You’ve missed a lot then. Flipping your logic around, one could argue that the embryo might be another Hitler so no loss.Never seen anyone convicted of murder innocent. Besides ,most of 'em have criminal records anyway. So no loss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’ve missed a lot then. Flipping your logic around, one could argue that the embryo might be another Hitler so no loss.Never seen anyone convicted of murder innocent. Besides ,most of 'em have criminal records anyway. So no loss.
I am pro-life, my view is that unless human rights mean something divergent to "human rights," the unborn should have them. As a consequence, I believe nearly all abortion should be banned (the typical 99% or more or cases). There are potential exceptions which I remain agnostic on but these do not make up the paradigm of incidents. Otherwise, I have never heard a good argument for legal abortion and I will openly argue that it ought to be banned.
No. It shouldn’t
So what you are saying here is that you favor Christian Sharia Law in the U.S.?I am pro-life, my view is that unless human rights mean something divergent to "human rights," the unborn should have them. As a consequence, I believe nearly all abortion should be banned (the typical 99% or more or cases). There are potential exceptions which I remain agnostic on but these do not make up the paradigm of incidents. Otherwise, I have never heard a good argument for legal abortion and I will openly argue that it ought to be banned.
All violent crimes should be Capital Crimes.You’ve missed a lot then. Flipping your logic around, one could argue that the embryo might be another Hitler so no loss.
No, but sure seems like your stupid illiterate ass can't read.So what you are saying here is that you favor Christian Sharia Law in the U.S.?
By definition a baby has been born , and by us 14th and title 1 section 8 of us code , an per son ( male and countable by census ) born is entitled to equal protection of law that would include a protected wright to life .How is that a matter? The difference between bringing a murderer or traitor to justice is worlds apart from murdering an innocent baby.
That is what i keep thinking about thumb buzz down without a competent retort .Well we sure as hell didn’t hear a “good argument” from you. Considering you didn’t make one at all.
Still murder. If they would not whore around ,there would be no abortion. And Murderers deserve Capital Punishment." Public Egoism Of Psychological Vampires "
* Sew Says Acclaimed Carnal Knowledge Carnivore *
By definition a baby has been born , and by us 14th and title 1 section 8 of us code , an per son ( male and countable by census ) born is entitled to equal protection of law that would include a protected wright to life .
A state is not concerned with when life begins , or whether life exists at all in the case of capital punishment , rather a legitimate state interest is only concerned with whether a wright to life exists .
A zygote , embryo , or fetus has not met a live birth requirement to receive equal protection with a citizen and would therefore be subject to the moral relativism within nature .
Any subject to capital punishment has had its wright to life removed and would therefore be subject to the moral relativism within nature .
Any born and on resuscitation would require due process to have its wright to life removed and be subject to the moral relativism within nature .
So are you thinking that every unwanted pregnancy is simply the result of the woman "whoring" around?Still murder. If they would not whore around ,there would be no abortion. And Murderers deserve Capital Punishment.
The Men are called "Players". The Male equivelant of Whores.So are you thinking that every unwanted pregnancy is simply the result of the woman "whoring" around?
Only the woman, never the men?
Admit it then.
This is not really about "saving babies" is it?
It is about controlling women's sexuality.
Keeping them in their place like the breeding livestock that God intended for them to be.
Right?
What other core inane internalization would a conservative versus liberal paradigm represent ?So are you thinking that every unwanted pregnancy is simply the result of the woman "whoring" around?
Only the woman, never the men?
Admit it then.
This is not really about "saving babies" is it?
It is about controlling women's sexuality.
Keeping them in their place like the breeding livestock that God intended for them to be.
Right?
An after life , a chance for eternal life , the life to come , reincarnation , transmutation of soles , being born again , are all metaphors for passing on ones genetic identity , one haploid at a time , so that another , both figuratively and literally as oneself , may have an opportunity to experience sentience and sapience afforded by a sophisticated physical state , where failure to do so in perpetuity is ascribed the metaphors of final judgement or eternal damnation .Still murder. If they would not whore around ,there would be no abortion. And Murderers deserve Capital Punishment.
Ask yourselfWhy does the death cult always think this is a good argument![]()
So criminals are NEVER rehabilitated?Never seen anyone convicted of murder innocent. Besides ,most of 'em have criminal records anyway. So no loss.
Not violent criminals. Besides ,I believe in Retribution. Not Rehab. Many will not agree ,of course. That is ones right as Americans.So criminals are NEVER rehabilitated?
What a crock
IMHO
It is your right to entertain such a belief, and to follow it yourself.I am pro-life, my view is that unless human rights mean something divergent to "human rights," the unborn should have them...
Give the fetus a right to a jury trial and appeals, just like those facing the death penalty, then the comparison is valid.So pro-lifer, you oppose the death penalty?
An interesting concept there.Give the fetus a right to a jury trial and appeals, just like those facing the death penalty, then the comparison is valid.
Would Hitler "terminate" the defective among us?Would you allow a woman to choose to terminate her pregnancy if it was the result of rape or incest, or if the fetus was so horrible malformed that survival outside the womb wouldn't be possible? What if the mother's health would be severely compromised, to the point of it being life threatening?
Would you have a problem with a woman choosing to terminate in those scenarios?