That's like liberals arguing liberal vs. conservative based on definitions in the dictionary.
But as I have often reminded liberals, "dictionaries define words, ACTIONS define people."
And when liberals talk about "bi-partisanship" they are not talking about the French root word "partisan."
This is what I'm addressing. Liberals use the word as IF anyone that isn't a "liberal" is a partisan and MUST compromise their view, so as to be "bi-partisan."
In that context, we are all "partisans" because we all have VIEWS on the issues.
The question is then, IS THAT WRONG, and must we compromise those views so as NOT to be partisan.
I have YET to find a liberal who EVER offers to compromise their views.
Moderates are no better. They claim NOT to be "blinded" by parties, but you get them in a discussion and they are just as opinionated as the people they sooooooooooo look down on for being the same.
Partisanship as a premise is a joke.
IOW all you have is empty bluster ad bullshit and partisanship is still antithetical to democracy, republic and our constitution despite your flacid objections.
Get a room with yourself or hire a shrink. I wish you a recovery.
I think we see the empty bluster in the fact you can't even REFUTE a thing I've said. You just started attacking me personally.
BTW, didn't you just lose by falling for your OWN condemnation of partisanship?
It's one thing to have a strong opinion on an issue.
It's another to believe that everyone who disagrees with your opinion is mentally ill.
DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, !!!!!!!!!!!
We have a winner!
Looks like you AGREED with that assessment and then DID JUST THAT, when I DISAGREED WITH YOU!!!!!!!




Sorry pal, but you are hoist by your own petard.
Liberals, er I mean "moderates" always were such self righteous hypocrites.



