America Is Done Pretending About Meat

As your buddy Carl said, its a public forum. That is what it is for. If you don't want opposing opinions, you know where the ignore button is. I realize typical democrats just want a sounding board. BTW, disparaging people and calling them rude names is the uncivil behavior that you've chose to use--stop projecting.

^ See, here's an example for you, of your nastiness in lieu of actual arguments.

I've told you at least 3 times now that I'm not a Dem. But you're still saying the same thing.

.... while trying to turn the tables and claim I'm being uncivil. Total projection.

If you can't be cool, then I'm done with you.

Now I hope I don't see 5 more notifications from you, like I did a little while ago when I got here after being gone most of the day.
 
I've told you at least 3 times now that I'm not a Dem. But you're still saying the same thing.
So democrat is nasty language? So much worse than the terms you use. Here's one that is appropriate and true when describing you--HYPOCRITE. If you're looking for a sounding board for your choice of diet, you're barking up the wrong tree, missy.
 
Plant based foods were just another food fad.

There used to be a vegan-friendly all organic health food restaurant near me. I think it was called The Good Earth or something like that. I went there every chance I had when I was in the area. I really liked the food. I think they baked their own whole grain natural bread and stuff used for sandwiches, etc.

A few years ago I went by and looked for the place. Yep, you guess it: Out of business. Boarded up. Gone.
 
So democrat is nasty language? So much worse than the terms you use. Here's one that is appropriate and true when describing you--HYPOCRITE. If you're looking for a sounding board for your choice of diet, you're barking up the wrong tree, missy.

No, it's not about the language. It's about continuing to say something false on purpose after I already told you 3 times that it's false. Why? My guess is because you hate vegans....and instead of presenting actual arguments, all you can do is make it personal.

And that's just one thing. Now you're still going, still trying to make it personal, still misportraying my intent, instead of debating the actual topic.

But you know what? At this point, I don't even want to argue with you. So I'll let Carl deal with you. You can post to him, and most likely he'll reply. Again, hopefully I won't see more notifications from you.
 
If your God didn't intend for them to be eaten he wouldn't have made them taste so good.

Put another way, nature generally makes stuff edible appealing in taste to us.

So why would he make cows so tasty to us if he didn't intend for us to eat them?

After all, 30,000 years ago, there were bison and mammoths and mastodons to munch on, but last I checked, there were no big supermarkets full of mung bean sprouts.
 
Put another way, nature generally makes stuff edible appealing in taste to us.

So why would he make cows so tasty to us if he didn't intend for us to eat them?

After all, 30,000 years ago, there were bison and mammoths and mastodons to munch on, but last I checked, there were no big supermarkets full of mung bean sprouts.

It has been said that human flesh tastes like pork. So....if that's true, that pretty much defeats the idea that animal flesh is supposed to be eaten. haha

Besides... I think MOST people season the flesh they eat... with plantbased seasonings.
 
I see a primate. Mankind is a primate. Take a look at a chimpanzee. We share about 97-98% genetic material. Their teeth look an awful lot like mine. And guess what, they're omnivores too.

The point being that many of these animals have fangs not for hunting and eating but for defense and fighting. Mankind gave those up (like he gave up a woolly coat of hair even though he still needed to keep warm) in lieu of his tool-making weapon-making skills.

Kinda hard to catch a Mastodon by going up and biting it.

https://as1.ftcdn.net/v2/jpg/06/28/71/80/1000_F_628718036_Y8PfhNPu4SZoOSXxfxKx4zyuvM7fiNzz.jpg
 
It has been said that human flesh tastes like pork.
I suppose, but I wouldn't know. I never cared for pork.

So....if that's true, that pretty much defeats the idea that animal flesh is supposed to be eaten. haha
Actually no. All that proves is that humans were food early on for /other/ creatures who LIKED the taste of pork!
 
No, it's not about the language. It's about continuing to say something false on purpose after I already told you 3 times that it's false.
Like you tried to redefine the term "murder" to meet your narrative in spite of the fact that murder has never been used to describe the killing of an animal for meat? BTW, you are not the authority on what is false and what is not. It is that type of arrogance that makes people like those that oppose your views on this thread continue to call you out.
My guess is because you hate vegans....and instead of presenting actual arguments, all you can do is make it personal.
Again, please link to where I have said anything more than "you are more than welcome to eat anything you want." You are the one that continues to attempt to convince the meat-eaters on this thread that they are wrong. That, my dear, is arrogance. I think you somehow think you have the inside line to truth because you choose a vegan lifestyle. You are the one spewing hatred simply because of the diet I choose.
 
I suppose, but I wouldn't know. I never cared for pork.

Actually no. All that proves is that humans were food early on for /other/ creatures who LIKED the taste of pork!

Well... I know that this is probably not what you or anyone wants to hear... but since you brought up that scenario... the way I see it is, if we wouldn't want to be prey for some other creature, then we shouldn't prey upon those who are at our mercy.

That reminds me of a quote, by Pierre Troubetzkoy:

"Why should man expect his prayer for mercy to be heard by What is above him when he shows no mercy to what is under him?"
 
It's about continuing to say something false on purpose
Please link to anything that I said that was false. Be specific and justify your assertion with an authoritative citation. Not simply because you were persuaded many years ago to eschew meat.
 
Well... I know that this is probably not what you or anyone wants to hear...
It is not a matter of my wanting to hear anything. I'm like Sargent Joe Friday, I'm just after the facts, Mam.

if we wouldn't want to be prey for some other creature, then we shouldn't prey upon those who are at our mercy.
I don't think nature is that simple. We can still prey on other creatures (all those creatures the God in the Bible gave us dominion over!) even if we don't want preyed on ourselves!

Being at the top of the food chain and being dominant over all other creatures has fringe benefits. But I understand your idealism in wishing for a perfect world where all live in perfect harmony.
 
Please link to anything that I said that was false. Be specific and justify your assertion with an authoritative citation. Not simply because you were persuaded many years ago to eschew meat.

4 more notifications from you! 😮

Wow. Right after I told you clearly, at least 3 times, that I don't want to keep talking to you.

That is yet another example of your nastiness, you have no respect that no means no.

But I will answer one thing you said:

Please link to anything that I said that was false.

^ I was specifically talking about how you kept falsely saying I'm a Democrat, when I made it clear to you at least 3 times that I wasn't.

Now, I'm going to say this one last time.

Leave me alone. I have ZERO interest in continuing with you. I'd rather get a root canal.
 
I don't think nature is that simple. We can still prey on other creatures (all those creatures the God in the Bible gave us dominion over!) even if we don't want preyed on ourselves!

Being at the top of the food chain and being dominant over all other creatures has fringe benefits. But I understand your idealism in wishing for a perfect world where all live in perfect harmony.

When God gave us dominion, in the Garden of Eden, in the very next verse He gave us a 100% plantbased diet. The very next verse! :)

So that is just ONE way of knowing that true dominion, in the image of God, didn't mean license to exploit, kill and eat animals.

Dominion in the image of God meant taking care of the animals..... like God's dominion. With love, mercy, peace, respect for their lives and well-being.
 
4 more notifications from you! 😮
That is yet another example of your nastiness, you have no respect that no means no.

To be sure, BC, no one here is trying to be nasty to you. They just find your views challenging, and want to challenge them. That is what discussion boards are for.

Don't want to debate it, probably best not to bring it up.
 
When God gave us dominion, in the Garden of Eden, in the very next verse He gave us a 100% plantbased diet. The very next verse!
Well, to be sure, the Bible is not a literal text. In 1400 BC roughly when someone composed the book Genesis, they did not literally mean the universe took six of our days, they mean six time units of an indeterminate length. At that time, the world did not even have a uniform calendar to go by to even agree on the dates.

That said, does the Bible not say we are given dominion over all creatures on the Earth, and is it not replete with stories of sacrificing lambs, goats and other things? Not that it matters. It is no skin off my nose how or what you eat.

Dominion in the image of God meant taking care of the animals.....
Some would tell you they take care of the deer and other animals by culling their excess, so that those that remain don't starve in the winter.
 
To be sure, BC, no one here is trying to be nasty to you. They just find your views challenging, and want to challenge them. That is what discussion boards are for.

Don't want to debate it, probably best not to bring it up.

I didn't post this thread. Someone else did. I did respond to it though, and that's what stirred up this hornet's nest. :lol:

And I actually have no problem at all debating anyone who wants to debate. Until they continually show that they are incapable of being cool and having an actual discussion.

You and I got into a little spat earlier on this thread... when you got annoyed that I didn't debate you at that time (because it was in the middle of the afternoon and I had IRL stuff to do).... but later you chilled and we were able to have a discussion. Same with a few others on this thread. But not that guy.
 
Back
Top Bottom