An excerpt from the excellent book, "How Democracies Die"

In this case the Repub are in deeper than the Brexit crowd in UK...

Tories were truly terrible for years before they admitted they were crap and even then half of them went to a party even more extreme... i.e. Tories weren't extreme enough..

They are starting to see how utterly awful they were now. But Tories went through 6 leaders in 8 years... They kept on selling the lie...

It is hard to see how US gets out from under the lie. A massive reform on the media and the way it works would be needed and you are not getting that with the present SC.

So way I see it:
Democrats would need large majority.
Make SC 13 members
Reintroduce the fairness doctrine for media

For social media, if the Social Media company is caught interfering with a there algorithm to a political end or personal view. They are no longer a platform they are a publication and such as will be subject to the liable laws of a newspaper.
Which means every post is considered an opinion backed by the newspaper.
This is a special exemption Social Media platforms have to protect them against liable. EU is looking at this right now with regard to Musk and X. There is a feeling that Musk and his posts are being pushed on his platform. He can do that but he isn't a platform anymore, he is a publication.
Translation, give democrats total and perpetual power. Ignore the will of the people and their right to vote for whomever they wish. How democratic, allow only the "correct" voices to be heard and respected. Now, where have we heard that before?
 

For some context, the authors are speaking of the litmus test used to identify authoritarian leaders.

"The final warning sign is a readiness to curtail the civil liberties of rivals and critics. One thing that separates contemporary autocrats from democratic leaders is their intolerance of criticism, and their readiness to use their power to punish those......in the opposition, media, or civil society..........who criticize them."

Justice Dept. Fires Prosecutors Who Worked on Trump Investigations


The acting attorney general on Monday fired more than a dozen prosecutors who worked on the two criminal investigations into Donald J. Trump for the special counsel Jack Smith, saying they could not be trusted to “faithfully implement” the president’s agenda, a Justice Department spokesman said.

Justice Department veterans called the firings an egregious violation of well-established laws meant to preserve the integrity and professionalism of government agencies.

What made it all the more jarring, current and former officials said, was that such a momentous and aggressive step had been initiated by an obscure acting attorney general, James McHenry, operating on behalf of a president with a stated desire for vengeance, and few advisers with the stature or inclination to restrain him.

Greg Brower, who was a U.S. attorney during the George W. Bush administration, said the move was unheard-of.

“This is unprecedented, given the career status of these people, which makes them not subject to dismissal by the president, and the apparent lack of any cause that the department has been able to articulate,” Mr. Brower said. “And so I suspect we will see them exercise their rights to appeal” to the Merit Systems Protection Board, an independent agency that reviews the claims of dismissed civil service workers and can reinstate them.


A word to trump supporters. I know you know this is wrong. The reason I know is if a Dem prez did it you would rightly be calling this an abuse of power. Because it is.

Are you going to keep allowing trump to get away with things like this without speaking up? How far he goes really is up to you. If you collectively make it known you disapprove he will stop. Or you can do nothing and idly watch this orgy of revenge continue.

Before embarking on another Misinformation spree you need to look at the real required premisses :-

What evidence is there to show that Democracy is a meaningful and useful idea ?
And ,
Has there ever been even a single real Democracy , given that a Deep State has existed since Babylonian times , and always uses supposedly duly elected governments as a shield and cloak for its shadow elites ?

Of course both quoted book authors are Jews and Levitsky is certain WEF given that he is a menber on the Council for Foreign Relations

What a murky tangle of political garbage for Dumbocrats and Gullibles to lap up .
 
Translation, give democrats total and perpetual power. Ignore the will of the people and their right to vote for whomever they wish.
Is it your belief it was the will of the people to pardon the violent J6 criminals? Was it the will of the people to illegally fire 17 IG's? Or reassign members of the DoJ who are seen as disloyal to trump in the hope they will resign?
 
Obviously the entire POT is cowed by fear of trump turning the base on them. Dems are in fear of being targeted in various ways by the power of the now corrupted government.

This is what authoritarian governance looks like and the shift towards it is happening in real time RIGHT NOW. Out in the open.

Your understanding of Government and Politics is less than level zero.
 
The rationale expressed in the firing memo contradicts decades of civil service law, which says employees can be fired only for misconduct or poor performance, not for doing their jobs, said Kristin Alden, a lawyer who specializes in federal employment issues.

“The whole reason we have the Civil Service Reform Act is to get away from the spoils system,” she said.

The firings, reported earlier by Fox News, came just hours after news of a major personnel move made by the Trump team that underscored its intention to quickly remove officials who might contradict its plans. The department’s most senior career official, a well-respected department employee responsible for some of the most sensitive cases, was reassigned to a much less powerful post.

Were that official, Bradley Weinsheimer, to remain as the associate deputy attorney general, he would have handled critical questions about possible recusals — a thorny issue for a department that will soon be run by a number of Mr. Trump’s former lawyers.

 

For some context, the authors are speaking of the litmus test used to identify authoritarian leaders.

"The final warning sign is a readiness to curtail the civil liberties of rivals and critics. One thing that separates contemporary autocrats from democratic leaders is their intolerance of criticism, and their readiness to use their power to punish those......in the opposition, media, or civil society..........who criticize them."

Justice Dept. Fires Prosecutors Who Worked on Trump Investigations


The acting attorney general on Monday fired more than a dozen prosecutors who worked on the two criminal investigations into Donald J. Trump for the special counsel Jack Smith, saying they could not be trusted to “faithfully implement” the president’s agenda, a Justice Department spokesman said.

Justice Department veterans called the firings an egregious violation of well-established laws meant to preserve the integrity and professionalism of government agencies.

What made it all the more jarring, current and former officials said, was that such a momentous and aggressive step had been initiated by an obscure acting attorney general, James McHenry, operating on behalf of a president with a stated desire for vengeance, and few advisers with the stature or inclination to restrain him.

Greg Brower, who was a U.S. attorney during the George W. Bush administration, said the move was unheard-of.

“This is unprecedented, given the career status of these people, which makes them not subject to dismissal by the president, and the apparent lack of any cause that the department has been able to articulate,” Mr. Brower said. “And so I suspect we will see them exercise their rights to appeal” to the Merit Systems Protection Board, an independent agency that reviews the claims of dismissed civil service workers and can reinstate them.


A word to trump supporters. I know you know this is wrong. The reason I know is if a Dem prez did it you would rightly be calling this an abuse of power. Because it is.

Are you going to keep allowing trump to get away with things like this without speaking up? How far he goes really is up to you. If you collectively make it known you disapprove he will stop. Or you can do nothing and idly watch this orgy of revenge continue.

Anyone at any level of our justice system that worked on any of the lawfare against President Trump disqualified themselves from being in the Trump administration.

That is just the simplest of common sense.
 
Nothing happening here is Hitler like or undemocratic. When Trump does something you think he shouldn't do, it has to get past the judges and Senators. So, so far he's not been a dictator at all. He's simply trying to get his agenda implemented.

The only problem I have is will elections be rigged from now on? Because we KNOW Trump isn't above rigging an election. Clearly.

Not clearly.

No one even thinks that - real world.
 
Is it your belief it was the will of the people to pardon the violent J6 criminals? Was it the will of the people to illegally fire 17 IG's? Or reassign members of the DoJ who are seen as disloyal to trump in the hope they will resign?
It was the will of the people that TRUMP! be our next president. I don't know about you, but most people are not slavish enough to completely back each and every inclination a politician has. To us, the only perfect candidate is ourselves. Did you slavishly expect to support every word that came out of Cackles mouth, since you wanted her to defeat TRUMP!? I would hope not, there were a lot of nonsense words that came out of her.

In this case, however, it would behoove you to go back and review what I quoted. That should give you a clue as to about what I was talking.
 
LOL! There's that joy, you are one entertaining S.O.B.

Trolls get so angry when the crowd turns against them .

This one hates it when he doesn't get a response .
He cannot grasp that we have heard this rubbish so many times before from idealistic kids that it frankly is just terribly boring
imho .
 
Do you recognize what trump did in firing Smith's team is wrong?

If you can't bring yourself to admit to what should be obvious can you at least admit trump's pardon of the J6 violent criminals was wrong?
It was absolutely correct. It is what he was elected to do.
 
A word to trump supporters. I know you know this is wrong. The reason I know is if a Dem prez did it you would rightly be calling this an abuse of power. Because it is.
Their minds don't work that way, they are hardwired to obey one side, oppose the other.

That's their range.
 
Are you going to keep allowing trump to get away with things like this without speaking up? How far he goes really is up to you. If you collectively make it known you disapprove he will stop. Or you can do nothing and idly watch this orgy of revenge continue.
Why do you think we disapprove?
 
"The final warning sign is a readiness to curtail the civil liberties of rivals and critics. One thing that separates contemporary autocrats from democratic leaders is their intolerance of criticism, and their readiness to use their power to punish those......in the opposition, media, or civil society..........who criticize them."

We have been shouting this from the fucking mountain tops for 4 years!!! :cuckoo:
 
Not surprisingly, you didn't answer my question.
That's because you ignored the reason for my post and wanted to take it in a completely different direction and on a completely different topic.
 
Do you recognize what trump did in firing Smith's team is wrong?
Not firing them would be wrong. You WILL see lawfare in EVERY administration going foward if there arent consequences for those involved in it.
 
Back
Top Bottom