Al Sharpton Gets In Physical Confrontation With Fox News Reporter [VIDEO]

[Judicial review]

Sharpton knows that would violate the constitution and never be passed by congress in the next decade with the GOP House gains. Lol. Boy is he starting to stir up shit or what. Let's see how many idiot march with him.

Really because I am pretty sure that the current court would have no issue passing that as constitutional and the republicans never pass up an opportunity to increase government power.

Explain your "case" as to why that's NOT a never before seen unprecedented step of the fed taking over the states power. They Supreme court would never take up the case. My name is Judicial Review for a reason, moron.

I don’t really need to explain to the board idiot why this is the case. If someone with a brain would like to ask then I will get more into it.

Oh, but you already tried, and therefore need to fully commit to your line of reasoning unless you know you are full of shit, then i can understand backing out, but to insult instead of just not posting shows a selfish pride issue of refusing to believe you are wrong when all with a brain know you are.

Keep it up and you'll be the fool of the week or at least in the top 10. Btw.. I know you have an agenda you were trying to stir up, but not while I'm here. Do me a huge favor and keep it up or you can use your brain.

 

[Judicial review]

Al Sharpton will make blacks more conservative (right leaning). Think about that for a wile.

 

[Camp]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

 

[Meathead]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

 

[Judicial review]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

What makes you think a good portion of blacks in America follow al Sharpton. FYI, he's hated by blacks a lot of blacks.

 

[Camp]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

And the fundamentalist evangelical tv preachers who drain the bank accounts of lonely and frightened old ladies to live lives of obscene luxury and wealth or the hate speech industry of the right are somehow not as bad as what you project about the black spokespeople? When you attack a side or group that opposes your agenda in a demonizing way it implies you believe those same demonizing characteristics are absent from your own side or representative groups. Fundamentalist who blamed 9/11 on America for holding different religious beliefs than the tv fundraising evangelical preachers were classified as piece of shit by much of America. America has no shortages of assholes and pieces of shit.

 

[Meathead]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

What makes you think a good portion of blacks in America follow al Sharpton. FYI, he's hated by blacks a lot of blacks.

What makes you think I think a "good portion" of blacks follow him? Regardless, he is a black leader and a reflection of black society, that cannot be disputed.

I don't that many blacks find him repulsive, and yet are loathe to criticize him, in doing so becoming labelled as "Uncle Toms".

 

[Meathead]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

And the fundamentalist evangelical tv preachers who drain the bank accounts of lonely and frightened old ladies to live lives of obscene luxury and wealth or the hate speech industry of the right are somehow not as bad as what you project about the black spokespeople? When you attack a side or group that opposes your agenda in a demonizing way it implies you believe those same demonizing characteristics are absent from your own side or representative groups. Fundamentalist who blamed 9/11 on America for holding different religious beliefs than the tv fundraising evangelical preachers were classified as piece of shit by much of America. America has no shortages of assholes and pieces of shit.

I would not see fit to deflect criticism of such TV preachers in the way you are deflecting it from Reverend Al.

 

[Camp]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

And the fundamentalist evangelical tv preachers who drain the bank accounts of lonely and frightened old ladies to live lives of obscene luxury and wealth or the hate speech industry of the right are somehow not as bad as what you project about the black spokespeople? When you attack a side or group that opposes your agenda in a demonizing way it implies you believe those same demonizing characteristics are absent from your own side or representative groups. Fundamentalist who blamed 9/11 on America for holding different religious beliefs than the tv fundraising evangelical preachers were classified as piece of shit by much of America. America has no shortages of assholes and pieces of shit.

I would not see fit to deflect criticism of such TV preachers in the way you are deflecting it from Reverend Al.

You have Presidential candidates that shamelessly flip flop on issues and make statement that play to their base or factions on regular and routine schedules. Hate speech has become acceptable along with lying. Of course you do not want to use tv evangelical preachers as comparisons to Rev Al. How convenient. Your deflections of using Rev Al as a demon is acceptable deflection, but mentioning white tv fund raising preachers are off the table. Only the black preachers can be spoken badly of. The white ones deserve a pass.

 

[Meathead]

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

And the fundamentalist evangelical tv preachers who drain the bank accounts of lonely and frightened old ladies to live lives of obscene luxury and wealth or the hate speech industry of the right are somehow not as bad as what you project about the black spokespeople? When you attack a side or group that opposes your agenda in a demonizing way it implies you believe those same demonizing characteristics are absent from your own side or representative groups. Fundamentalist who blamed 9/11 on America for holding different religious beliefs than the tv fundraising evangelical preachers were classified as piece of shit by much of America. America has no shortages of assholes and pieces of shit.

I would not see fit to deflect criticism of such TV preachers in the way you are deflecting it from Reverend Al.

You have Presidential candidates that shamelessly flip flop on issues and make statement that play to their base or factions on regular and routine schedules. Hate speech has become acceptable along with lying. Of course you do not want to use tv evangelical preachers as comparisons to Rev Al. How convenient. Your deflections of using Rev Al as a demon is acceptable deflection, but mentioning white tv fund raising preachers are off the table. Only the black preachers can be spoken badly of. The white ones deserve a pass.

What deflection asshole? This thread is about Al Sharpton. If you want to start a thread about Evangelical preachers or conservative radio personalities, then do so instead of coming up with these insipid straw man arguments to defend Sharpton.

You are truly a light weight, we get it.

 

[Camp]

That still doesn't make it your business. People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them. You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead. Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants. The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

And the fundamentalist evangelical tv preachers who drain the bank accounts of lonely and frightened old ladies to live lives of obscene luxury and wealth or the hate speech industry of the right are somehow not as bad as what you project about the black spokespeople? When you attack a side or group that opposes your agenda in a demonizing way it implies you believe those same demonizing characteristics are absent from your own side or representative groups. Fundamentalist who blamed 9/11 on America for holding different religious beliefs than the tv fundraising evangelical preachers were classified as piece of shit by much of America. America has no shortages of assholes and pieces of shit.

I would not see fit to deflect criticism of such TV preachers in the way you are deflecting it from Reverend Al.

You have Presidential candidates that shamelessly flip flop on issues and make statement that play to their base or factions on regular and routine schedules. Hate speech has become acceptable along with lying. Of course you do not want to use tv evangelical preachers as comparisons to Rev Al. How convenient. Your deflections of using Rev Al as a demon is acceptable deflection, but mentioning white tv fund raising preachers are off the table. Only the black preachers can be spoken badly of. The white ones deserve a pass.

What deflection asshole? This thread is about Al Sharpton. If you want to start a thread about Evangelical preachers or conservative radio personalities, then do so instead of coming up with these insipid straw man arguments to defend Sharpton.

You are truly a light weight, we get it.

Not defending Sharpton, castigating posters like you and Steph for racist demonizing.

 

[Meathead]

Black people make terrible, truly terrible, choices in who they follow. Al Sharpton is an unmitigated buffon, grossly inarticulate and corrupted to the core whose only cause is to increase racial tension by vulturism. He is the lowest of the low. Such sleaze surely does not garner his followers any respect and does a disservice to black America which they can ill afford.

And the fundamentalist evangelical tv preachers who drain the bank accounts of lonely and frightened old ladies to live lives of obscene luxury and wealth or the hate speech industry of the right are somehow not as bad as what you project about the black spokespeople? When you attack a side or group that opposes your agenda in a demonizing way it implies you believe those same demonizing characteristics are absent from your own side or representative groups. Fundamentalist who blamed 9/11 on America for holding different religious beliefs than the tv fundraising evangelical preachers were classified as piece of shit by much of America. America has no shortages of assholes and pieces of shit.

I would not see fit to deflect criticism of such TV preachers in the way you are deflecting it from Reverend Al.

You have Presidential candidates that shamelessly flip flop on issues and make statement that play to their base or factions on regular and routine schedules. Hate speech has become acceptable along with lying. Of course you do not want to use tv evangelical preachers as comparisons to Rev Al. How convenient. Your deflections of using Rev Al as a demon is acceptable deflection, but mentioning white tv fund raising preachers are off the table. Only the black preachers can be spoken badly of. The white ones deserve a pass.

What deflection asshole? This thread is about Al Sharpton. If you want to start a thread about Evangelical preachers or conservative radio personalities, then do so instead of coming up with these insipid straw man arguments to defend Sharpton.

You are truly a light weight, we get it.

Not defending Sharpton, castigating posters like you and Steph for racist demonizing.

Bull, you're having a hissyfit while trying to deflect criticism of Sharpton with the idea that anyone who does so is racisr. You're knee-jerking like a self-righteous tennybopper twit, which is no surprise.

 

[Camp]

Nope, I have been referring to him as an asshole, just not doing it with the racist flair you and Steph like to use.

 

[Kondor3]

...Why is that a concern to you? Don't people have a right to invite and select people they want to consult or advise them when they are in a crisis or dealing with a situation?...

This, people, is why the Nation's premier Race Baiters... Jackson and Sharpton... perpetuate their meal-tickets... 'cause such folk keep making excuses for those pieces of shit.

That still doesn't make it your business...

Shit-stirrers are everyone's business.

Especially when they are milking and hoodwinking the poor and disenfranchised, and when they frequently rush to arrive on the scene of a confrontation in order to further inflame a situation or to put a racist spin on a situation before all the facts are in, as those two shameless opportunists have done time and again and again over the decades.

...People can select whatever pieces of shit they want to advise, consult or lead them...

Indeed. And fellow citizens have every right to criticize their choices.

...You have no more right at the selection than they have in selecting the pieces of shit that your political or ideological groups select to advise, consult or lead...

Indeed. And fellow citizens have every right to criticize their choices.

...Black people are not the only group that makes controversial or poor choices of spokespeople and consultants...

Indeed. And fellow citizens have every right to criticize their choices.

...The arrogance of attacking people like Sharpton and Jackson by calling them race baiters and resorting to demonizing and criticizing the messengers to avoid confronting the message is an indication of racism at worst and simple deflection and escape of confronting the issue's at best.

Horseshit.

They are called race-baiters because that is exactly what they are.

Career-level life-long race-baiters, who profit from shit-stirring... Martin Luther King mantle-inheritor wannabes... beings of a much commoner clay than King.

Your opinion to the contrary notwithstanding.

But, as always, thank you for your feedback.

 

[Kondor3]

...What makes you think a good portion of blacks in America follow al Sharpton. FYI, he's hated by blacks a lot of blacks.

Not enough, apparently, to take him off the radar, though.

 

[Stephanie]

Sharpton is like a Vulture swooping in to feed on the destruction and death of a black person, no matter WHO they are. But HE IS PART of the problem. people need to wake up

SNIP:
Baltimore Is a Democrat Problem, Not America’s Problem

The Associated Press
by John Nolte28 Apr 20152383


Contrary to the emotional blackmail some leftists are attempting to peddle, Baltimore is not America’s problem or shame. That failed city is solely and completely a Democrat problem. Like many failed cities, Detroit comes to mind, and every city besieged recently by rioting, Democrats and their union pals have had carte blanche to inflict their ideas and policies on Baltimore since 1967, the last time there was a Republican Mayor.

In 2012, after four years of his own failed policies, President Obama won a whopping 87.4% of the Baltimore City vote. Democrats run the city of Baltimore, the unions, the schools, and, yes, the police force. Since 1969, there have been only two Republican governors of the State of Maryland.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD)

12%


Liberty Score™
Voting Record
F
12%
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD)


has represented Baltimore in the U.S. Congress for more than thirty years. As I write this, despite his objectively disastrous reign, the Democrat-infested mainstream media is treating the Democrat like a local folk hero, not the obvious and glaring failure he really is.


Every single member of the Baltimore city council is a Democrat.


Baltimore Is a Democrat Problem Not America s Problem - Breitbart

 

[Kondor3]

...And the fundamentalist evangelical tv preachers who drain the bank accounts of lonely and frightened old ladies to live lives of obscene luxury and wealth or the hate speech industry of the right are somehow not as bad as what you project about the black spokespeople?...

Nobody said that.

However, the focus of the moment is shit-stirrers like Sharpton and Jackson, not the Fake-White-Men-of-God on TV.

Focus, grasshopper... focus.

 

[mudwhistle]

Well well, look who this woman Mayor is in Cahoots with. Anyone remember VOTING for Sharpton? He seems to be all over the PLACE where there has been riots and lootings...
So you see, you CAN'T ask the mayor any questions. she'll tell you what SHE WANTS and screw the rest of you. VIDEO at the site

SNIP:
Al Sharpton Gets In Physical Confrontation With Fox News Reporter [VIDEO]

Alex Griswold
Media Reporter


Fox News reporter Leland Vittert got into a heated — and eventually physical — confrontation with activist and MSNBC host Al Sharpton, when the latter tried to keep him from questioning Democratic Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake.

“We can’t ask questions?” Vittert challenged her. “You are a public official and we can’t ask questions?”

“You will have the opportunity,” Sharpton said.

“Then you’ll answer our questions?” he pressed.


“At the press conference, we will answer all questions,” Sharpton said. But as Vittert kept tailing them, a second man stepped between the reporter and the mayor and began pushing him away.

all of it here:
Al Sharpton Gets In Confrontation With Fox News Reporter The Daily Caller

The only thing Sharpton assaults us with is his rhetoric. That skinny little runt couldn't get physical if his life depended on it.

From what I understand a bodyguard was the perp, not Sharpton.

 

[Kondor3]

...I would not see fit to deflect criticism of such TV preachers in the way you are deflecting it from Reverend Al.

 

[rightwinger]

So Obama sends in Sharpton to make things worse..

2 Point Violation

Failure to use "far left drone" in post