Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Baldwin was, personally, negligent.Baldwin may have responsibility as far as being one of the producers.
Why wasn’t Massie charged in the Brandon Lee shooting?Baldwin was, personally, negligent.
As the shooter, he is the person most responsible.
Under NM law, he can be charged for involuntary manslaughter
He won't be, though. He hasn't been yet. What, and kill New Mexico's movie industry income?? Not going to happen.As the shooter, he is the person most responsible.
Under NM law, he can be charged for involuntary manslaughter
Oh look - a whataboutism.Why wasn’t Massie charged in the Brandon Lee shooting?
Baldwin may have responsibility as far as being one of the producers.
Beyond that … it’s on the prop people and the armorer
I asked you a question you can’t answer.Oh look - a whataboutism.
I accept your concession.
I already said that he may be culpable AS A PRODUCER. IdiotLike I said, you people have convinced yourselves that a rich white guy who points a gun at an innocent woman, pulls the trigger, and kills her didn't do anything wrong, because he's a DemoKKKrat.
Tell me you'd say the same thing if it was Eric Trump...
You'll have to excsue Lesh - she cannot help but defend another batshit crazy leftist.Like I said, you people have convinced yourselves that a rich white guy who points a gun at an innocent woman, pulls the trigger, and kills her didn't do anything wrong, because he's a DemoKKKrat.
I didn't follow that event closely, but one thing I've been thinking is that every big project has deaths --- big construction project always have more than one death. Even movies have deaths. I think people with their eye on the big picture realize that. They aren't going to charge the star ---- I wonder if they'll even charge the armourer.Why wasn’t Massie charged in the Brandon Lee shooting?
You asked a question because you know you cannot meaningfully address what I said, and want to change the subject.I asked you a question you can’t answer.
There is no way to “address” a future event without citing a past similar event as example.You asked a question because you know you you cannot meaningfully address what I said, and want to change the subject.
Fact remains:
Baldwin was, personally, negligent.
As the shooter, he is the person most responsible.
Under NM law, he can be charged for involuntary manslaughter
And, according to the SAG:
View attachment 556633
Let us know when you csn muster up a meaningful response.
She -identifies- as a man.That makes your whoring for Baldwin even weirder.
How is noting that as a producer, Baldwin may be held liable for this “whoring”?That makes your whoring for Baldwin even weirder.
I do. Okay, Lesh is a male, Lesh is a male. I hate when male posters pretend to be women ----- how is that better than being a trannie? Same thing, really. Fraudulent.No one cares how you choose to identify.
Good thing I didn't ask you to do so.There is no way to “address” a future even
Personal experience?I do. Okay, Lesh is a male, Lesh is a male. I hate when male posters pretend to be women ----- how is that better than being a trannie? Same thing, really. Fraudulent.
So Lesh isn't doing that, and despite the slightly ambiguous netname, is a male.