Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warnin

[excalibur]

No one should take an mRNA vaccine. This is just another proof of that.

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning​

​

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. ​

​

Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. ​

​

​

Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.​

​

We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.​

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

 

[excalibur]

And this.

Press California

When fake news isn't enough.

presscalifornia.com

 

[candycorn]

No one should take an mRNA vaccine. This is just another proof of that.

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning​

​

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. ​

​

Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. ​

​

​

Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.​

​

We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.​

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

First they say they are using the PLUS cardiac test....

The rest of the ahem..."scholarly" work refers to it as the PULS (not PLUS) test.

Do scholarly journals routinely misspell the name of their own test?

 

[airplanemechanic]

And candycorn laughs at an article from the American Heart Association showing concern over the vaccine. And come to find out he's laughing because he thinks they mispelled PULS. He's so fucking stupid he makes a doorknob look like Einstein.

 

[airplanemechanic]

View attachment 566676

First they say they are using the PLUS cardiac test....

The rest of the ahem..."scholarly" work refers to it as the PULS (not PLUS) test.

Do scholarly journals routinely misspell the name of their own test?

Do you routinely make yourself out to look this fucking stupid?

You fucking idiot. IT IS A PULS CARDIAC TEST.

PULS (Protein Unstable Lesion Signature Test) Cardiac Test™ – LifeLabs

www.lifelabs.com

Just leave you stupid dumbfuck. We're so far over your fucking head you couldn't spot us with a telescope.

 

[excalibur]

You fucking idiot. IT IS A PULS CARDIAC TEST.

PULS (Protein Unstable Lesion Signature Test) Cardiac Test™ – LifeLabs

www.lifelabs.com

Just leave you stupid dumbfuck. We're so far over your fucking head you couldn't spot us with a telescope.

He's concerned about a spell check error.

 

[airplanemechanic]

He's concerned about a spell check error.

ITS NOT AN ERROR. THAT IS THE FUCKING TEST. He's just so fucking stupid he pretends to know shit about this and rather than google it first before speaking, he clicks "laugh" at the post and then proceeds to embarrass the living breathing shit out of himself with his reply making US laugh at HIM.

But it's ok, it was entertaining! LOL

 

[excalibur]

ITS NOT AN ERROR. THAT IS THE FUCKING TEST. He's just so fucking stupid he pretends to know shit about this and rather than google it first before speaking, he clicks "laugh" at the post and then proceeds to embarrass the living breathing shit out of himself with his reply.

But it's ok, it was entertaining! LOL

The first sentence in the Abstract:

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test ...

A spell check error as it is the PULS Cardiac Test.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The first sentence in the Abstract:




A spell check error as it is the PULS Cardiac Test.

He's so fucking stupid. He really does make himself look like an idiot. Spell check would FIX PULS to PLUS. So its actually NOT a spellcheck error. PULS is not a word so the writer of this article had to manually fight spellcheck and have it NOT autofix words like that. So he tries to disqualify the AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION because two letters in a non-word in an article are switched.

Wow, like I said, fucking stupid.

 

[meaner gene]

And this.

Press California

When fake news isn't enough.

presscalifornia.com

The packaged vials for the new formulation are stored frozen at -90°C to – 60°C. The frozen vials may be thawed and stored at refrigerator at 2°C to 8°C for up to 10 weeks.

The new formula is much ,more stable at common storage temperatures (regular residential refrigerator/freezer)

 

[meaner gene]

And candycorn laughs at an article from the American Heart Association showing concern over the vaccine. And come to find out he's laughing because he thinks they mispelled PULS. He's so fucking stupid he makes a doorknob look like Einstein.

He does have a valid point. Scholarly articles are normally checked several times for accuracy, which would include getting the name of the test right. Strange how nobody noticed it, unless it was never subject to peer review.

 

[meaner gene]

Do you routinely make yourself out to look this fucking stupid?

You fucking idiot. IT IS A PULS CARDIAC TEST.

PULS (Protein Unstable Lesion Signature Test) Cardiac Test™ – LifeLabs

www.lifelabs.com

Just leave you stupid dumbfuck. We're so far over your fucking head you couldn't spot us with a telescope.

Yet the article called it a PLUS test.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yet the article called it a PLUS test.

One time. In an article with a TON of details, two letters are switched by a heart surgeon of 40 years who wrote the article. The article just got posted, if he fixes those two letters tomorrow, will dumbass candyass give it credit then?

Steven Gundry is a former cardiac surgeon and a NYT best selling author. Let's compare his credentials to candyass's. Let's see, he's only performed 10,000 heart surgeries in a 40 year span. Yea, candyass's "laugh" emoticon certainly cancels out 40 years of heart surgery.

Steven Gundry, MD

www.ifm.org

 

[meaner gene]

One time. In an article with a TON of details, two letters are switched. The article just got posted, if he fixes those two letters tomorrow, will dumbass candyass give it credit then?

You have to realize the PULS test is also a measure of immune responce (T-cell) activity. Someone given a vaccine that activates T-cells and B-cells would be expected to have elevated T-cell activity. The PULS test presumes that T-cell activity is due to a reaction to repair of early cardiac damage.

 

[White 6]

No one should take an mRNA vaccine. This is just another proof of that.

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning​

​

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. ​

​

Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. ​

​

​

Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.​

​

We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.​

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Read your submission and went to the site to read the whole thing. Was confused on whether they were saying the changes were permanent or just during a couple of months after the dose. A lot I do not understand, as am not a heart doctor. I went to the abstract itself dated submisssion 11/8 and looked at the footnotes to see the author disclosure information at the American Heart Association website. It did not clear up much. Then, I did a Search of the American Heart Association for whether they are recommending for or against Mrna vaccines and used a 1 week search result time frame. At this time they are still recommending, 3rd dose, even for patients that have had heart transplants. Furthermore standing by their "recommend that all adults and children ages 12 and older in the U.S. receive a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as they can."
My impression is papers can be submitted to the American Heart Association, but one paper submission does not necessarily change the recommendation of that organization. I guess it is part of the peer review process. Again, I'm no doctor, but this does not sound like a breaking news red alert from the AHA and they have not changed their position, since August of this year, when the recommended.

American Heart Association: 3rd COVID-19 vaccine dose recommended for heart transplant patients, others with weakened immune systems

On Friday, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended a third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine for people with moderately to severely compromised immune systems, including those who have had a heart, stem cell or other organ transplant and are on...

www.wnypapers.com

I am still planning to get the 3rd dose in early December, mostly based on my limited reaction to the the first two, back in March and April. I suggest everybody do their own research and read the recommendations of organizations, not just the abstracts of what is submitted to them for review.

 

[meaner gene]

Read your submission and went to the site to read the whole thing. Was confused on whether they were saying the changes were permanent or just during a couple of months after the dose. A lot I do not understand, as am not a heart doctor. I went to the abstract itself dated submisssion 11/8 and looked at the footnotes to see the author disclosure information at the American Heart Association website. It did not clear up much.

I went to a PULS website to see what the test, actually a series of 5 tests, were looking for in order to come up with the PULS score. And one was the IL-16, which is "MEASURES IMMUNE FORMATION"

I'm no doctor either, but I would assume that someone getting a vaccine would present heightened immune formation.

 

[meaner gene]

No one should take an mRNA vaccine. This is just another proof of that.

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. ​

Several different cell types coordinate their efforts as part of the immune system, including B cells, T cells, macrophages, mast cells, neutrophils, basophils and eosinophils. Each of these cell types has a distinct role in the immune system, and communicates with other immune cells using secreted cytokines.

cytokines to stimulate specific antigen dependent responses by B and T cells and non-specific responses by other cell types. T cells secrete a variety of factors to coordinate and stimulate immune responses to specific antigen, such as the role of helper T cells in B cell activation in response to antigen.

Cytokines, Inflammation and Pain

Cytokines are small secreted proteins released by cells have a specific effect on the interactions and communications between cells. Cytokine is a general name; other names include lymphokine (cytokines made by lymphocytes), monokine (cytokines made by ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[candycorn]

One time. In an article with a TON of details, two letters are switched by a heart surgeon of 40 years who wrote the article. The article just got posted, if he fixes those two letters tomorrow, will dumbass candyass give it credit then?

Steven Gundry is a former cardiac surgeon and a NYT best selling author. Let's compare his credentials to candyass's. Let's see, he's only performed 10,000 heart surgeries in a 40 year span. Yea, candyass's "laugh" emoticon certainly cancels out 40 years of heart surgery.

Steven Gundry, MD

www.ifm.org

Awwww... Did I make you angry?

The vaccine is safe, effective, free, and available. Anyone not taking it is a category five idiot.

 

[badger2]

And this.

Press California

When fake news isn't enough.

presscalifornia.com

On Skye’s Pfizer thread, we’ve made the thrombosis connection to cerebral palsy and the anti-freeze in the vaccine, all the way back to the fetus. We’re also analyzing the breast cancer connection on that thread, because it links to the P.1 variant (Gamma) of SARS-CoV-2, which in turn we choose to compare with yak coronavirus and a porcine coronavirus found in Canada in 1962.

 

[badger2]

But mutations in IL-16 of the OP link increased risk of lupus (SLE) and by default, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.