What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

A flat tax revenue system would destroy the Left !!

yidnar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
14,449
Reaction score
7,432
Points
1,020
Location
Inside your head.
With a 10% flat tax rate the left would no longer be able to use class warfare to promote their socialist agenda !! and knowing that Americans taxes cant be raised they would no longer be able to buy votes and freedom with increased spending on social programs !!
 
Last edited:

Truthseeker420

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
10,374
Reaction score
1,010
Points
140
Location
Home of the 2013 BCS National Champion
Talk about slogans.
 

NYcarbineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
117,063
Reaction score
13,866
Points
2,210
Location
Finger Lakes, NY
Steve Forbes proposed a 17% flat tax back in the 80's and the bean counters figured out that it wouldn't come close to covering the spending back then.
 
OP
yidnar

yidnar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
14,449
Reaction score
7,432
Points
1,020
Location
Inside your head.
200million people paying 10 % is a lot of cash !! and the waste that goes on in big government would be reduced because they would not have the means to get more money !!
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,128
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Steve Forbes proposed a 17% flat tax back in the 80's and the bean counters figured out that it wouldn't come close to covering the spending back then.

Bean counters, like many others, have a tendency to ignore information not in front of their eyes. specifically the uncacluated benefits to the economy of a simplified tax system.

Not to mention that any sane person supporting the flat tax also realizes that we need to severely cut government spending.
 

zzzz

Just a regular American
Joined
Jul 24, 2010
Messages
3,080
Reaction score
530
Points
98
Location
Yountsville
The people who are in control will never allow a flat tax without exclusions and exceptions.
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,128
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
The people who are in control will never allow a flat tax without exclusions and exceptions.

Then I suppose, we should take control.
 

NYcarbineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
117,063
Reaction score
13,866
Points
2,210
Location
Finger Lakes, NY
Steve Forbes proposed a 17% flat tax back in the 80's and the bean counters figured out that it wouldn't come close to covering the spending back then.

Bean counters, like many others, have a tendency to ignore information not in front of their eyes. specifically the uncacluated benefits to the economy of a simplified tax system.

Not to mention that any sane person supporting the flat tax also realizes that we need to severely cut government spending.

Kind of like the uncalculated benefits that supply side economics were going to magically produce?

lol

Btw. a 10% flat tax on my top line income (aka gross) would be a tax INCREASE for me, and I don't have any dependents.

Careful what you wish for.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
144,513
Reaction score
32,891
Points
2,180
Steve Forbes proposed a 17% flat tax back in the 80's and the bean counters figured out that it wouldn't come close to covering the spending back then.

You mean the pinko propagandists claimed it wouldn't.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
144,513
Reaction score
32,891
Points
2,180
Kind of like the uncalculated benefits that supply side economics were going to magically produce?

lol

The economy boomed for 20 years after Reagan's tax cuts.

Btw. a 10% flat tax on my top line income (aka gross) would be a tax INCREASE for me, and I don't have any dependents.

Careful what you wish for.

You must be one big time loser. I would be grateful to pay only 10%
 

DiamondDave

Army Vet
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
18,169
Reaction score
2,824
Points
183
Location
MD, on the Potomac River
Steve Forbes proposed a 17% flat tax back in the 80's and the bean counters figured out that it wouldn't come close to covering the spending back then.

And that spending on shit the government has no business in is a problem.... as well as over spending in areas it is constitutionally supposed to be in

Fix the spending... and whatever the flat tax with no loopholes then has to be, do it
 

Greenbeard

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
6,871
Reaction score
1,217
Points
200
Location
New England
Bean counters, like many others, have a tendency to ignore information not in front of their eyes. specifically the uncacluated benefits to the economy of a simplified tax system.

A progressive tax system is not complicated. A tax system with myriad deductions is complicated.
 

NYcarbineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
117,063
Reaction score
13,866
Points
2,210
Location
Finger Lakes, NY
Kind of like the uncalculated benefits that supply side economics were going to magically produce?

lol

The economy boomed for 20 years after Reagan's tax cuts.

Btw. a 10% flat tax on my top line income (aka gross) would be a tax INCREASE for me, and I don't have any dependents.

Careful what you wish for.

You must be one big time loser. I would be grateful to pay only 10%

The Reagan tax cuts produced 11 straight years of triple digit deficits.
 

NYcarbineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
117,063
Reaction score
13,866
Points
2,210
Location
Finger Lakes, NY
The GOP can't support a flat tax; almost all of them are pledged to not raise any taxes on anyone.
 

DiamondDave

Army Vet
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
18,169
Reaction score
2,824
Points
183
Location
MD, on the Potomac River
Kind of like the uncalculated benefits that supply side economics were going to magically produce?

lol

The economy boomed for 20 years after Reagan's tax cuts.

Btw. a 10% flat tax on my top line income (aka gross) would be a tax INCREASE for me, and I don't have any dependents.

Careful what you wish for.

You must be one big time loser. I would be grateful to pay only 10%

The Reagan tax cuts produced 11 straight years of triple digit deficits.

And we have had deficits every single year since 1957... time for a change away from the uber tax and uber spend system, laden with handouts and frivolous spending, wouldn't you say??
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,128
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Kind of like the uncalculated benefits that supply side economics were going to magically produce?

lol

The economy boomed for 20 years after Reagan's tax cuts.

Btw. a 10% flat tax on my top line income (aka gross) would be a tax INCREASE for me, and I don't have any dependents.

Careful what you wish for.

You must be one big time loser. I would be grateful to pay only 10%

As would I, and I dont make nearly enough money.
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,128
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Bean counters, like many others, have a tendency to ignore information not in front of their eyes. specifically the uncacluated benefits to the economy of a simplified tax system.

A progressive tax system is not complicated. A tax system with myriad deductions is complicated.

And a flat tax is even simplier.
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,128
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Kind of like the uncalculated benefits that supply side economics were going to magically produce?

lol

The economy boomed for 20 years after Reagan's tax cuts.

Btw. a 10% flat tax on my top line income (aka gross) would be a tax INCREASE for me, and I don't have any dependents.

Careful what you wish for.

You must be one big time loser. I would be grateful to pay only 10%

The Reagan tax cuts produced 11 straight years of triple digit deficits.

No, that would be the Reagan spending.
 

auditor0007

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
12,566
Reaction score
2,265
Points
255
Location
Toledo, OH
200million people paying 10 % is a lot of cash !! and the waste that goes on in big government would be reduced because they would not have the means to get more money !!

Let me guess, you were a math major?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$70.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top