
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$95.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top