A Question To Conservatives Who Believe In A Ban On Abortions

Many women suffered horribly after giving a baby up for adoption. They never stopped thinking about it.

I simply cannot grasp how even a murderous, sociopathic subhuman bitch such as yourself can see it as a greater tragedy for a child to be adopted into a loving family, than for that child to simply, be killed in cold blood.

Even by what previous standards of murderous evil you have solidly exhibited, this is just incomprehensible.

I guess it just serves to demonstrate the folly of trying to think there's a lowest point of evil that someone will ever reach. When one thinks that one has seen the most extreme nadir of evil, depravity, and madness that your kind can exhibit, that you'll find a way to show that it is possible to go even lower than that.
 
This is one of the realities of abortion laws that people ignore. The slogan should be,
"right to birth" not "right to life" because in too many cases the kid can't be properly cared for.

we-ll-do-whatever-we-can-to-protect-now-you-25915279.png

No, this is one of the lies pro-aborts eagerly believe is reality, so they can pretend that they aren't as bad as they know they are.

The ACTUAL reality is that pro-life people put a lot of their money - THEIR money, not other people's money voted out of their pockets for self-aggrandizement, like leftists do - and their time into helping women who would otherwise get abortions. You would know this, if you spent time listening to pro-lifers, instead of busily "knowing" about them according to your talking points.
 
Because in poverty stricken urban areas it is difficult getting a job above minimum wage. Some states (FL) denied Medicaid expansion. Even then child care is unaffordable. Kids are not monitored enough. If abortion was not possible you will end up with inner city kids who can't find jobs and a mother pissed at life in general. If a mother can't handle any more kids it should be her decision.
.

"Look at all these government programs I vote for that you refuse to agree to give unlimited funding to!! Only government spending is compassion!"

*yawn*
 
You would be one of the few who supports that.
Republicans whined when people were getting paid to stay home, women couldn't get child care.
Republicans don't want to pay for maternity leave either.

Out of the 193 member states of the United Nations, only a handful do not have a national paid parental leave law: New Guinea, Suriname, a few South Pacific Island nations, and the United States. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) reports that the U.S. is the only developed country in the world that does not have a national law on paid maternity leave.

"Look at all these government programs I vote for that you refuse to agree to give unlimited funding to!! Only government spending is compassion!"

*yawn*
 
I don't recall republicans being an expert on conservatism...........................except when a democrat is in office or at election time, it's only then, they whine about the debt/deficit and spending.

Awww, like most republicans, can't stand the truth.

FYI, comedians watch/listen to the news too.
That would be where they get most of their material from.

April 23 2020
Senate Republicans' negotiations over a $1.6 trillion coronavirus stimulus package have reached an impasse partly due a Republican opposition to a Democratic proposal to provide additional funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), a federal program that provides low-income individuals and families with an Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card that works like a debit card for purchasing food in local stores.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which manages the program, said that requests for emergency food benefits went up by $2 billion last month as more than 22 million Americans found themselves unemployed due to the ongoing epidemic.

November 10 2021
Biden’s bill making its way through Congress would put the U.S. on course to providing free prekindergarten, paid family leave to care for children or sick loved ones, and an enhanced child tax credit in a massive expansion of federal support to working families.

Like Nixon 50 years years ago, Republicans worry that providing an expanded federal safety net for American households with children is a slippery slope toward a socialist-style system.

Republicans say the programs’ costs— almost $400 billion for the child care and preschool piece alone — are far too high and would create more government intrusion into families’ lives.

Echoing Nixon’s words, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell called Biden’s approach “radical” in a speech on the Senate floor last week. McConnell said Biden’s administration “wants to insert itself into the most intimate family decisions and tell parents how to care for their toddlers.”


For some yes.
Some can't afford it, some have been molested or raped.
The fetus may have a birth defect or other malady.
It's up to the woman, especially if the man isn't in her life anymore, no family support.

I would prefer the woman have the kid and put it up for adoption, there are some people that will support a woman to do that, I'm all for it.

Not viable for most women.

Your morals standards are bankrupt, like most republicans, they claim they are pro life, in reality, just being pro birth.

"Let me inject Republicans into this, so that I can talk about what I WISH you had said, instead of your actual words!!! Why won't you stick to my mind script so I can feel smart!?"
 
No, this is one of the lies pro-aborts eagerly believe is reality, so they can pretend that they aren't as bad as they know they are.

The ACTUAL reality is that pro-life people put a lot of their money - THEIR money, not other people's money voted out of their pockets for self-aggrandizement, like leftists do - and their time into helping women who would otherwise get abortions. You would know this, if you spent time listening to pro-lifers, instead of busily "knowing" about them according to your talking points.
If pro-lifers provide living wages during late pregnancy; child care for working mothers; hospital costs for the uninsured; a program similar to SNAP; and to AFDC; and if they provide this as needed with no time limit, then I commend them.

However the government attitude is that those people are welfare queens and they would like to diminish those programs. At least Biden supports paid pregnancy leave.
.
 
Of course, there's a huge difference, which makes your remark entirely irrelevant and meaningless.

Abortion, by intent and effect, kills an innocent human being.

Wearing a mask does nothing at all, other than to impose unnecessary inconvenience, discomfort, and cost on people, for no benefit whatsoever other than a false sense of safety.

Even for you, it's just plain absurd to try to tie the two matters together in the manner that you have.
Wow. So you guys believe whether or not to wear a face mask is of far greater importance and burden on your rights and liberty than the decision of whether or not to have a child.

Trust me. You’d never survive childbirth without severe PTSD.
 
Wow. So you guys believe whether or not to wear a face mask is of far greater importance and burden on your rights and liberty than the decision of whether or not to have a child.

You put the “right” to murder an innocent child in cold blood above anything to do with choosing or not choosing to wear a stupid mask that gives no benefit whatsoever; and you're trying to suggest that I have priority issues?

You're not just pure, murderous evil. You're insane as well. And no, I do not accept your insanity as any excuse or dimishment of the evil that you openly embrace and promote.
 
The only authority I claim is the same authority YOU claim, the right to control your own body.

I have to laugh…except it isn’t really funny. You call a life changing decision on whether or not to start a family, go through nine months of carrying a child, with all it’s attendant risks (17.5% maternal mortality rate)…and then either have your heart ripped out when you give it up for adoption, or another 21 years raising it….an “inconvenience”.

Yet you, when asked to wear a mask, for a temporary period of time, during a pandemic, scream about freedoms and rights.

One is the single most important decision a couple or a woman can make. The other is truly an inconvenience.
Then get your tubes tied so you will STOP COMPLAINING.

 
Wow. So you guys believe whether or not to wear a face mask is of far greater importance and burden on your rights and liberty than the decision of whether or not to have a child.

Trust me. You’d never survive childbirth without severe PTSD.
You are on FULL SPIN CYCLE TONIGHT. Wash ...Rinse ...Repeat.

Do you want a Drama Award. lmao

You don't want a kid then don't spread them legs sugar tits.
 

Forum List

Back
Top