DOJ: So how long do you give the new guy before you call for his resignation too?

candycorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
123,809
Reaction score
66,243
Points
2,605
Location
Out There and I am Loving It!
Clearly none of Trump’s “hit list” did anything illegal.

But in Magastan this fact doesn’t matter.

The new suit at Justice will have ghe same batting average as Bondi; 0.00 in this regard.

How long do you give her or him?


From the link:

“At the end of the day, it’s not like there were some magic steps that Pam Bondi could have taken to make bad cases look good to grand juries or judges,” Peter Keisler, a former acting attorney general in President George W. Bush’s administration, said in an email. “The problem is that the president is demanding that prosecutions be brought when there’s no evidence and no valid legal theory. A new Attorney General won’t change that.”
 
Trump doesn't understand that, if he doesn't like someone, that doesn't mean they've broken a law.

As usual, he's like a child, a spoiled little boy who lashes out at anyone who tries to hold him accountable.

And these people keep accepting jobs from him, somehow ignoring what they know is coming. It's inexplicable.
 
Clearly none of Trump’s “hit list” did anything illegal.

But in Magastan this fact doesn’t matter.

The new suit at Justice will have ghe same batting average as Bondi; 0.00 in this regard.

How long do you give her or him?


From the link:

“At the end of the day, it’s not like there were some magic steps that Pam Bondi could have taken to make bad cases look good to grand juries or judges,” Peter Keisler, a former acting attorney general in President George W. Bush’s administration, said in an email. “The problem is that the president is demanding that prosecutions be brought when there’s no evidence and no valid legal theory. A new Attorney General won’t change that.”
Night of the long knives – it’s how fascist regimes work.
 
Clearly none of Trump’s “hit list” did anything illegal.

But in Magastan this fact doesn’t matter.

The new suit at Justice will have ghe same batting average as Bondi; 0.00 in this regard.

How long do you give her or him?


From the link:

“At the end of the day, it’s not like there were some magic steps that Pam Bondi could have taken to make bad cases look good to grand juries or judges,” Peter Keisler, a former acting attorney general in President George W. Bush’s administration, said in an email. “The problem is that the president is demanding that prosecutions be brought when there’s no evidence and no valid legal theory. A new Attorney General won’t change that.”
You have to remember something. From many Republican points of view your media/entertainers need to be executed. They know what they are doing with their endless lies. There is a good chance some of them and Prog traitors in government in any way got those aircraft shot down in Iran.
 
Trump doesn't understand that, if he doesn't like someone, that doesn't mean they've broken a law.

As usual, he's like a child, a spoiled little boy who lashes out at anyone who tries to hold him accountable.

And these people keep accepting jobs from him, somehow ignoring what they know is coming. It's inexplicable.
They think the orange retard really, really likes them.
 
They think the orange retard really, really likes them.
Reiner was just an example of no concern to Republicans as we are worn down and of course your psychotics killed your own. You are too busy trying to interfere with all others without looking inside your homes. Renee Good a perfect example that most likely number in the millions.
 
Clearly none of Trump’s “hit list” did anything illegal.

But in Magastan this fact doesn’t matter.

The new suit at Justice will have ghe same batting average as Bondi; 0.00 in this regard.

How long do you give her or him?


From the link:

“At the end of the day, it’s not like there were some magic steps that Pam Bondi could have taken to make bad cases look good to grand juries or judges,” Peter Keisler, a former acting attorney general in President George W. Bush’s administration, said in an email. “The problem is that the president is demanding that prosecutions be brought when there’s no evidence and no valid legal theory. A new Attorney General won’t change that.”
My opinion is to let these big deep blue cities destroy themselves. Trying to save them from themselves is a lost cause. So, let the voters have what they want.
 
Clearly none of Trump’s “hit list” did anything illegal.

But in Magastan this fact doesn’t matter.

The new suit at Justice will have ghe same batting average as Bondi; 0.00 in this regard.

How long do you give her or him?


From the link:

“At the end of the day, it’s not like there were some magic steps that Pam Bondi could have taken to make bad cases look good to grand juries or judges,” Peter Keisler, a former acting attorney general in President George W. Bush’s administration, said in an email. “The problem is that the president is demanding that prosecutions be brought when there’s no evidence and no valid legal theory. A new Attorney General won’t change that.”
Not long
 
Trump doesn't understand that, if he doesn't like someone, that doesn't mean they've broken a law.
Well his mindset is that everyone is as dirty as he is.

And I get it. Like if you're attending a legal conference or a seminar on IT or Investment banking...you assume when you walk into the room that the people you're dealing with have the same education you do. Trump applies that to his cutting of legal corners, his misogyny, his sleaze factor. And frankly, his supporters are pretty sleazy people by and large.

I mean, look at this dope I'm dealing with on this thread.

"My opinion is to let these big deep blue cities destroy themselves. Trying to save them from themselves is a lost cause. So, let the voters have what they want."

I said nothing about blue cities, saving them or voters. But sh!t-brains posts that. When I asked him about it he said something about "we know where you were going". He could have just admitted he responded to the wrong thread but no...he can't bring himself to ever admit a mistake. Its bewildering....but above all else; it's sad.
 
I think we need to focus on the essential, salient point with respect to His Orangeness's initial demand of the blonde sock puppet that she prosecute his enemies. Not the vindictiveness, not the abuse of power, not the corruption.

That the POTUS holds the delusional belief there were crimes to prosecute without any evidence. Just as there is no evidence he won the 2020 election.

Meaning the POTUS is detached from reality. He doesn't see the world as it is. He sees it as he wants it to be.

It is impossible to over state the danger for the country that represents.
 
It is impossible to over state the danger for the country that represents.
Somehow we survived your Dementedness and his unprecedented abuse of the criminal justice system. Pretty sure we can survive the DOJ holding some Democrats to account.
 
15th post
Got to be replaced before the mid-terms are stolen. As Trump gets nothing recess adopts thanks to TurnCoatThune keeping Senate in session even on vacation tapps.

Others got 200 or so recess appts. The fix is in the Deep Stae rooted in Congress. 15 "R" are permanent DEM.
 
Got to be replaced before the mid-terms are stolen. As Trump gets nothing recess adopts thanks to TurnCoatThune keeping Senate in session even on vacation tapps.

Others got 200 or so recess appts. The fix is in the Deep Stae rooted in Congress. 15 "R" are permanent DEM.

I see you're back to speaking in morse code.
 
Got to be replaced before the mid-terms are stolen. As Trump gets nothing recess adopts thanks to TurnCoatThune keeping Senate in session even on vacation tapps.

Others got 200 or so recess appts. The fix is in the Deep Stae rooted in Congress. 15 "R" are permanent DEM.


//I would like to admit mistake here. Obiden 2.0 (the corpse) also had no recess APPT. He and Trump blocked since 2014. Ush Obiden 1.0 had a lot//

President Joe Biden did not make any recess appointments through 2024. This is because the Senate remained in continuous session through pro forma meetings, which occur every few days and prevent the Senate from being in a formal recess lasting 10 or more days—the threshold established by the Supreme Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning (2014).

Biden followed the same practice as Donald Trump, who also made no recess appointments during his presidency despite having Senate majorities at times. The use of pro forma sessions by the Senate has effectively blocked the use of recess appointments since the 2014 ruling, requiring presidents to rely on the standard confirmation process or temporary acting officials under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act
 
Back
Top Bottom