Al-Qaeda Tells Iran to Stop Spreading 9/11 Lies

[Toro]

... and pwns the conspiracists

Al-Qaeda accuses Iran of 9/11 lie

Al-Qaeda's deputy leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has blamed Iran for spreading the theory that Israel was behind the 11 September 2001 attacks.

In an audio tape posted on the internet, Zawahiri insisted al-Qaeda had carried out the attacks on the US.

He accused Iran, and its Hezbollah allies, of trying to discredit Osama Bin Laden's network.

Correspondents say the comments underline al-Qaeda's increasing public hostility towards Iran.

In a two-hour audiotape posted on an Islamist website, Osama Bin Laden's chief deputy responded to questions posted by al-Qaeda sympathisers.

In response to a question about persistent rumours in the Middle East that Israel was involved in the 9/11 attacks, Zawahiri said the rumour had begun on the Hezbollah television station, Al-Manar.

"The purpose of this lie is clear - [to suggest] that there are no heroes among the Sunnis who can hurt America as no-one else did in history, he said.

"Iranian media snapped up this lie and repeated it." ...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7361414.stm

 

[RetiredGySgt]

... and pwns the conspiracists



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7361414.stm

You realize according to Eots and his buddies WE did 911. So I guess they are both lying?

 

[Toro]

You realize according to Eots and his buddies WE did 911. So I guess they are both lying?

Actually, I think the spin now is that maybe Bush, the neocons, the oil companies and the Joos didn't do this by themselves. They did so through their al-Qaeda surrogates.

Or that al-Qaeda is just lying to enhance their status in the Mid-East.

You know, reasonable conclusions...

 

[Care4all]

I for one, am glad he is discrediting this rumor...

Israel did not commit 9/11.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Actually, I think the spin now is that maybe Bush, the neocons, the oil companies and the Joos didn't do this by themselves. They did so through their al-Qaeda surrogates.

Or that al-Qaeda is just lying to enhance their status in the Mid-East.

You know, reasonable conclusions...

Only reasonable to moonbats.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You realize according to Eots and his buddies WE did 911. So I guess they are both lying?

uh thats obvious to anybody who can think for themsleves and outside the box that it was an inside job pulled off by the CIA.Anybody who thinks otherwise is living in a fairytale land and obviously afraid of the truth. get educated www.911truth.org thats just one of many websites where you can learn the truth.

 

[Toro]

uh thats obvious to anybody who can think for themsleves and outside the box that it was an inside job pulled off by the CIA.Anybody who thinks otherwise is living in a fairytale land and obviously afraid of the truth. get educated www.911truth.org thats just one of many websites where you can learn the truth.

The CIA AND its creation, al-Qaeda, which, according to the conspiracists, doesn't even exist, even though they go and television and tell Iran to F--- off!

 

[Swamp Fox]

uh thats obvious to anybody who can think for themsleves and outside the box that it was an inside job pulled off by the CIA.Anybody who thinks otherwise is living in a fairytale land and obviously afraid of the truth. get educated www.911truth.org thats just one of many websites where you can learn the truth.

Be sure to check out the link to the steering committee. One guy there was a plantiff in an ALCU lawsuit, most of them are sociology professors at various leftist universities. Not exactly the unbiased or knowledgable types.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20061014120445472#steering

 

[LA RAM FAN]

all you got to do is look at the videos to see that explosives brought those towers down.Im sure its been mentioned before but since im new here,I;ll mention it again.never in the history of mankind has a a steel structure fell due to fires.and the comeback to that is always none of those steel structures were hit by a jet either though.Well that holds no water either because back in 93 when they had the bombing,there was a documentary made on the towers and leslie robertson the lead designer said that the towers were designed to take a hit from a jet airliner going at maximun speeds of 600 mph.a few of the designers even mentioned on the tape that it was designed to take hits from MULTIPLE airliners.that there would be a great loss of life but the towers themselves would remain standing.

One of the designers kevin ryan even wrote a report to NIST criticising their report-NIST changed their story everytime someone shreaded it to pieces.after Ryan wrote that piece to NIST,he was fired from his job.Plus witnesses who were there heard EXPLOSIONS going off from BELOW in the basement BEFORE the plane struck above.the media blackout of all these witnesses who said they heard explosions going off is enough proof that the media-which is a tool for the government,is proof enough its a coverup and inside job.many dozens and dozens have testified they heard explosions going off in the towers.they have NOTHING to gain by lying.you have firefighters on tape saying-I know what an explosion sounds like and those were explosions.the evidence from the EXPERTS is overwhelming it was an inside job.Bushs brother and cousin were the head of security in the months leading up to that day.just go to the libray and check out some books on 9/11,you'll see for yourself,the evidence is overwhelming.people who accept the governments version have not down their homework.read those books,do some research.

theres been demolition experts saying those towers could not have fallen down like that unless explosives were used,the designers themselves said the towers should have remained standing,the witnesses story contradicts the governments version.it was an inside job,period end of discussion.

 

[Toro]

theres been demolition experts saying those towers could not have fallen down like that unless explosives were used,the designers themselves said the towers should have remained standing,the witnesses story contradicts the governments version.it was an inside job,period end of discussion.

Demolition experts debunk 9/11 conspiracy theories

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC STUDY 8-06 w clarif as of 9-8-06 .pdf

According to Protec, one of the foremost demolition companies in the world

- There is zero evidence that charges were placed in the building where a demolition would occur
- The building did not fall straight down. The initial failures in the WTC happened high in the buildings, not low as would occur in a demolition.
- Air and debris is what was seen coming out of the building prior to the collapse, not evidence of a charge
- There is no seismic evidence of an explosion. The seismic evidence points to a structural failure.
- Witnesses who heard sounds that may sound like an explosion does not mean an explosion took place
- There is no evidence that any non-conventional explosive was used
- People who handled the steel say that it was not quickly shipped overseas
- It is unlikely WTC7 was blown up with explosives for several reasons, including that the owner does not have the authority to dictate to emergency and fire personnel to destroy a building, the term "pull it" is not used in explosives nomenclature, there was plenty of collateral damage to structurally damage WTC7, demolition experts at the scene said there was no evidence it was a demolition, and no physical evidence has ever been presented proving it was a demolition
- Many steel structures have collapsed due to fire. It is also a flaw of logic to assume that simply because one thing had not happened before means it could not happen

 

[cbi0090]

uh thats obvious to anybody who can think for themsleves and outside the box that it was an inside job pulled off by the CIA.Anybody who thinks otherwise is living in a fairytale land and obviously afraid of the truth. get educated www.911truth.org thats just one of many websites where you can learn the truth.

As a structural engineer, I'm insulted by the "theories" and the so called experts who attest to this being an inside job and an act of controlled demolition. Anyone with any knowledge, even rudimentary, knows this is lunacy.

 

[AllieBaba]

It's a mental illness thing. "The select few know better than the ignorant masses....we know we're being attacked from within...."

 

[LA RAM FAN]

As a structural engineer, I'm insulted by the "theories" and the so called experts who attest to this being an inside job and an act of controlled demolition. Anyone with any knowledge, even rudimentary, knows this is lunacy.

living in denial obviously.

 

[AllieBaba]

As you can see, he has access to "secret" knowledge, and everybody else is just delusional....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Demolition experts debunk 9/11 conspiracy theories

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY 8-06 w clarif as of 9-8-06 .pdf

According to Protec, one of the foremost demolition companies in the world

- There is zero evidence that charges were placed in the building where a demolition would occur
- The building did not fall straight down. The initial failures in the WTC happened high in the buildings, not low as would occur in a demolition.
- Air and debris is what was seen coming out of the building prior to the collapse, not evidence of a charge
- There is no seismic evidence of an explosion. The seismic evidence points to a structural failure.
- Witnesses who heard sounds that may sound like an explosion does not mean an explosion took place
- There is no evidence that any non-conventional explosive was used
- People who handled the steel say that it was not quickly shipped overseas
- It is unlikely WTC7 was blown up with explosives for several reasons, including that the owner does not have the authority to dictate to emergency and fire personnel to destroy a building, the term "pull it" is not used in explosives nomenclature, there was plenty of collateral damage to structurally damage WTC7, demolition experts at the scene said there was no evidence it was a demolition, and no physical evidence has ever been presented proving it was a demolition
- Many steel structures have collapsed due to fire. It is also a flaw of logic to assume that simply because one thing had not happened before means it could not happen

the witnesses who were there counter all these lies that explosives were not placed.some say they felt the street below shake BEFORE the first plane hit the tower and there are people that have backed up the willie rodriguez story that he heard an explosion in the basement below about 5 or 10 seconds before the plane struck above.that he rescued a worker from the elevater shaft who was on fire from the basement.the willie rodriguez story CANT be debunked.these people got NOTHING to gain by lying.

here get educated,the evidence here in these videos is overwhelming that explosives were planted and it was an inside job.never too late to admit you have been proven wrong-which all these videos do.

http://canadawantsthetruth911videos.blogspot.com

watch these videos and get educated.

 

[Toro]

these people got NOTHING to gain by lying.

Nobody said they were "lying." Do you not understand the difference between "lying" and "confused?"

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Nobody said they were "lying." Do you not understand the difference between "lying" and "confused?"

well anyways the willie rodriguez story is the smoking gun that cant be debunked that bombs went off.not only are there witnesses to corroborate his story that they heard explosions going off below in the basement about 10 seconds before the plane struck above,and that he pulled a man burning on fire from the elevaters yelling-theres explosions going off in the basement,the videos ALSO show him pulling him the man to safetly out of the tower as well,not to mention firefighters have said-I know the difference between an explosion in a collapse of a building and what an explosion sounds like,those were explosions.so its not even an issue that explosions went off in the towers.thats been proven.