Another win for Trump, loss for Sanctuary cities

ReinyDays said:
This only effects sanctuary cities that receive Federal funding ... so, no loss in the cities that don't ... ha ha ha ... the others, it's the price they pay to suckle at the eagle's tit ...
Click to expand...


~~~~~~
I agree with you.
There is federal law and Home rule Law. The laws should not be interfered with. The Federal law is based upon de minimus rules. States must follow at a minimum the laws set forth by the federal government. They may make the stronger but not less than the Federal ruling. Therefore if the state(s) refuse to follow Federal laws they can be refused federal funding. Sanctuary cities violate the de minimus Federal law by refusing to cooperate with existing Federal law.
Again, no thanks to bench legislating biased judges this has been allowed to go on too long.
 
Doc7505 said:
ReinyDays said:
This only effects sanctuary cities that receive Federal funding ... so, no loss in the cities that don't ... ha ha ha ... the others, it's the price they pay to suckle at the eagle's tit ...
Click to expand...


~~~~~~
I agree with you.
There is federal law and Home rule Law. The laws should not be interfered with. The Federal law is based upon de minimus rules. States must follow at a minimum the laws set forth by the federal government. They may make the stronger but not less than the Federal ruling. Therefore if the state(s) refuse to follow Federal laws they can be refused federal funding. Sanctuary cities violate the de minimus Federal law by refusing to cooperate with existing Federal law.
Again, no thanks to bench legislating biased judges this has been allowed to go on too long.
Click to expand...

I'm a big states rights person, but the problem is when they harbor these illegals, those illegals can leave and go to other states that are not sanctuary and don't want them around. It's the same with drivers licenses that Trump is also taking a stand on. If you want illegals driving in your state, that's up to you. But once you have a drivers license from one state, it's accepted in all other states.
 
Doc7505 said:
ReinyDays said:
This only effects sanctuary cities that receive Federal funding ... so, no loss in the cities that don't ... ha ha ha ... the others, it's the price they pay to suckle at the eagle's tit ...
Click to expand...


~~~~~~
I agree with you.
There is federal law and Home rule Law. The laws should not be interfered with. The Federal law is based upon de minimus rules. States must follow at a minimum the laws set forth by the federal government. They may make the stronger but not less than the Federal ruling. Therefore if the state(s) refuse to follow Federal laws they can be refused federal funding. Sanctuary cities violate the de minimus Federal law by refusing to cooperate with existing Federal law.
Again, no thanks to bench legislating biased judges this has been allowed to go on too long.
Click to expand...
The bong thing you are correct about is that the states may offer greater personal protection than the feds. That is why if Donald choosss to violate people individual rights, the states can impose greater protections.

so while you use a turn of phrase that you read somewhere, you are clueless about what it means.
Common problem among trumpkins.
 
Nostra said:
Awesome!

He should immediately cut all funding to any and all of these cities.

Court hands Trump win in sanctuary city fight, says administration can deny grant money


A federal appeals court on Wednesday handed a major win to the Trump administration in its fight against “sanctuary” jurisdictions, ruling that it can deny grant money to states that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York overturned a lower court ruling that stopped the administration’s 2017 move to withhold grant money from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, which dispenses over $250 million a year to state and local criminal justice efforts.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO DEPLOY BORDER PATROL TO SANCTUARY CITIES TO HELP ICE CATCH ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

“Today’s decision rightfully recognizes the lawful authority of the Attorney General to ensure that Department of Justice grant recipients are not at the same time thwarting federal law enforcement priorities,” a DOJ spokesman said in a statement. “The grant conditions here require states and cities that receive DOJ grants to share information about criminals in custody. The federal government uses this information to enforce national immigration laws--policies supported by successive Democrat and Republican administrations.”

“All Americans will benefit from increased public safety as this Administration is able to implement its lawful immigration and public safety policies,” the statement said.

Court hands Trump win in sanctuary city fight, says administration can deny grant money
Click to expand...

I don't think he can cut anything yet. We know that they will never give up until the Supreme Court gets the case.....if they decide to take it.
 
jillian said:
Doc7505 said:
ReinyDays said:
This only effects sanctuary cities that receive Federal funding ... so, no loss in the cities that don't ... ha ha ha ... the others, it's the price they pay to suckle at the eagle's tit ...
Click to expand...


~~~~~~
I agree with you.
There is federal law and Home rule Law. The laws should not be interfered with. The Federal law is based upon de minimus rules. States must follow at a minimum the laws set forth by the federal government. They may make the stronger but not less than the Federal ruling. Therefore if the state(s) refuse to follow Federal laws they can be refused federal funding. Sanctuary cities violate the de minimus Federal law by refusing to cooperate with existing Federal law.
Again, no thanks to bench legislating biased judges this has been allowed to go on too long.
Click to expand...
The bong thing you are correct about is that the states may offer greater personal protection than the feds. That is why if Donald choosss to violate people individual rights, the states can impose greater protections.

so while you use a turn of phrase that you read somewhere, you are clueless about what it means.
Common problem among trumpkins.
Click to expand...

~~~~~~
No, I taught you civics that you were not taught in high school. BTW for more than 10 years I was involved in the governing a town. Like all Leftists you've got it wrong. Offering sanctuary from Federal law is contrary to the law.
 
jillian said:
Doc7505 said:
ReinyDays said:
This only effects sanctuary cities that receive Federal funding ... so, no loss in the cities that don't ... ha ha ha ... the others, it's the price they pay to suckle at the eagle's tit ...
Click to expand...


~~~~~~
I agree with you.
There is federal law and Home rule Law. The laws should not be interfered with. The Federal law is based upon de minimus rules. States must follow at a minimum the laws set forth by the federal government. They may make the stronger but not less than the Federal ruling. Therefore if the state(s) refuse to follow Federal laws they can be refused federal funding. Sanctuary cities violate the de minimus Federal law by refusing to cooperate with existing Federal law.
Again, no thanks to bench legislating biased judges this has been allowed to go on too long.
Click to expand...
The bong thing you are correct about is that the states may offer greater personal protection than the feds. That is why if Donald choosss to violate people individual rights, the states can impose greater protections.

so while you use a turn of phrase that you read somewhere, you are clueless about what it means.
Common problem among trumpkins.
Click to expand...

People don't have "individual rights." Those are exclusively reserved for citizens, not illegals.

Although I can understand why you don't know the difference. Common problem among leftards..
 
Last edited:
Doc7505 said:
ReinyDays said:
This only effects sanctuary cities that receive Federal funding ... so, no loss in the cities that don't ... ha ha ha ... the others, it's the price they pay to suckle at the eagle's tit ...
Click to expand...


~~~~~~
I agree with you.
There is federal law and Home rule Law. The laws should not be interfered with. The Federal law is based upon de minimus rules. States must follow at a minimum the laws set forth by the federal government. They may make the stronger but not less than the Federal ruling. Therefore if the state(s) refuse to follow Federal laws they can be refused federal funding. Sanctuary cities violate the de minimus Federal law by refusing to cooperate with existing Federal law.
Again, no thanks to bench legislating biased judges this has been allowed to go on too long.
Click to expand...

Doc, you're on top of your game today! :bow2:
 
upload_2020-2-26_16-47-55.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

This nation was founded and built on Free-dom and not on Free-shit

< Previous Thread

EQUALITY<<<<——>>>>Freedom / pick a side

Next Thread >

Similar threads

marvin martian
In 2021, Biden said he would abolish ICE "in 5 days"; now he's changed his tune
Replies
0
Views
69
marvin martian
marvin martian
1miseryindex
The Defund Sanctuary Cities bill in Congress: Republicans want to cut federal aid to sanctuary states
2 3
Replies
48
Views
847
Orangecat
Orangecat
Doc7505
New York Doomed to Be Migrant Central—Other Cities Take Note
2
Replies
31
Views
310
BluesLegend
BluesLegend
E
Some segments of American
Replies
9
Views
141
BluesLegend
BluesLegend
MaryL
Sanctuary cities: The thing about THAT
Replies
10
Views
175
TheGreatSatan
TheGreatSatan

Latest Discussions

Mac1958
  • Poll
POLL: Do you WANT to heal our divisions?
37 38 39
Replies
763
Views
4K
The Duke
The Duke
Mac1958
Has the DC political center had enough?
8 9 10
Replies
190
Views
857
ThisIsMe
T
Coyote
Zone1 Embryos and Personhood
33 34 35
Replies
693
Views
6K
NotfooledbyW
NotfooledbyW
JimH52
trump is guilty of violating Penal Law Section 215.15 Intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree
Replies
7
Views
32
Lemmi
Lemmi
MarcATL
America Has Suffered A Lethal Blow to Its Freedoms
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
384
para bellum
para bellum
View more…

Forum List

Back
Top