A no BS, non partisan examination of the success of Obama's stimulus package

Since the constitution was drafted :cuckoo:

More proof the far left does not understand the Constitution, but does show their socialist mindset.

Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And you just proved once again the far left does not understand the Constitution.

You are a far left zealot.

Now show the specific passage that proves your socialist comments.
 
A no BS, non partisan, incomplete examination of the success, or failure of the Obama's stimulus package, because all of the variables are not in. :eusa_whistle:

Which ones are missing?

Go ahead. Ill wait.
The fucking money needs to be paid back. Do you think it's free?

No, youre right. It wasn't free. I never said it was. However what it did for the country was well worth it.
 
No, the government needs to operate within its means - that is basic economics. The government takes, and spends wantonly!

It's funny how individuals that know nothing about economics claim "basic economics."

No it isn't.

You should study economics before making completly ignorant statements based on your home economics course in highschool.
 
Care to quote that part?

How are you not getting this? Taxes is a necessary evil. It is what funds our government. The founding fathers fought against taxation without representation, they did not stand against taxation itself.

Tell me, if it isn't in the constitution, who decided that we pay taxes and when?

That wasn't the question. Show me where in the Constitution it says my paycheck belongs to the government.

That's a false question since [edit: your paycheck] doesn't belong to the government.
 
Last edited:
No, the government needs to operate within its means - that is basic economics. The government takes, and spends wantonly!

It's funny how individuals that know nothing about economics claim "basic economics."

No it isn't.

You should study economics before making completly ignorant statements based on your home economics course in highschool.

Funny how the socialists show they don't even understand basic economics.
 
When the money is paid back with interest, you will have the total equation. It is only then that you can debate it's merits.

Bush's tax cuts were more expensive than the Recovery Act. When will see that money back?

How could the Bush tax cuts be more expensive when they didn't cost anything?

Economic cost. Opportunity cost.

What happens if you don't go to work? It costs you a day's pay.
 
No, the government needs to operate within its means - that is basic economics. The government takes, and spends wantonly!

It's funny how individuals that know nothing about economics claim "basic economics."

No it isn't.

You should study economics before making completly ignorant statements based on your home economics course in highschool.

Yes you need a chart for an avatar to know economic stuff....like budget based on what you make and can realistically spend.
 
How are you not getting this? Taxes is a necessary evil. It is what funds our government. The founding fathers fought against taxation without representation, they did not stand against taxation itself.

Tell me, if it isn't in the constitution, who decided that we pay taxes and when?

That wasn't the question. Show me where in the Constitution it says my paycheck belongs to the government.

That's a false question since the government doesn't belong to the government.

To the far left )which has already put on display in this thread) the people belong to the government and the government is GOD.

Your own comments just go to prove how far left you are.
 
Bush's tax cuts were more expensive than the Recovery Act. When will see that money back?

How could the Bush tax cuts be more expensive when they didn't cost anything?

Economic cost. Opportunity cost.

What happens if you don't go to work? It costs you a day's pay.

So the tax cuts cost money because if they hadn't been there the gov't would have collected those extra tax monies, right?
In the bizarro world of liberal static scoring I suppose that's true. It's also true that in that same world if you increased taxes to 100% of all income then the gov't would collect all monies earned.
But the real world doesnt work that way. The tax cuts saved us from the 2001 recession. They were sooo terrible that they were extended by a solid filibuster proof Democratic Congress and signed by the Democrat Obama.
 
What the hell do you think pays for our public school system and fabulous armed forces? TAXES. Less revenue means more borrowing. Over spending is the problem, Not the concept of spending.

Schools and armed forces aren't the spending problem



ooda_loop-albums-1-picture6262-2012-spending.jpg

Dude, your chart is complete bullshit.

OASDI and Medicare Part A are non-descressionary spending and completely paid for by FICA taxes. There is no "spending problem" with OASDI and Medicare Part A. They are deficit neutral.

Medicare Part B and Part D are paid for, at least in part, by the premiums paid by the people that are insured.

Lumping Medicare and OASDI in with Medicade and SNAP is simple bullshit by someone that can't do accounting.
 
Last edited:
What the hell do you think pays for our public school system and fabulous armed forces? TAXES. Less revenue means more borrowing. Over spending is the problem, Not the concept of spending.

Schools and armed forces aren't the spending problem



ooda_loop-albums-1-picture6262-2012-spending.jpg

Dude, your chart is complete bullshit.

OASDI and Medicare Part A are non-descressionary spending and completely paid for by FICA taxes. There is no "spending problem" with OASDI and Medicare Part A. They are deficit neutral.

Medicare Part B and Part D are paid for, at least in part, by the premiums paid by the people that are insured.

You understand you just contradicted yourself, right?
 
That wasn't the question. Show me where in the Constitution it says my paycheck belongs to the government.

That's a false question since the government doesn't belong to the government.

To the far left )which has already put on display in this thread) the people belong to the government and the government is GOD.

Your own comments just go to prove how far left you are.
If posting your paycheck does not belong to the government exposes me as a "far leftist," your response exposes you as a complete flaming imbecile. :cuckoo:
 
No, the government needs to operate within its means - that is basic economics. The government takes, and spends wantonly!

It's funny how individuals that know nothing about economics claim "basic economics."

No it isn't.

You should study economics before making completly ignorant statements based on your home economics course in highschool.
Your a moron - you don't understand what a unsustainable trejectory is; you cannot continue to spend more than what you have - I learned that in 3rd grade. I did not take socialist economics. Please enlighten us.
 
No, the government needs to operate within its means - that is basic economics. The government takes, and spends wantonly!

It's funny how individuals that know nothing about economics claim "basic economics."

No it isn't.

You should study economics before making completly ignorant statements based on your home economics course in highschool.

Yes you need a chart for an avatar to know economic stuff....like budget based on what you make and can realistically spend.

The subject of the OP is with regard to the effectiveness of the stimulous package. That makes it a question of macro economics because the point was that the economy had gone into recession.

So, your comment is meaningless. It isn't a home economic question. It isn't a business accounting question. It isn't a micro economics question. It's a macro question.

Your ignorance is duly noted though.
 
When the money is paid back with interest, you will have the total equation. It is only then that you can debate it's merits.

Bush's tax cuts were more expensive than the Recovery Act. When will see that money back?
That money did not belong to us - it belonged to the tax payer :cool:
Billy is one of these twerps that thinks all money, wealth, property belongs to Government...and by their good graces let Us keep what belongs to US.

This thread is more Leftist/Commie BS IMHO.
 

Forum List

Back
Top