Guy, I posted dozens of scientific papers showing it was a zoonotic transfer from a wet market.
You have a whacky conspiracy theory with no facts, but you love it because you think it exonerates Trump for his mismanagement of the crisis. (It doesn't. No matter where it came from, he still fucked it all up.)
Genetic testing on samples collected during the earliest days of the covid-19 outbreak suggests it is likely that the virus spread from animals to humans at the Huanan seafood market
In June, the World Health Organization recommended that scientists continue to research all possible origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, including a lab leak. Two newly published studies take totally different approaches but arrive at the same conclusion: The Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China...
The claim Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory dates from early in the pandemic. Here's what we know.
www.bbc.com
The problem with conspiracy theories is no matter how many times you prove it was a weather balloon, there will still be people who will insist that it was a flying saucer.
and we can post just as many scientific reports stating it was a gain of function virus originating from a lab ! you sure are vehement in your defense of the CCP! just how much do you have invested in companies profiting from chicom slave labor ?
Actually, common sense dictates it was an animal source. That's where these viruses come from.
Now, if it was a lab leak, why was the first outbreak near the wet market (where all the animals were) instead of the lab (where the supposed viruses were being kept?)
It would strike me that if it was a lab leak, then the workers and neighbors of the lab would be the people first affected.
I keep telling you -- the mental health professionals who saw him failed in their duty. You refuse to hold them responsible.
The background system worked as designed. If the people who saw him for his mental issues had reported their concerns, the background check would have denied him.
"Is James Holmes a Patient of yours?"
"Yes!"
"Would you consider him a good candidate to own a military-grade semi-automatic weapon and a 100 round magazine?"
"Oh, hell no!"
See, no need to look at health records.
As far as criminal records are concerned, private corporations can do that every time they do a background check for employment. They also make you piss in a cup, talk to a few of your coworkers and former bosses, and run a credit background check.
as for your big pharma comparison .. there's no evidence that guns are addictive and cause painful withdrawal symptoms if you don't go to the shooting range every day ..
No. I was in the Army for 11 years (about half of that reserve component), but I never owned a civilian gun. I considered buying one, but my wife doesn't want one in the house.
Why not? Most of the people getting on those international flights were non-Chinese citizens, it wasn't like they had a legal grounds to hold them.
This is why Trump's travel ban was such an epic fail. He restricted non-infected Chinese from entering the country, but he waived American citizens right on in with no quarantine.
"Is James Holmes a Patient of yours?"
"Yes!"
"Would you consider him a good candidate to own a military-grade semi-automatic weapon and a 100 round magazine?"
"Oh, hell no!"
As far as criminal records are concerned, private corporations can do that every time they do a background check for employment. They also make you piss in a cup, talk to a few of your coworkers and former bosses, and run a credit background check.
I'm sure you can find a work-around that doesn't violate HIPAA. I am amused that you are suddenly all for laws that protect your fetish, and not ones that protect a woman's right to choose, or due process for immigrants.
I'm sure you can find a work-around that doesn't violate HIPAA. I am amused that you are suddenly all for laws that protect your fetish, and not ones that protect a woman's right to choose, or due process for immigrants.
PROXIMAL ORIGIN PUBLICATION: “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated in nature.
As I have stated previously using the analogy of a zoo. If anyone were to visit a zoo, and a zookeeper left the gate open to the chimp housing, and the chimps escaped and went on a rampage, killing and harming people, the civil and criminal suits would close the zoo down, and rightfully so as the zoo is culpable for damages.
THe last 4 years has been a distraction, primarily at the hands of Fauci, politicians and the MSM to distract the entire world from focusing on the one question "what is the true origin"? With that answer, we have then have culpability, but not at a regional level, a global level. And who were all the parties involved in this financing of Gain of Research?
So what is next, civil payouts on the global level? When is the first law suit hitting Fauci, the Lab, or those in charge?
If that is "straight", you live in a strange world.
The virus that nobody has managed to isolate was released. I don't believe much of anything the government says, so I don't know by whom it was released, but I have my suspicions.
If that is "straight", you live in a strange world.
The virus that nobody has managed to isolate was released. I don't believe much of anything the government says, so I don't know by whom it was released, but I have my suspicions.
By all means it's plausible, and no doubt they were players in the plandemic. We citizens can only speculate about exact details, who did what to whom.