Abortion is murder

[ding]

It is to me. You got anything else?

Don't need anything else as it doesn't matter what it means to you.

Words have meaning.

Murder is the unlawful taking of another human being's life.

Abortion, in cases where it's legal -- is not murder. And it doesn't become murder because some morons want to call it that.

I see. You are a moral relativist. As long as it is lawful, you are ok with it. Slavery was lawful at one time too. Had you been around back then would you stll have the same opinion. I mean after all, SCOTUS ruled that slaves were property to be disposed of at the will of their owners.

Just curious, how do you propose forcing women to carry babies to term?

Who said I am? Do you think abortion ends a human life?

It is to me. You got anything else?

Don't need anything else as it doesn't matter what it means to you.

Words have meaning.

Murder is the unlawful taking of another human being's life.

Abortion, in cases where it's legal -- is not murder. And it doesn't become murder because some morons want to call it that.

I see. You are a moral relativist. As long as it is lawful, you are ok with it. Slavery was lawful at one time too. Had you been around back then would you stll have the same opinion. I mean after all, SCOTUS ruled that slaves were property to be disposed of at the will of their owners.

Just curious, how do you propose forcing women to carry babies to term?

Who said I am? Do you think abortion ends a human life?

Are you ready to outlaw abortion?

That depends on your answer to my questions. Do you believe that a human life begins at conception and do you believe it is wrong to end a human life?

 

[Divine Wind]

...Does this sound like I am a liberal to you?

Your lies and refusal to discuss honestly? Yep, sounds like a ******* intolerant low-life liberal to me.

You asked me if I believed in God, a subject that has nothing to do with this thread anymore than serving one's nation. I answered honestly, you dodged. You continued to pass lies, make false accusations and twist the truth just like a ******* liberal.

Example:

..You are upset because I am showing you that human life begins at conception and that does not fit your belief that abortion is just....

Quote one single post where I disagreed that "human life begins at conception". Just one, Ding. The fact remains, like those ******* liberal *****, you're a liar. You make false accusations and twist peoples words just like those ******* liberal *****.

Anyone who cares to do so can scroll up and see I've agreed to several of your posts where is says "human life begins at conception". What you are being dishonest about and what you are dodging, like your cowardly refusal to support our military, is that a zygote is not a human being. No sir, you are no Christian and you are no conservative. You're an unrepentant sack of human refuse just like those lying liberal ***** mentioned previously.

When you are repentant for your lies and seek to discuss this honestly, maybe I'll have some respect for you and not think of you as a ******* low-life liberal.

 

[Divine Wind]

...I see no difference between you and the screaming, intolerant far Left ***** who dog pile on anyone who disagrees with them. Those ******* pussies are hateful to the point of violence and you are simply the flip side of that same coin of hate and intolerance. They scream about the "alt-right" when, in fact, they are the Alt-Left. Again, no difference except in polarity. All can go **** themselves with a baseball bat then dive off a bridge onto a pile of rocks. The world is better off without such hateful, intolerant ******* hypocrites. You are free to go down your little list as you hold it in your trembling little hands, but I'm positive it will simply prove me correct; you are so far right that anyone to the left of you will be labeled a "Liberal Socialist" just like a list from your counterparts would show that anyone to the right of them is a "Conservative Capitalist". Fine. All are simply proof of how fucked up our society has become to the point where words like "tolerance" and "civil discussion" have come to mean "you're not with us!!!"...

My goodness, you sure do get emotional about your beliefs. That is exactly what we would expect to see from someone who has had his religion attacked. The reality is that the only one who has acted irrationally is you. Why? Because science proves you wrong and because you cannot face your incongruity. You could have just as easily admitted that human life does begin at conception but that you still supported a woman's right to end the life of her baby. But you won't do that because you don't want to admit that you support doing something wrong. So instead you have rationalized that wrong is right. Look, we both know it is wrong because women agonize over making these decisions. So instead of getting all high and mighty because I spoke the truth and called you out on rationalizing your support of something that is wrong as really being right, you could just man up to the fact that it is wrong but that you still support a woman's choice. Then we could move on to the next discussion and you just might finsd what I had to say more agreeable to what you believe. But I will not rationalize that ending a human life is good.

Ahh, proof that you are soft on "screaming, intolerant far Left ***** who dog pile on anyone who disagrees with them". Interesting.

Did you make a career in the military? If not, then you must be a military-hating liberal. Another reason not only to distrust you, but to prove you are not the tolerant, rational person you believe yourself to be. A second reason is because you are just like PC.

No. That is not proof of me being soft. It is not proof of me being hard. It is not proof of me being a military-hating liberal. It is proof that I am awake. I really couldn't care less what you believe about me. You have clearly gotten your feathers ruffled and that's a good thing. Truth usually hurts before it helps. I have pointed out you incongruity. My obligation is satisfied. What you choose to do with it is up to you. It appears that you are still not ready that you believe abortion does end a human life and that it is wrong to do so, but you still support women doing it.

I think if we go down the list, you and I will see you are, indeed, a military hating liberal.

Why did you dodge the military service question? You and I both know why: you never served.

Why didn't you make the military a career? Because you and I both know you are a spineless coward aka military-hating liberal. See how that works? Now go ahead and keep accusing me of being a ******* liberal and a cocksucking socialist like you did before. Go ahead and falsely accuse me of being anti-science. That's what cowardly military-hating liberals do, isn't it?

You're a liar, Ding. You've told multiple lies about me and never apologized. Do you believe in God, Ding? You're certainly not a Christian who believes in the Ten Commandments since you're repeatedly borne false witness against me. Worse, you're unrepentant about it. That's two great sins which you keep repeating every time you post.

Why did you dodge my questions? I was honest in answering yours. A good Christian would be honest enough to return the courtesy, but as I already proved, you're an unrepentant liar and, therefore, unlikely to be a Christian.

It's okay if you never joined the military. I was just curious if you didn't give a flying **** about this great nation of ours or if you had a disease such as Jellied Spine or Limpus Dickus that prevented you from defending our nation.

I just answered your question. Go back and read what I wrote. Stop being butt hurt. That too is a sign of a modern liberal.

Quote please because it looks like you dodged the question to me....just like a *******, lying piece of shit liberal. Why didn't you join the military? Were you too good for it? Are military people beneath someone as important as you? Were you born without a spine?

 

[ding]

...Does this sound like I am a liberal to you?

Your lies and refusal to discuss honestly? Yep, sounds like a ******* intolerant low-life liberal to me.

You asked me if I believed in God, a subject that has nothing to do with this thread anymore than serving one's nation. I answered honestly, you dodged. You continued to pass lies, make false accusations and twist the truth just like a ******* liberal.

Example:

..You are upset because I am showing you that human life begins at conception and that does not fit your belief that abortion is just....

Quote one single post where I disagreed that "human life begins at conception". Just one, Ding. The fact remains, like those ******* liberal *****, you're a liar. You make false accusations and twist peoples words just like those ******* liberal *****.

Anyone who cares to do so can scroll up and see I've agreed to several of your posts where is says "human life begins at conception". What you are being dishonest about and what you are dodging, like your cowardly refusal to support our military, is that a zygote is not a human being. No sir, you are no Christian and you are no conservative. You're an unrepentant sack of human refuse just like those lying liberal ***** mentioned previously.

When you are repentant for your lies and seek to discuss this honestly, maybe I'll have some respect for you and not think of you as a ******* low-life liberal.

Wow, you have really got a hard on going. So why do you support abortion, amigo?

 

[ding]

...I see no difference between you and the screaming, intolerant far Left ***** who dog pile on anyone who disagrees with them. Those ******* pussies are hateful to the point of violence and you are simply the flip side of that same coin of hate and intolerance. They scream about the "alt-right" when, in fact, they are the Alt-Left. Again, no difference except in polarity. All can go **** themselves with a baseball bat then dive off a bridge onto a pile of rocks. The world is better off without such hateful, intolerant ******* hypocrites. You are free to go down your little list as you hold it in your trembling little hands, but I'm positive it will simply prove me correct; you are so far right that anyone to the left of you will be labeled a "Liberal Socialist" just like a list from your counterparts would show that anyone to the right of them is a "Conservative Capitalist". Fine. All are simply proof of how fucked up our society has become to the point where words like "tolerance" and "civil discussion" have come to mean "you're not with us!!!"...

My goodness, you sure do get emotional about your beliefs. That is exactly what we would expect to see from someone who has had his religion attacked. The reality is that the only one who has acted irrationally is you. Why? Because science proves you wrong and because you cannot face your incongruity. You could have just as easily admitted that human life does begin at conception but that you still supported a woman's right to end the life of her baby. But you won't do that because you don't want to admit that you support doing something wrong. So instead you have rationalized that wrong is right. Look, we both know it is wrong because women agonize over making these decisions. So instead of getting all high and mighty because I spoke the truth and called you out on rationalizing your support of something that is wrong as really being right, you could just man up to the fact that it is wrong but that you still support a woman's choice. Then we could move on to the next discussion and you just might finsd what I had to say more agreeable to what you believe. But I will not rationalize that ending a human life is good.

Ahh, proof that you are soft on "screaming, intolerant far Left ***** who dog pile on anyone who disagrees with them". Interesting.

Did you make a career in the military? If not, then you must be a military-hating liberal. Another reason not only to distrust you, but to prove you are not the tolerant, rational person you believe yourself to be. A second reason is because you are just like PC.

No. That is not proof of me being soft. It is not proof of me being hard. It is not proof of me being a military-hating liberal. It is proof that I am awake. I really couldn't care less what you believe about me. You have clearly gotten your feathers ruffled and that's a good thing. Truth usually hurts before it helps. I have pointed out you incongruity. My obligation is satisfied. What you choose to do with it is up to you. It appears that you are still not ready that you believe abortion does end a human life and that it is wrong to do so, but you still support women doing it.

I think if we go down the list, you and I will see you are, indeed, a military hating liberal.

Why did you dodge the military service question? You and I both know why: you never served.

Why didn't you make the military a career? Because you and I both know you are a spineless coward aka military-hating liberal. See how that works? Now go ahead and keep accusing me of being a ******* liberal and a cocksucking socialist like you did before. Go ahead and falsely accuse me of being anti-science. That's what cowardly military-hating liberals do, isn't it?

You're a liar, Ding. You've told multiple lies about me and never apologized. Do you believe in God, Ding? You're certainly not a Christian who believes in the Ten Commandments since you're repeatedly borne false witness against me. Worse, you're unrepentant about it. That's two great sins which you keep repeating every time you post.

Why did you dodge my questions? I was honest in answering yours. A good Christian would be honest enough to return the courtesy, but as I already proved, you're an unrepentant liar and, therefore, unlikely to be a Christian.

It's okay if you never joined the military. I was just curious if you didn't give a flying **** about this great nation of ours or if you had a disease such as Jellied Spine or Limpus Dickus that prevented you from defending our nation.

I just answered your question. Go back and read what I wrote. Stop being butt hurt. That too is a sign of a modern liberal.

Quote please because it looks like you dodged the question to me....just like a *******, lying piece of shit liberal. Why didn't you join the military? Were you too good for it? Are military people beneath someone as important as you? Were you born without a spine?

Ok, you are still off topic, brother. Try and focus, you are going to wreck your autoimmune system. Where did I leave off... oh, yeah... No one can deny human beings begin at conception... except of course closest modern liberals. Please come out of the closet.

“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. was first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:

“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”

 

[MaryL]

No, it isn't. Abortion is akin to removing a cancerous tumor. It has all the markers and DNA of a sentient independent human being. But it ISN'T, a undeveloped fetus is just a mass of cells. Just like cancer cells. Do cancer cells have the same religious right to life, too? They are just as human and god created them, too. This is silly. And, god let Jesus die on the cross, his only begotten son. God dosen't seem to have problem killing his 30 year old son when it fits HIS needs. Um, what do we mortals take away from THAT?

 

[ding]

No, it isn't. Abortion is akin to removing a cancerous tumor. It has all the markers and DNA of a sentient independent human being. But it ISN'T, a undeveloped fetus is just a mass of cells. Just like cancer cells. Do cancer cells have the same religious right to life, too? They are just as human and god created them, too. This is silly. And, god let Jesus die on the cross, his only begotten son. God dosen't seem to have problem killing his son. Um, what do we mortals take away from THAT?

Science tells us otherwise.

"After fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being...[this] is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence...." - Dr Jerome LeJeune, Professor of Genetics at the University of Descartes, Paris, discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down's Syndrome, and Nobel Prize Winner,

 

[ding]

No, it isn't. Abortion is akin to removing a cancerous tumor. It has all the markers and DNA of a sentient independent human being. But it ISN'T, a undeveloped fetus is just a mass of cells. Just like cancer cells. Do cancer cells have the same religious right to life, too? They are just as human and god created them, too. This is silly. And, god let Jesus die on the cross, his only begotten son. God dosen't seem to have problem killing his son. Um, what do we mortals take away from THAT?

It's alive!

"An individual human life begins at conception when a sperm cell from the father fuses with an egg cell from the mother, to form a new cell, the zygote, the first embryonic stage. The zygote grows and divides into two daughter cells, each of which grows and divides into two grand-daughter cells, and this cell growth/division process continues on, over and over again. The zygote is the start of a biological continuum that automatically grows and develops, passing gradually and sequentially through the stages we call foetus, baby, child, adult, old person and ending eventually in death. The full genetic instructions to guide the development of the continuum, in interaction with its environment, are present in the zygote. Every stage along the continuum is biologically human and each point along the continuum has the full human properties appropriate to that point."
Dr. William Reville, University College Cork, Ireland

 

[MaryL]

Didn't god sacrifice his son on the Cross? Our current legal system would call that negligent homocide. Allowing your child to be killed to promote a religion isn't a viable excuse. Jesus died.We don't allow sacrifices anymore. Primitive and inexcusable.

 

[The Great Goose]

No, it isn't. Abortion is akin to removing a cancerous tumor. It has all the markers and DNA of a sentient independent human being. But it ISN'T, a undeveloped fetus is just a mass of cells. Just like cancer cells. Do cancer cells have the same religious right to life, too? They are just as human and god created them, too. This is silly. And, god let Jesus die on the cross, his only begotten son. God dosen't seem to have problem killing his 30 year old son when it fits HIS needs. Um, what do we mortals take away from THAT?

I can't believe the callousness of what you said.

 

[ding]

Didn't god sacrifice his son on the Cross? Our current legal system would call that negligent homocide. Allowing your child to be killed to promote a religion isn't a viable excuse. Jesus died.We don't allow sacrifices anymore. Primitive and inexcusable.

What does that have to do with anything, you crazy loon? I'm not making a faith argument. I am making a scientific argument. Why do you deny science?

P.S. Thanks for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first ones to reject it.

 

[ding]

No, it isn't. Abortion is akin to removing a cancerous tumor. It has all the markers and DNA of a sentient independent human being. But it ISN'T, a undeveloped fetus is just a mass of cells. Just like cancer cells. Do cancer cells have the same religious right to life, too? They are just as human and god created them, too. This is silly. And, god let Jesus die on the cross, his only begotten son. God dosen't seem to have problem killing his 30 year old son when it fits HIS needs. Um, what do we mortals take away from THAT?

I can't believe the callousness of what you said.

Yeah, that was pretty twisted. But what else did you expect from someone who believes in the deification of man, that believes that the basic guiding principles of life do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts and has no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure? Man that was one long run on sentence. Whew!

 

[MaryL]

Didn't god sacrifice his son on the Cross? Our current legal system would call that negligent homocide. Allowing your child to be killed to promote a religion isn't a viable excuse. Jesus died.We don't allow sacrifices anymore. Primitive and inexcusable.

What does that have to do with anything, you crazy loon. I'm not making a faith argument. I am making a scientific argument. Why do you deny science?

P.S. Thanks for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first ones to reject it.

Atheist? Where did you get that from? Is there scientific proof of a soul yet? Give me a break, with the name calling. What is that about? Crazy loon? Nice.

 

[MaryL]

No, it isn't. Abortion is akin to removing a cancerous tumor. It has all the markers and DNA of a sentient independent human being. But it ISN'T, a undeveloped fetus is just a mass of cells. Just like cancer cells. Do cancer cells have the same religious right to life, too? They are just as human and god created them, too. This is silly. And, god let Jesus die on the cross, his only begotten son. God dosen't seem to have problem killing his 30 year old son when it fits HIS needs. Um, what do we mortals take away from THAT?

I can't believe the callousness of what you said.

Yeah, that was pretty twisted. But what else did you expect from someone who believes in the deification of man, that believes that the basic guiding principles of life do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts and has no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure? Man that was one long run on sentence. Whew!

Callousness is in the eye of the beholder. Truly, ever stalk a deer and then shoot it? Then, well, slaughter houses kill plenty of cattle for meat. And then, there is the war, clearly, dehumanizing people and shooting and bombing and other wise destroying other human beings. Callousness is what we do as human beings. Abortion is wrong? We cull animals for less. Abortion is the least evil of all that, but you can paint it any way you like. I am perfectly aware of what it IS.

 

[ding]

Didn't god sacrifice his son on the Cross? Our current legal system would call that negligent homocide. Allowing your child to be killed to promote a religion isn't a viable excuse. Jesus died.We don't allow sacrifices anymore. Primitive and inexcusable.

What does that have to do with anything, you crazy loon. I'm not making a faith argument. I am making a scientific argument. Why do you deny science? P.S. Thanks for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first ones to reject it.

Atheist? Where did you get that from? Is there scientific proof of a soul yet? Give me a break, with the name calling. What is that about? Crazy loon? Nice.

So you believe that calling you an atheist is name calling? I wonder how that will make atheists feel. Yes, anyone who claims that a human life in its earliest stage of human development a lump of tissue and compares it to cancer is a crazy loon. A zygote is a new human being in its earliest stage of human development. It has all of the human attributes that are appropriate for a human being at that stage of its human development. It's DNA is that of a new human being which contains all of the coding to guide it through its entire human life cycle from conception to death. Cancer cells are a disease which occurs when cells make errors in reproducing cells. The science on when life begins is settled. It is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence. So yeah, you are a crazy loon.

 

[MaryL]

Didn't god sacrifice his son on the Cross? Our current legal system would call that negligent homocide. Allowing your child to be killed to promote a religion isn't a viable excuse. Jesus died.We don't allow sacrifices anymore. Primitive and inexcusable.

What does that have to do with anything, you crazy loon. I'm not making a faith argument. I am making a scientific argument. Why do you deny science? P.S. Thanks for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first ones to reject it.

Atheist? Where did you get that from? Is there scientific proof of a soul yet? Give me a break, with the name calling. What is that about? Crazy loon? Nice.

So you believe that calling you an atheist is name calling? I wonder how that will make atheists feel. Yes, anyone who claims that a human life in its earliest stage of human development a lump of tissue and compares it to cancer is a crazy loon. A zygote is a new human being in its earliest stage of human development. It has all of the human attributes that are appropriate for a human being at that stage of its human development. It's DNA is that of a new human being which contains all of the coding to guide it through its entire human life cycle from conception to death. Cancer cells are a disease which occurs when cells make errors in reproducing cells. The science on when life begins is settled. It is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence. so yeah, you are a crazy loon.

Really? How IS abortion MURDER? Because you say so? Define it, convince me.

 

[ding]

Didn't god sacrifice his son on the Cross? Our current legal system would call that negligent homocide. Allowing your child to be killed to promote a religion isn't a viable excuse. Jesus died.We don't allow sacrifices anymore. Primitive and inexcusable.

What does that have to do with anything, you crazy loon. I'm not making a faith argument. I am making a scientific argument. Why do you deny science? P.S. Thanks for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first ones to reject it.

Atheist? Where did you get that from? Is there scientific proof of a soul yet? Give me a break, with the name calling. What is that about? Crazy loon? Nice.

So you believe that calling you an atheist is name calling? I wonder how that will make atheists feel. Yes, anyone who claims that a human life in its earliest stage of human development a lump of tissue and compares it to cancer is a crazy loon. A zygote is a new human being in its earliest stage of human development. It has all of the human attributes that are appropriate for a human being at that stage of its human development. It's DNA is that of a new human being which contains all of the coding to guide it through its entire human life cycle from conception to death. Cancer cells are a disease which occurs when cells make errors in reproducing cells. The science on when life begins is settled. It is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence. so yeah, you are a crazy loon.

Really? How IS abortion MURDER? Because you say so? Define it, convince me.

Since you do not accept that at conception a new human life is created, there is no way to convince you. Besides, you kind of smell like a troll.

 

[Divine Wind]

What does that have to do with anything, you crazy loon? I'm not making a faith argument. I am making a scientific argument. Why do you deny science?

P.S. Thanks for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first ones to reject it.

Your penchant for personal insults aside, you're lying again since you did make a faith-based argument with me earlier in the thread by asking about my faith in God. You know, right before you dodged the question about your dislike of our military.

Let's see... do you believe in God? Or did I nail that one too?

Yes, I do. In fact, I've had a near death experience. It was a pivotal moment in my life. One that caused me to consider the "bigger" things in life and try to forget the intolerant, bullying ***** that seek to destroy anyone who disagrees with them.

...I see no difference between you and the screaming, intolerant far Left ***** who dog pile on anyone who disagrees with them. Those ******* pussies are hateful to the point of violence and you are simply the flip side of that same coin of hate and intolerance. They scream about the "alt-right" when, in fact, they are the Alt-Left. Again, no difference except in polarity. All can go **** themselves with a baseball bat then dive off a bridge onto a pile of rocks. The world is better off without such hateful, intolerant ******* hypocrites. You are free to go down your little list as you hold it in your trembling little hands, but I'm positive it will simply prove me correct; you are so far right that anyone to the left of you will be labeled a "Liberal Socialist" just like a list from your counterparts would show that anyone to the right of them is a "Conservative Capitalist". Fine. All are simply proof of how fucked up our society has become to the point where words like "tolerance" and "civil discussion" have come to mean "you're not with us!!!"...

My goodness, you sure do get emotional about your beliefs. That is exactly what we would expect to see from someone who has had his religion attacked. The reality is that the only one who has acted irrationally is you. Why? Because science proves you wrong and because you cannot face your incongruity. You could have just as easily admitted that human life does begin at conception but that you still supported a woman's right to end the life of her baby. But you won't do that because you don't want to admit that you support doing something wrong. So instead you have rationalized that wrong is right. Look, we both know it is wrong because women agonize over making these decisions. So instead of getting all high and mighty because I spoke the truth and called you out on rationalizing your support of something that is wrong as really being right, you could just man up to the fact that it is wrong but that you still support a woman's choice. Then we could move on to the next discussion and you just might finsd what I had to say more agreeable to what you believe. But I will not rationalize that ending a human life is good.

Ahh, proof that you are soft on "screaming, intolerant far Left ***** who dog pile on anyone who disagrees with them". Interesting.

Did you make a career in the military? If not, then you must be a military-hating liberal. Another reason not only to distrust you, but to prove you are not the tolerant, rational person you believe yourself to be. A second reason is because you are just like PC.

 

[Mudda]

Don't need anything else as it doesn't matter what it means to you.

Words have meaning.

Murder is the unlawful taking of another human being's life.

Abortion, in cases where it's legal -- is not murder. And it doesn't become murder because some morons want to call it that.

I see. You are a moral relativist. As long as it is lawful, you are ok with it. Slavery was lawful at one time too. Had you been around back then would you stll have the same opinion. I mean after all, SCOTUS ruled that slaves were property to be disposed of at the will of their owners.

Just curious, how do you propose forcing women to carry babies to term?

Who said I am? Do you think abortion ends a human life?

Don't need anything else as it doesn't matter what it means to you.

Words have meaning.

Murder is the unlawful taking of another human being's life.

Abortion, in cases where it's legal -- is not murder. And it doesn't become murder because some morons want to call it that.

I see. You are a moral relativist. As long as it is lawful, you are ok with it. Slavery was lawful at one time too. Had you been around back then would you stll have the same opinion. I mean after all, SCOTUS ruled that slaves were property to be disposed of at the will of their owners.

Just curious, how do you propose forcing women to carry babies to term?

Who said I am? Do you think abortion ends a human life?

Are you ready to outlaw abortion?

That depends on your answer to my questions. Do you believe that a human life begins at conception and do you believe it is wrong to end a human life?

I asked the question first. Are you afraid to answer?

 

[ding]

I see. You are a moral relativist. As long as it is lawful, you are ok with it. Slavery was lawful at one time too. Had you been around back then would you stll have the same opinion. I mean after all, SCOTUS ruled that slaves were property to be disposed of at the will of their owners.

Just curious, how do you propose forcing women to carry babies to term?

Who said I am? Do you think abortion ends a human life?

I see. You are a moral relativist. As long as it is lawful, you are ok with it. Slavery was lawful at one time too. Had you been around back then would you stll have the same opinion. I mean after all, SCOTUS ruled that slaves were property to be disposed of at the will of their owners.

Just curious, how do you propose forcing women to carry babies to term?

Who said I am? Do you think abortion ends a human life?

Are you ready to outlaw abortion?

That depends on your answer to my questions. Do you believe that a human life begins at conception and do you believe it is wrong to end a human life?

I asked the question first. Are you afraid to answer?

No. Go back and re-read the thread. You didn't. I did. On a side note, I currently have three discussions going on in this thread, one is with a psychopath stalker, another is with a crazy loon who is all over the map and the third one is with a troll who is seeking self pleasure. I find it oddly disturbing that out of the three conversations, the one with you is the most healthy. It appears that we have gone through the looking glass, Alice. Do you mind if I call you Alice, Alice? Man I crack myself up sometimes.