Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 46,826
- 20,376
- 2,173
It was a mistake by Harris.Teamsters President spoke at the RNC. Harris told him to go fuck himself.
Doesn’t change the fact that Trump is bad for unions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a mistake by Harris.Teamsters President spoke at the RNC. Harris told him to go fuck himself.
LOL The President of the Teamsters spoke at the RNC at Trump's request. Kamala only had millionaires, billionaires and her corporate masters at her coronation.
He threatens them to prevent them from unionizing.For joining a union? uP YOU GAME mAR.
Fake News!He threatens them to prevent them from unionizing.
Courts say otherwise.Fake News!
Working conditions matter.
Pretending like Republicans like unions is total gaslighting.
They blame “greedy” union workers for destroying US manufacturing.
Don't they realize Trump is against unions? Look how he refused to back them last year when Biden did. And listen to him and Elon talk about breaking the law and firing workers who go on strike.
IF this is true, vergognia. They are blue collar deplorables.
Your hatred of union workers is shining through.What, they aren't getting 100% Columbian coffee in their K Cup machines?
Unreasonable union demands are one of the things impacting American manufacturing.
Your hatred of union workers is shining through.
You trivialize and denigrate union demands.My disagreement is mostly with public sector unions, and any State laws that make unions mandatory or create closed shops.
The problem is Unions have gotten most of the things the workers wanted, now their main use is excessive demands and protecting the least productive members of a given trade or work type.
You trivialize and denigrate union demands.
Trump’s support of manufacturing is a worthy policy discussion. It would cost American families more to pay for goods, but support domestic workforce. However, the opposition to unions would mean the benefits of that policy would flow to the capitalists, not the workers. In essence, it’s a policy of wealth transfer from poor and middle class to the wealthy.
You make up demands and then mock the union for your fabrications.I mock demands that deserve mockery.
It's not opposition to unions, it's opposition to idiotic union demands.
Like the whole living wage idiocy, trying to pay someone more than the value they add to a given product or service.
You make up demands and then mock the union for your fabrications.
There’s no explanation other than you hate unions.
Every post you show it more and more.
Your position is based on hate, not substance.I state my position clearly, it's not hate. It's criticism of the straying from the original concept of what Unions are supposed to be.
And public sector unions are the worst.
Your position is based on hate, not substance.
You made up your mind first, then sought a reason to justify it.
I don’t get to have an opinion?You don't get to decide that, mouthbreather.
More useless bullshit from one of the more useless posters on this board.
I don’t get to have an opinion?
Who the fuck do you think you are?
These are people who actually vote, but the way. Not 14 year old Taylor Swift fans.
View attachment 1017768
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, a labor union comprising around 1.3 million members, declared last week that it would not support Harris or Trump in the presidential election. It marked the first time the union has failed to make an endorsement since 1996, and the first time it has not backed a Democratic presidential candidate since 2000.
Only an hour before the endorsement decision was announced, the union released results from their national poll, conducted between July 24 and September 15, in which 59.6 percent of members voted for the union to endorse Trump, versus only 34 percent for Harris.
Despite this, the union said that after reviewing member polling, and a year of rank-and-file interviews with all major presidential candidates, it said: "The union was left with few commitments on top Teamsters issues from either former President Donald Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris—and found no definitive support among members for either party's nominee.
"The union's extensive member polling showed no majority support for Vice President Harris and no universal support among the membership for President Trump," a statement by the union read.
So I do get to decide that.Who's stopping you from having an opinion?
Calling out is not stopping, tard.