johngaltshrugged
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2020
- 6,714
- 15,352
- 2,288
From Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse comes the most plausible explanation for what is really going on here IMO.
Just a few days after French ex-President Francois Hollande gets pantsed by Russian pranksters posing as ex-President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, this whole "leak" comes out from the NYT, the mouthpiece of the intelligence community.
Hollande admits this proxy war against Russia has been the plan since the Obama admin orchestrated the EuroMaiden psyop & pulled a color revolution in Ukraine.
Many of us already knew this but the DC cabal & MSM Pravda can't have this widely known by everyone, it destroys their narrative & credibility.
The story surfaces in the New York Times, indicating a U.S. domestic intelligence interest; and the story is sourced directly to the White House via “senior Biden administration officials.” What does that mean? It means the narrative that flows from the story has a direction to shape opinion from the perspective of U.S. government domestic public relations. It means the narrative is intended to sway a domestic audience with a motive toward something else.
Secondly, and in full alignment with the first point, the centerpiece of the story is focused on a leak that surfaces in “social media.”
This fits perfectly with the domestic intelligence stakeholders (DHS, National Security Council, etc). We know domestic intelligence operates in the backbone of social media platforms. An example is DHS and domestic Intelligence Community (IC) work as outlined in the Twitter files.
Put them together, a domestic IC product surfaced (being called leaked) into social media platforms containing portals controlled by domestic IC.
The domestic IC then report on the leaks to the outlet used by the domestic IC. See how these fit?
The admission by Hollande aligns with every element of the U.S. effort to use Russia as a bad guy, including the use of Russia against Donald J Trump. A proxy war against Russia was in the works going all the way back to the Euromaidan efforts, the color revolution in Ukraine, as constructed by the U.S. State Department, and facilitated by U.S. allies in Europe.
This is the most explosive dose of geopolitical sunlight in years, and obviously these statements by Hollande were a serious issue for the White House and U.S. Intelligence Community. Hollande was tricked by two Russian pranksters into spilling the real story about Ukraine and U.S. involvement therein.
Now do you see the need? The Hollande admission is an urgent problem.
Less than one news cycle later, the IC has dropped the Ukraine counteroffensive strategy in the platforms the IC has access to (a purposeful leak). Then the IC tells the story of the classified strategy leak to the New York Times and begins framing a Russian mis/disinformation campaign. The intent is to mitigate any issues with the Hollande story, fall under the same claims of Russian mis/disinformation.
The leak of classified intelligence, and the attribution to Russian misinformation, is like a brushback pitch toward the heads of the media on the explosive Francois Hollande story. It worked. Have you seen the admissions by Francois Hollande in any MSM? Unified UniParty interests at play.
That’s how the control agents operate. Deflection and adverse information removal is what IC narrative engineering is intended to control. This was a successful IC operation.
theconservativetreehouse.com
Just a few days after French ex-President Francois Hollande gets pantsed by Russian pranksters posing as ex-President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, this whole "leak" comes out from the NYT, the mouthpiece of the intelligence community.
Hollande admits this proxy war against Russia has been the plan since the Obama admin orchestrated the EuroMaiden psyop & pulled a color revolution in Ukraine.
Many of us already knew this but the DC cabal & MSM Pravda can't have this widely known by everyone, it destroys their narrative & credibility.
The story surfaces in the New York Times, indicating a U.S. domestic intelligence interest; and the story is sourced directly to the White House via “senior Biden administration officials.” What does that mean? It means the narrative that flows from the story has a direction to shape opinion from the perspective of U.S. government domestic public relations. It means the narrative is intended to sway a domestic audience with a motive toward something else.
Secondly, and in full alignment with the first point, the centerpiece of the story is focused on a leak that surfaces in “social media.”
This fits perfectly with the domestic intelligence stakeholders (DHS, National Security Council, etc). We know domestic intelligence operates in the backbone of social media platforms. An example is DHS and domestic Intelligence Community (IC) work as outlined in the Twitter files.
Put them together, a domestic IC product surfaced (being called leaked) into social media platforms containing portals controlled by domestic IC.
The domestic IC then report on the leaks to the outlet used by the domestic IC. See how these fit?
The admission by Hollande aligns with every element of the U.S. effort to use Russia as a bad guy, including the use of Russia against Donald J Trump. A proxy war against Russia was in the works going all the way back to the Euromaidan efforts, the color revolution in Ukraine, as constructed by the U.S. State Department, and facilitated by U.S. allies in Europe.
This is the most explosive dose of geopolitical sunlight in years, and obviously these statements by Hollande were a serious issue for the White House and U.S. Intelligence Community. Hollande was tricked by two Russian pranksters into spilling the real story about Ukraine and U.S. involvement therein.
Now do you see the need? The Hollande admission is an urgent problem.
Less than one news cycle later, the IC has dropped the Ukraine counteroffensive strategy in the platforms the IC has access to (a purposeful leak). Then the IC tells the story of the classified strategy leak to the New York Times and begins framing a Russian mis/disinformation campaign. The intent is to mitigate any issues with the Hollande story, fall under the same claims of Russian mis/disinformation.
The leak of classified intelligence, and the attribution to Russian misinformation, is like a brushback pitch toward the heads of the media on the explosive Francois Hollande story. It worked. Have you seen the admissions by Francois Hollande in any MSM? Unified UniParty interests at play.
That’s how the control agents operate. Deflection and adverse information removal is what IC narrative engineering is intended to control. This was a successful IC operation.
About that New York Times Story Concerning the "Online Leak" of U.S. Ukraine and Geopolitical Plans - The Last Refuge
the narrative that flows from the story has a direction to shape opinion from the perspective of U.S. government domestic public relations.
theconservativetreehouse.com
