Woodznutz
Platinum Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 26,568
- 13,218
- 973
No physical evidence.So, what evidence can you attribute to the flood from the Noah fable?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No physical evidence.So, what evidence can you attribute to the flood from the Noah fable?
Why not?There would not have been uniform evidence
That would be true of any flood. Yet we find evidence of past floods. But not your fantasy flood.and any evidence has been degraded over time
Threats can also be promises, professor.Smart people should know the difference between threats and promises.
And that's where you claim magic, disqualifying yourself from any rational discussion.No physical evidence.
I wouldn't expect a Sunday Bible school to do anything but press bible school doctrine.From the linked article you provided.
Why is there no evidence of a flood that lasted for a year?
No, there is none.Just because you don't accept it as such, doesn't mean there is none.
Cutting and pasting from charlatans at AIG serves what purpose?No evidence??? LOL
Just because you don't accept it as such, doesn't mean there is none.
View attachment 625595
What Are Some of the Best Flood Evidences? | Answers …
Polystrate Trees | Upright Trees Are Evidence of ...
My faith in the truth and accuracy of the bible is my evidence. Of course others will need physical evidence. In legal terms the bible has the "preponderate weight of evidence" regarding its integrity.And that's where you claim magic, disqualifying yourself from any rational discussion.
Those same people should not presume to be the self-assigned enforcers for the gods.
Of course they do. Proofread what you wrote.They don't, you fail again.
Right, so you are disqualified from usng rational argument or evidence. You have abandoned these concepts.My faith in the truth and accuracy of the bible is my evidence.
No, there is none.
Your Canyon picture certainly is not it. Looks like you got fooled again.
Nobody is going to read the links you never read and spoonfeed them back to you.
I just wish they would read the story more carefully first.I wouldn't expect a Sunday Bible school to do anything but press bible school doctrine.
Cutting and pasting from charlatans at AIG serves what purpose?
What I'm doing is reviewing the story in the light of what is erroneously believed about it. Nothing more.Right, so you are disqualified from usng rational argument or evidence. You have abandoned these concepts.
So just say "because my religious text says so" and move on.
Or is that too honest for you?
That's right."There is no evidence"....................![]()
Yes, nothing more. That's exactly right and represents maybe some accidental honesty on your part.What I'm doing is reviewing the story in the light of what is erroneously believed about it. Nothing more.
I suspect they did and are convinced their version is the correct version. Different versions of bibles and different versions of interpretations of those bibles leads to the different sects and subdivisions of Christianity.I just wish they would read the story more carefully first.