Massie Lost because of What he Voted Against

[Seymour Flops]

As you know ... giant Congressional Bills are loaded with pork. Massie opposed some portions of the Bill.

Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie Stands Against Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Citing Debt Concerns

Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky was one of only two Republicans to vote against President Donald Trump's comprehensive tax and

www.thelancasterpatriot.com

He voted against all parts of the Bills. He cannot claim he was being selective. By doing so, he gave an opening to the left-leaning media to claim "bi-partisan opposition" to what Trump was elected to do.

There has never been a Congessional Bill in which all parts pleased every single member. Massie, by being the guy who always votes no, gave away all of the influence that he was supposed to wield on behalf of his constituents. That's why his constituents booted him out.

I guess they didn't realize that being loved by the Democrats is the highest recommendation for a Republican.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

That's absurd.

WTF?

If the Democrats wanted more pedos from the Epstein Files to be investigated, they could have easily done so when the Autopen had the DOJ. Publicly speaking out for that to happen would have nothing to do with the Maxwell case.

OMG.

Democrats (and so of course Massie) had zero interest in Epstein clients being prosecuted because of their Pedo in Chief, Bill Clinton being all over the Epstein Files. Once they (and Massie) had a talking point to latch onto - that Trump said he would release the Epstein Files - that took priority over protecting the Clinton legacy.

I agree.

Let's expose that scumbag, and release the remaining 3,000,000 Epstein files and put CLINTON, behind bars.

 

[Seymour Flops]

WTF?

OMG.

I agree.

Let's expose that scumbag, and release the remaining 3,000,000 Epstein files and put CLINTON, behind bars.

So the law should be changed?

It requires the withholding of some of the files.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So the law should be changed?

It requires the withholding of some of the files.

NO, it doesn't.
The LAW was passed by congress.

 

[Seymour Flops]

NO, it doesn't.
The LAW was passed by congress.

That covers a lot, especially in such a vast collection of legal documents and documents obtained through investigation. So, unless the law is changed, many files will be required to be witheld.

I'm comfortable with literally any law regarding the Epstein Files as long as it applies to everyone and is applied without partisan bias.

If you want the victims' names, photos, including explicit abuse photos, to be released, you will need to lobby your congressman to pass a law requiring that. He or she (yes, those are the only options) would need to be very precise and leave no wiggle room, since no decent law enforcement officer would want to release such material.

Same if you want classified information released, since the various intelligence agencies will fight releasing that kind of thing.

Just out of curiosity from your previous post:

Let's expose that scumbag, and release the remaining 3,000,000 Epstein files and put CLINTON, behind bars.

What prosecutable crimes do you believe the Epstein files contain evidence of that could put CLINTON behind bars?

Hypothetically, if the only way to convict CLINTON were to gain cooperation from Maxwell, should she be offered a deal?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

View attachment 1261214

That covers a lot, especially in such a vast collection of legal documents and documents obtained through investigation. So, unless the law is changed, many files will be required to be witheld.

LOL.
Trump and his regime EXPOSED victims names, not the culprits.

• The documents were unsealed under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bill signed into law by President Donald Trump. The law ordered the DOJ to make public all investigative materials, records, and communications related to Epstein.
• 
  
• Redaction Failures: While the DOJ redacted the names of alleged perpetrators in some instances, it failed to scrub the names and identifying markers of at least 43 publicly identified and anonymous victims. Some documents also included unredacted nude photographs and graphic personal details.
• 
  
• DOJ Response: The DOJ subsequently pulled thousands of the flagged documents from its public portal to apply proper redactions, calling the exposure a result of technical and human error.

I'm comfortable with literally any law regarding the Epstein Files as long as it applies to everyone and is applied without partisan bias.

Trump's DOJ?

If you want the victims' names, photos, including explicit abuse photos, to be released, you will need to lobby your congressman to pass a law requiring that. He or she (yes, those are the only options) would need to be very precise and leave no wiggle room, since no decent law enforcement officer would want to release such material.

Same if you want classified information released, since the various intelligence agencies will fight releasing that kind of thing.

Just out of curiosity from your previous post:

See above.
"Various intelligence agencies"?
Like Trump's DOJ.

What prosecutable crimes do you believe the Epstein files contain evidence of that could put CLINTON behind bars?

Release the remaining 3,000,000 files and find out.

Hypothetically, if the only way to convict CLINTON were to gain cooperation from Maxwell, should she be offered a deal?

LOL.
She already got a transfer to club fed.

 

[Seymour Flops]

LOL.
Trump and his regime EXPOSED victims names, not the culprits.

Yes, that was terrible. Likely another Trump hater not yet fired trying to make Trump look bad. But if it was a Trumper who did it, that is what happens when people are rushed.

• The documents were unsealed under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bill signed into law by President Donald Trump. The law ordered the DOJ to make public all investigative materials, records, and communications related to Epstein.
• 
  
• Redaction Failures: While the DOJ redacted the names of alleged perpetrators in some instances, it failed to scrub the names and identifying markers of at least 43 publicly identified and anonymous victims. Some documents also included unredacted nude photographs and graphic personal details.
• 
  
• DOJ Response: The DOJ subsequently pulled thousands of the flagged documents from its public portal to apply proper redactions, calling the exposure a result of technical and human error.

Yes, mistakes happen. Maybe that should have been taken into account in the rush to pass the law to release them.

Trump's DOJ?

See above.
"Various intelligence agencies"?
Like Trump's DOJ.

Release the remaining 3,000,000 files and find out.

I'm fine with that. Write your Congressman to change the law.

LOL.
She already got a transfer to club fed.

And Clinton is not on the docket yet. What else should she be offered? Or should Clinton be allowed to get off scott free rather than offer her anything?