Are you okay with Trump's current retribution?

What's your thoughts on Trump's current retribution?


  • Total voters
    19
Are you thinking the media raped Laken Riley and crushed her skull?

No, just wondering why you choose to bring her up considering all the victims of violent crimes in the country. I'm also thinking back on of how the folks would follow the right-wing media's French jokes as if the Iraq would be any more grateful. What really got to me was all those days pulling into the office parking lot during the GWB administration and seeing the U.S. flag flying at half-mast.
 
Since we have hpyer-partisan MODs on staff pretending this isn't happening, so I have to spell it out for them, Trump's retribution includes, but is not limited to him legally attacking and going after anyone who slighted him, whether real or imagined and whether legitimately or illegitimately.

Here's a couple of links for the hyper-partisan people in power to chew on....



That said, why/why not?
Nobody cares about Trump's retribution. They have no idea it is going on.

Ask someone (if you have anyone you know....which might be dobutful).

Russia investigation. Big deal. The only people making a huge fuss over it was you assclowns on the left.
 
Considering how the Democrats have illegally hassled and charged and convicted and smeared and lied about Trump for a decade now, I certainly wouldn't blame him if there were an element of "retribution" involved.
The way I figure it, anything that weakens/destroys/hurts the Democrat Party and the America Left is a Good Thing. It makes America a better place.
NO political party work in the better interest of the majority of the population.
To many $$$$$$ lovers.
 
Why do libs like @my2¢ play the media card on conservatives when Trump gets 92% negative media reporting? Isn’t the libs who have played/programmed by the media?

You wonder why because you don't know squat about my politics nor what media I follow.

You want respectable media, steer clear of media of either the left or right where they handfeed garbage to those too lazy to think for themselves.

A much better choice are the plentiful trade, business, and investment media. And when it comes to news events, sources that are local to those events are much better at sticking with the journalism rules of Who, What, When, Where, Why, with the least bit of editorial opinion.
 
You wonder why because you don't know squat about my politics nor what media I follow.

You want respectable media, steer clear of media of either the left or right where they handfeed garbage to those too lazy to think for themselves.

A much better choice are the plentiful trade, business, and investment media. And when it comes to news events, sources that are local to those events are much better at sticking with the journalism rules of Who, What, When, Where, Why, with the least bit of editorial opinion.
While I don't agree with your last paragraph (our local stuff is pretty tainted), I do agree with your general sentiment.
 

Are you okay with Trump's current retribution?​


Maurene Comey isn't.

Maurene Comey’s lawsuit against DOJ over her firing can proceed, judge rules​

NEW YORK — Maurene Comey can pursue her lawsuit against the Justice Department for her abrupt termination as a Manhattan federal prosecutor, a federal judge ruled Tuesday, handing her a significant victory against the department.

Lawyers for the department had argued that Comey needed to bring her claims before the Merit Systems Protection Board, an executive branch agency that oversees federal workers’ complaints alleging violations of civil service laws. Comey’s lawyers argued that would have doomed her case.

 
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman wrote in a 27-page opinion that because Comey was fired pursuant to Article II of the Constitution, rather than the Civil Service Reform Act, her lawsuit should remain in federal court.

“The Court finds that Comey’s claims are not of the type Congress intended to be reviewed within that scheme because it would deprive her of meaningful judicial review, her claims are wholly collateral to the CSRA’s review provisions, and her claims — which raise fundamental constitutional questions — fall outside of the MSPB’s traditional expertise,” Furman wrote.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom