RBG obituary "Ginsberg was an advocate of progressive causes". What's wrong with those words? We don't want a Justice who is an advocate based on emotion or political expediency, we want a Justice who bases his/her opinions on the Constitution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
RBG obituary "Ginsberg was an advocate of progressive causes". What's wrong with those words? We don't want a Justice who is an advocate based on emotion or political expediency, we want a Justice who bases his/her opinions on the Constitution.
Assuming that a replacement for Ginsburg has not been confirmed by November 3, and further assuming that Trump loses the election, should a defeated President be allowed to appoint a judge to the Supreme Court?
It should be pointed out, both assumptions are extremely likely. Trump is the least popular President in modern American history.
There is a corollary to the question. Should the defeated party in the Senate be allowed to confirm a Supreme Court judge?
Based on limited researched, I have been unable to find those questions addressed. However, allow me to answer my own questions.
There is absolutely nothing in the past four years to suggest that Trump and Trump Republicans in the Senate will put the will of the American people first.
If Trump is defeated, if the GOP loses control of the Senate -- both likely, why else are Republicans in such a hurry -- and Trump Republicans confirm Ginsburg's replacement, the GOP is likely to lose power for at least a generation.
Not just the Second Amendment, goodbye the entire Bill of Rights.RBG obituary "Ginsberg was an advocate of progressive causes". What's wrong with those words? We don't want a Justice who is an advocate based on emotion or political expediency, we want a Justice who bases his/her opinions on the Constitution.
Progessives go against the Constitution. Its what they do by definition.
They are supposed to uphold the Constitution.
If the Court was stacked 9-0 Liberal.....goodbye 2A . We all know it....so what does that tell you?
Assuming that a replacement for Ginsburg has not been confirmed by November 3, and further assuming that Trump loses the election, should a defeated President be allowed to appoint a judge to the Supreme Court?
It should be pointed out, both assumptions are extremely likely. Trump is the least popular President in modern American history.
There is a corollary to the question. Should the defeated party in the Senate be allowed to confirm a Supreme Court judge?
Based on limited researched, I have been unable to find those questions addressed. However, allow me to answer my own questions.
There is absolutely nothing in the past four years to suggest that Trump and Trump Republicans in the Senate will put the will of the American people first.
If Trump is defeated, if the GOP loses control of the Senate -- both likely, why else are Republicans in such a hurry -- and Trump Republicans confirm Ginsburg's replacement, the GOP is likely to lose power for at least a generation.
There is absolutely nothing in the past four years to suggest that Trump and Trump Republicans in the Senate will put the will of the American people first.
Assuming that a replacement for Ginsburg has not been confirmed by November 3, and further assuming that Trump loses the election, should a defeated President be allowed to appoint a judge to the Supreme Court?
It should be pointed out, both assumptions are extremely likely. Trump is the least popular President in modern American history.
There is a corollary to the question. Should the defeated party in the Senate be allowed to confirm a Supreme Court judge?
Based on limited researched, I have been unable to find those questions addressed. However, allow me to answer my own questions.
There is absolutely nothing in the past four years to suggest that Trump and Trump Republicans in the Senate will put the will of the American people first.
If Trump is defeated, if the GOP loses control of the Senate -- both likely, why else are Republicans in such a hurry -- and Trump Republicans confirm Ginsburg's replacement, the GOP is likely to lose power for at least a generation.
We are at war. Sure...it's currently a cold war...but a war none the less. The Dems have launched their offensive with the universal mail-in voting fiasco. This totally blunts that attack. A Conservative Constitutional Supreme Court will not hand the election to the Dems.
That leaves them high and dry. Trump will be the President. Conservatives will defend their Senators that fought to achieve a conservative court...and that will help down-ballot races.
On the other side...dems are already pissed off and have been since 2016. The only effect on them will demoralization. It takes the Supreme Court off the table. They lose again, and Trump wins again.
KAG.
Exactly. The GOP have absolutely nothing to lose and everything to gain.
The time for niceties ended when Obama and the Democrats spied on the Trump campaign, acused him of being a Russian agent, called him a Nazi, and then staged a phony impeachment.
They tried to destroy Brett Kavanaugh., Crazy Nanshee tearing up the State of the Union address on TV, Biden shamelessly enriching his son and brother....the list is endless.
It is time we send Crazy Nanshee, AOC and her squad of scumbag commies, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, Comrade deBlasio, Governor Nuisance, Governer Half Whitmer, Little Mikey Bloomberg, Governer Cuomo, the entire MSM, Antifa, BLM, and the rest of these America hating shitbirds a clear message - YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED.
This ain't your Daddy's Democrat party, this is a party that hates America and Americans.
The GOP have absolutely nothing to lose and everything to gain.
no. Not even close.
Romney and Murkowski are in the way
Romney and Murkowski are in the way
Romney will fold, also likely Murkowski. Lindsey Graham folded yesterday. The nominee is the KEY and this morning Trump is saying he's very likely to nominate a woman and floated a couple at the top of his list. If Trump nominates a woman it's over, none of these RINO hacks can oppose voting on a woman nominee.
Assuming that a replacement for Ginsburg has not been confirmed by November 3, and further assuming that Trump loses the election, should a defeated President be allowed to appoint a judge to the Supreme Court?
It should be pointed out, both assumptions are extremely likely. Trump is the least popular President in modern American history.
There is a corollary to the question. Should the defeated party in the Senate be allowed to confirm a Supreme Court judge?
Based on limited researched, I have been unable to find those questions addressed. However, allow me to answer my own questions.
There is absolutely nothing in the past four years to suggest that Trump and Trump Republicans in the Senate will put the will of the American people first.
If Trump is defeated, if the GOP loses control of the Senate -- both likely, why else are Republicans in such a hurry -- and Trump Republicans confirm Ginsburg's replacement, the GOP is likely to lose power for at least a generation.
Your assumption of his popularity is based upon evidence that is tenuous at best.
Should he lose (unlikely in my book), he is still president until noon on January 20, 2021. He will replace Ginsberg in any event.
Should the Democrats gain the Senate (also unlikely), the current majority serves until the Christmas recess. They will replace Ginsberg in any event.
With said replacement, it is far more likely that it is you people who will lose power for at least a generation.
Romney and Murkowski are in the way
Romney will fold, also likely Murkowski. Lindsey Graham folded yesterday. The nominee is the KEY and this morning Trump is saying he's very likely to nominate a woman and floated a couple at the top of his list. If Trump nominates a woman it's over, none of these RINO hacks can oppose voting on a woman nominee.
I’m not sure. If Romney, Colins, and Murkowski don’t fold then it won’t happen until after the election