Are the anti-science zealots accepting anthropogenic climate change yet?

Lets put it this way…

No Scientist living or dead has ever provided proof that flat earth conservative deniers are willing to accept



And you clods have never left your anti science religious dogma that claims only climatologists can understand their holy scriptures.
 
Testable, repeatable, quantifiable, and falsifiable.....That's how science works, doomsayer.
Testy, repetitive, unqualified, false claims? How alarmodenieristas like you work?
OMG:eek: , no major hurricanes have hit the U.S. this year!:icon_cry:
WHAM! Fiona
WHAM! Ian
OMG:omg:, only two major hurricanes have hit the U.S. this year!:102:
 
Testy, repetitive, unqualified, false claims? How alarmodenieristas like you work?
OMG:eek: , no major hurricanes have hit the U.S. this year!:icon_cry:
WHAM! Fiona
WHAM! Ian
OMG:omg:, only two major hurricanes have hit the U.S. this year!:102:



Compared to years when five, or six, or shit even 10 have.

DURRRRRR
 
Compared to years when five, or six, or shit even 10 have.

DURRRRRR
Alrighty then. Sending 8 warm, moist clouds in your general direction..
Looks like you've sensed them already..
17281.jpg

Hmm?:disbelief:
Elderberries?
Dingleberries?
 
Alrighty then. Sending 8 warm, moist clouds in your general direction..
Looks like you've sensed them already..
17281.jpg

Hmm?:disbelief:
Elderberries?
Dingleberries?



You implied that two hurricanes was somehow significant. Historical fact says it isn’t.

DURRRRRR
 
And you clods have never left your anti science religious dogma that claims only climatologists can understand their holy scriptures.
Why would the people who present the fictitious documents turn against each other! Isn’t it natural they would all stay consistent? No one with a different view would be a part of such stupid
 
No, there isn't. There are computer models only.

Models are not data.
That is a falsehood. There are billions and billions of empirical observations that provide overwhelming evidentiary support. I remind you that the theory predates computers or their models.
 
That is a falsehood. There are billions and billions of empirical observations that provide overwhelming evidentiary support. I remind you that the theory predates computers or their models.
So respectfully, why can’t you ever post one?
 
That is a falsehood. There are billions and billions of empirical observations that provide overwhelming evidentiary support. I remind you that the theory predates computers or their models.
The geologic record is littered with examples of warming and cooling trends that were not caused by CO2 or orbital forcing.
 
How much do you think a ten foot rise in sea level will reduce our standard of living?

If we cut our CO2 to zero and China keeps increasing their CO2, how many years will that ten foot rise be delayed? 10 years? 20?

How much lower will our GDP be after cutting CO2 to zero?
 
How much do you think a ten foot rise in sea level will reduce our standard of living?
I have not seen such a rise

Its always 25 years in the future

And has been since the first eco scientist got his first government grant
 
You implied that two hurricanes was somehow significant. Historical fact says it isn’t.

DURRRRRR
Try not to infer stupid things, DURP, but.. Historical fact says hurricane season here runs from June through November. And:
This year’s Atlantic Ocean hurricane season has had a distinct whiplash vibe.

It started in May with predictions of an above-average Atlantic hurricane season. June through August passed with barely a peep from the tropics, and then wham! — two significant, potentially devastating storms formed and struck parts of the U.S. within a week of one another. First, Hurricane Fiona dropped 30 inches of rain on Puerto Rico and knocked power out to the entire island, and now Hurricane Ian is barreling toward the west coast of Florida, threatening a dangerous storm surge in Tampa, Fort Myers and elsewhere.

“It has been an unusual year,” said Phil Klotzbach, a senior research scientist and hurricane expert at Colorado State University. “We had no named storms in August for the first time since 1997, and since then we’ve had six named storms, four hurricanes and two major hurricanes.”

Bigger, stronger, faster​

The total number of Atlantic tropical cyclones has not increased dramatically over the last few decades.


But they do seem to be getting more damaging: Of the 15 costliest storms to hit the U.S., all but one have arrived this century. (Hurricane Andrew, in 1992, is the exception.)

Why is that? For one, climate change appears to be helping them get stronger, faster.

“Analysis of hurricane observations over the last 40 years or so do suggest that rapid intensification of hurricanes has increased in the central-eastern Atlantic,”
 
Last edited:
Try not to infer stupid things, DURP, but.. Historical fact says hurricane season here runs from June through November. And:

But they do seem to be getting more damaging: Of the 15 costliest storms to hit the U.S., all but one have arrived this century. (Hurricane Andrew, in 1992, is the exception.)

Why is that? For one, climate change appears to be helping them get stronger, faster.


More houses, more built in risky areas, more expensive houses.
 

Forum List

Back
Top