www-newscientist-com.cdn.ampproject.org
That makes a lot of no sense. Well done.
Any "expert" working on a funded project is reporting what the donors what to them to report.Thought you believers might like to argue that god was responsible.
Evolution: Ancient Britons rapidly adapted to cope with lack of sunlight | New Scientist
Ditto.
Is that like clergy telling you about a god because they get paid to tell you?
It's kind of difficult for a member of the clergy to tell me anything when I study as much as they do.
Of course you did. God bless you
And yet another boring ad hominem when you have nothing of substance to post.
Thought you believers might like to argue that god was responsible.
Evolution: Ancient Britons rapidly adapted to cope with lack of sunlight | New Scientist
What evidence? Show it here or shut up.
Just peruse any study of human or animal anatomy and you'll realize the utter impossibility of evolution.
What a disgusting and low-life liar. You pay for the article and then tell us. You're such a dirty, miserable atheist and worst atheist hereThought you believers might like to argue that god was responsible.
Evolution: Ancient Britons rapidly adapted to cope with lack of sunlight | New Scientist
.Christians are allowed an education. Have you ever read Ram Bam? Even the ancient Jews knew the difference between science and myth. They don't reject education.What a disgusting and low-life liar. You pay for the article and then tell us. You're such a dirty, miserable atheist and worst atheist here
Anyway, I win again and the atheists lose. jb - 62. atheists - 0 (as in evidence for evolution).
