Abortion

A seed isn't life. It's a seed.

You seem to be equating a human life to a cow or deer, right? Do you think they are equal? I don't. Do you think it is wrong to end all life no matter what? That would certainly be the highest standard. But we will have to eat plants which are living. So we are still going to kill something. If we look at nature we see animals eating other animals, so it does appear to be part of the natural order, right? Sure it does. So we are still left with the belief that killing is wrong and we still do it. We don't need to rationalize that eating animals and plants is just, only necessary. It would seem to me the line would be drawn at unnecessary killing.
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.
She could give birth and put it up for adoption.

And why was she behaving like a ho?
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

booboo COOL IT!!!!
 
I can't stay in these discussions too long anymore. I used to be able to. But to read people being so callous now, comparing unborn babies to scrambled eggs and worse--it's like the bowels of Hell open up and spill their contents for a few minutes, as sort of a preview.

Hating humanity is demonic.

I do not misspeak. I do not say that lightly or as an accident. Talking about the death of humans like it's eating eggs or just a matter of course--it's unspeakable evil. It's straight from the pit of Hell. Literally.

God help us
.
Hating humanity is demonic.

christian coinage is a dime a dozen ...

images


how many cattle and chickens are consumed in a day ... they have a place in Garden Earth the same as all other living beings - but not for the aberration above, vial creature. it is your demonic religion, the desert religions that is destroying both humanity and the Garden of Life from whence they came.

When you think chickens are more important than humans, you have lost your way entire.

Only grace can save you now.
 
A seed isn't life. It's a seed.

You seem to be equating a human life to a cow or deer, right? Do you think they are equal? I don't. Do you think it is wrong to end all life no matter what? That would certainly be the highest standard. But we will have to eat plants which are living. So we are still going to kill something. If we look at nature we see animals eating other animals, so it does appear to be part of the natural order, right? Sure it does. So we are still left with the belief that killing is wrong and we still do it. We don't need to rationalize that eating animals and plants is just, only necessary. It would seem to me the line would be drawn at unnecessary killing.
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.
She could give birth and put it up for adoption.

And why was she behaving like a ho?
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

sealybobo, solidly in favor of HUMAN TRAFFICKING

Way to go bobo
 
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.
She could give birth and put it up for adoption.

And why was she behaving like a ho?
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

booboo COOL IT!!!!
I think it’s a great idea. A lot of women who get pregnant by a guy who can pay child support will keep the kid. If he’s a loser they abort.

So money is clearly a key factor.

There are lots of women who want to adopt. If paying the mother $20k to keep the kid, I don’t see the problem.

And I would think anti abortion people would like it that kids aren’t being aborted.

But they don’t want to pay. Typical,
 
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.
She could give birth and put it up for adoption.

And why was she behaving like a ho?
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

sealybobo, solidly in favor of HUMAN TRAFFICKING

Way to go bobo
I’m just saying anti abortionists should reward women for having their babies.
 
Some people feel the same way about us killing cows. I actually agree more with them than I do you. It’s just a human seed. It’s not a precious life yet. Just a seed.

The sooner the better. I don’t like them to be too developed when they are aborted.

It’s just a life. I feel more sorry for the deer I shoot. Poor thing.

Pay poor and middle class people more and you’ll see less people aborting. Make having kids real cheap you’ll see more babies born. You won’t do that so abortion it is.
A seed isn't life. It's a seed.

You seem to be equating a human life to a cow or deer, right? Do you think they are equal? I don't. Do you think it is wrong to end all life no matter what? That would certainly be the highest standard. But we will have to eat plants which are living. So we are still going to kill something. If we look at nature we see animals eating other animals, so it does appear to be part of the natural order, right? Sure it does. So we are still left with the belief that killing is wrong and we still do it. We don't need to rationalize that eating animals and plants is just, only necessary. It would seem to me the line would be drawn at unnecessary killing.
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
 
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.
She could give birth and put it up for adoption.

And why was she behaving like a ho?
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

booboo COOL IT!!!!
I think it’s a great idea. A lot of women who get pregnant by a guy who can pay child support will keep the kid. If he’s a loser they abort.

So money is clearly a key factor.

There are lots of women who want to adopt. If paying the mother $20k to keep the kid, I don’t see the problem.

And I would think anti abortion people would like it that kids aren’t being aborted.

But they don’t want to pay. Typical,
Wouldn’t that just keep encouraging them to be irresponsible by rewarding their behaviors?
 
A seed isn't life. It's a seed.

You seem to be equating a human life to a cow or deer, right? Do you think they are equal? I don't. Do you think it is wrong to end all life no matter what? That would certainly be the highest standard. But we will have to eat plants which are living. So we are still going to kill something. If we look at nature we see animals eating other animals, so it does appear to be part of the natural order, right? Sure it does. So we are still left with the belief that killing is wrong and we still do it. We don't need to rationalize that eating animals and plants is just, only necessary. It would seem to me the line would be drawn at unnecessary killing.
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
 
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
Not a false comparison at all. They are both rationalizations of bad acts.
 
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.
She could give birth and put it up for adoption.

And why was she behaving like a ho?
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

booboo COOL IT!!!!
I think it’s a great idea. A lot of women who get pregnant by a guy who can pay child support will keep the kid. If he’s a loser they abort.

So money is clearly a key factor.

There are lots of women who want to adopt. If paying the mother $20k to keep the kid, I don’t see the problem.

And I would think anti abortion people would like it that kids aren’t being aborted.

But they don’t want to pay. Typical,
Wouldn’t that just keep encouraging them to be irresponsible by rewarding their behaviors?
If there are women who want the babies enough to pay $20k so be it.

Maybe we make the payout $5k. All the costs of giving birth plus you walk away with $5k. You have to be drug free. A private citizen foots the bill.

So you don’t have black market baby sales it has to go through official channels but make this an option to women deciding if they want to abort.
 
And to that pregnant woman an abortion is necessary.
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
How safe is it for the life being terminated?
 
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
Not a false comparison at all. They are both rationalizations of bad acts.
I’ll say this. Getting an abortion isn’t a good act
 
She could give birth and put it up for adoption.

And why was she behaving like a ho?
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

booboo COOL IT!!!!
I think it’s a great idea. A lot of women who get pregnant by a guy who can pay child support will keep the kid. If he’s a loser they abort.

So money is clearly a key factor.

There are lots of women who want to adopt. If paying the mother $20k to keep the kid, I don’t see the problem.

And I would think anti abortion people would like it that kids aren’t being aborted.

But they don’t want to pay. Typical,
Wouldn’t that just keep encouraging them to be irresponsible by rewarding their behaviors?
If there are women who want the babies enough to pay $20k so be it.

Maybe we make the payout $5k. All the costs of giving birth plus you walk away with $5k. You have to be drug free. A private citizen foots the bill.

So you don’t have black market baby sales it has to go through official channels but make this an option to women deciding if they want to abort.
Sounds like commercialization to me.
 
Actually it isn't.
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
How safe is it for the life being terminated?
Have you ever tortured a fetus?
 
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
Not a false comparison at all. They are both rationalizations of bad acts.
I’ll say this. Getting an abortion isn’t a good act
Neither is pumping out babies for sale.
 
I could see being in a position where it is necessary for me.

Or let’s say a poor girl has sex with a bum. He isn’t going to help her. She’s barely paying her rent now. To that girl an abortion is absolutely necessary.

an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
How safe is it for the life being terminated?
Have you ever tortured a fetus?
Not that I’m aware of.

Did you know you purposely use the term fetus to dehumanize a human life?
 
They should let women sell them. If a kid was worth $20,000 a lot of women would give birth for the payout.

booboo COOL IT!!!!
I think it’s a great idea. A lot of women who get pregnant by a guy who can pay child support will keep the kid. If he’s a loser they abort.

So money is clearly a key factor.

There are lots of women who want to adopt. If paying the mother $20k to keep the kid, I don’t see the problem.

And I would think anti abortion people would like it that kids aren’t being aborted.

But they don’t want to pay. Typical,
Wouldn’t that just keep encouraging them to be irresponsible by rewarding their behaviors?
If there are women who want the babies enough to pay $20k so be it.

Maybe we make the payout $5k. All the costs of giving birth plus you walk away with $5k. You have to be drug free. A private citizen foots the bill.

So you don’t have black market baby sales it has to go through official channels but make this an option to women deciding if they want to abort.
Sounds like commercialization to me.
Ok $2k. Maybe some women, actually a lot of women don’t have the baby and put it up for adoption is what’s in it for them? Besides doing the right thing.

Let her walk with $2k cash. And you know the kid will go to a good family.

I’m just trying to entice women into going through with the birth.
 
booboo COOL IT!!!!
I think it’s a great idea. A lot of women who get pregnant by a guy who can pay child support will keep the kid. If he’s a loser they abort.

So money is clearly a key factor.

There are lots of women who want to adopt. If paying the mother $20k to keep the kid, I don’t see the problem.

And I would think anti abortion people would like it that kids aren’t being aborted.

But they don’t want to pay. Typical,
Wouldn’t that just keep encouraging them to be irresponsible by rewarding their behaviors?
If there are women who want the babies enough to pay $20k so be it.

Maybe we make the payout $5k. All the costs of giving birth plus you walk away with $5k. You have to be drug free. A private citizen foots the bill.

So you don’t have black market baby sales it has to go through official channels but make this an option to women deciding if they want to abort.
Sounds like commercialization to me.
Ok $2k. Maybe some women, actually a lot of women don’t have the baby and put it up for adoption is what’s in it for them? Besides doing the right thing.

Let her walk with $2k cash. And you know the kid will go to a good family.

I’m just trying to entice women into going through with the birth.
I think most of them cover the medical costs and provide humanitarian assistance.
 
an abortion might also be necessary to the welfare of HER OTHER CHILDREN
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
How safe is it for the life being terminated?
Have you ever tortured a fetus?
Not that I’m aware of.

Did you know you purposely use the term fetus to dehumanize a human life?
Yup. Life isn’t that precious. It’s too soon in the development of that human to say the woman must give birth.

Now in 4 months she can’t abort. We as a society have set a time that you can’t cross unless the kids going to be a retard then you can late term abort. I would do it.
 
because then they can realize they are lucky to be alive?

Killing one child for the sake of another is pretty much the same logic the nazis used in killing da Joos.
False comparison.

But even if yes, if one child has to die so that one may live, so be it. Either I can or can’t take care of two kids.

We as intelligent creatures are able to have a safe quick simple effective outpatient procedure to plan when and if we raise a family. You’re making a lot out of nuttin
How safe is it for the life being terminated?
Have you ever tortured a fetus?
Not that I’m aware of.

Did you know you purposely use the term fetus to dehumanize a human life?
Yup. Life isn’t that precious. It’s too soon in the development of that human to say the woman must give birth.

Now in 4 months she can’t abort. We as a society have set a time that you can’t cross unless the kids going to be a retard then you can late term abort. I would do it.
Yes life is that precious. Wait until just before you lose yours and then you will sing a different tune.
 
Back
Top Bottom