92% reduction in the debt increase.

[Nostra]

Yes....that will cut a whopping 1% from the Federal budget.

Seek help.....

When was the last time that was done?

 

[Nostra]

Yup. That’s what Fascist authoritarian rulers do when the judiciary applies constitutional checks to their agendas.

These district judges aren’t in the Constitution, Simp. They were created by Congress.

 

[Nostra]

It is basically the renewal of Trump’s last tax cuts, which added 5 trillion to the national debt.

And if past is prologue, Trump will keep on borrowing and spending.

How did more revenue coming in add to the debt, dumbass?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Hell yes! Only 8% to go before we start reducing the debt instead of adding to it.

Trump Cuts National Debt Growth by 92 Percent

townhall.com

Exactly what I voted for is happening.

Bullshit

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Hell yes! Only 8% to go before we start reducing the debt instead of adding to it.

Trump Cuts National Debt Growth by 92 Percent

townhall.com

Exactly what I voted for is happening.

When the Government starts taking in more than it spends and continues to do so then I'll celebrate, but it's the Fed and they always find someway to fuck over the tax payer.

 

[struth]

You should never accuse anyone of not knowing so,ething. MST of your rants are fact free, not evidence based, and very frequently false.

“Further complicating matters, the Congressional Budget Office warns that permanently extending the 2017 tax cuts could add $4.6 trillion to the national debt over the next decade — a figure that has energized Democratic opposition and given pause to deficit-conscious Republicans.”

Trump's ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’ With Trillions in Tax Cuts: July 4 Deadline

Is it possible to combine taxes, border security, and energy policy into a single piece of legislation to be passed by Independence Day?

www.kiplinger.com

With a debt ceiling crisis coming up. It won’t be long at all before reality discredits Trump’s bombastic boasts.

Dembot you have no idea cause it’s not been written yet

You are an expert obvious idiot

 

[Winston]

You might be right.

First....We are ahead of where we were last year (meaning we are building debt faster). But the Government Fiscal runs October to September. So, I don't know what Biden did for four months. We need those numbers.

This was from the article:

According to a recent report, public debt rose by nearly $37 billion between January 22 and May 6. In contrast, during the same period in 2024 under Biden, the debt surged by over $478 billion. This marks a 92 percent reduction in the rate of debt growth, primarily reflecting Trump’s successful efforts to rein in federal spending through the Department of Government Efficiency.

I want that report. I want to know what they are talking about.

The report will never surface. We don't need it, we have this.

https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/mts/mts.pdf

and this,

https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/mts/mts0325.pdf

Looking at January through May

2024 2025
January 21,930,000 128,640,000
February 296,275,000 307,107,000
March 236,556,000 160,530,000
April -209,529,000
May 347,131,000

Through March 2024 554,755,000
Through March 2025 596,277,000

One explanation for those bogus numbers could be that townhall is confusing the sharp decline in the borrowing from the public column with the deficit, and there are some strange things going on that last column, "by other means".

 

[Winston]

You might be right.

First....We are ahead of where we were last year (meaning we are building debt faster). But the Government Fiscal runs October to September. So, I don't know what Biden did for four months. We need those numbers.

This was from the article:

According to a recent report, public debt rose by nearly $37 billion between January 22 and May 6. In contrast, during the same period in 2024 under Biden, the debt surged by over $478 billion. This marks a 92 percent reduction in the rate of debt growth, primarily reflecting Trump’s successful efforts to rein in federal spending through the Department of Government Efficiency.

I want that report. I want to know what they are talking about.

You can also go here,

https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/mts/budget-summary-with-adjusted-differences-report-march-2025.pdf

 

[jknowgood]

For what, enforcing the laws. I mean damn. Why the fuck do we have a Judicial branch? What the hell good is a Legislative branch. God dammit, we elected a fucking king, he can handle everything. I mean no one is more intelligent than him, according to him.

Those judges do not have the power to over rule the president.

 

[Winston]

Those judges do not have the power to over rule the president.

Founders Online: The Federalist No. 78, [28 May 1788]

The Federalist No. 78, [28 May 1788]

founders.archives.gov

This independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of those ill humours which the arts of designing men, or the influence of particular conjunctures, sometimes disseminate among the people themselves, and which, though they speedily give place to better information and more deliberate reflection, have a tendency in the mean time to occasion dangerous innovations in the government, and serious oppressions of the minor party in the community.

 

[jknowgood]

Founders Online: The Federalist No. 78, [28 May 1788]

The Federalist No. 78, [28 May 1788]

founders.archives.gov

This independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of those ill humours which the arts of designing men, or the influence of particular conjunctures, sometimes disseminate among the people themselves, and which, though they speedily give place to better information and more deliberate reflection, have a tendency in the mean time to occasion dangerous innovations in the government, and serious oppressions of the minor party in the community.

In their districts dumbass, not for the entire United States.

 

[Nostra]

Founders Online: The Federalist No. 78, [28 May 1788]

The Federalist No. 78, [28 May 1788]

founders.archives.gov

This independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of those ill humours which the arts of designing men, or the influence of particular conjunctures, sometimes disseminate among the people themselves, and which, though they speedily give place to better information and more deliberate reflection, have a tendency in the mean time to occasion dangerous innovations in the government, and serious oppressions of the minor party in the community.

The only judges the Founding Fathers put in place was the Supreme Court.

 

[Winston]

In their districts dumbass, not for the entire United States.

The power of constituting inferior courts is evidently calculated to obviate the necessity of having recourse to the supreme court, in every case of federal cognizance. It is intended to enable the national government to institute or authorise in each state or district of the United States, a tribunal competent to the determination of matters of national jurisdiction within its limits.

Founders Online: The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

founders.archives.gov

 

[Winston]

The power of constituting inferior courts is evidently calculated to obviate the necessity of having recourse to the supreme court, in every case of federal cognizance. It is intended to enable the national government to institute or authorise in each state or district of the United States, a tribunal competent to the determination of matters of national jurisdiction within its limits.

Founders Online: The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

founders.archives.gov

The only judges the Founding Fathers put in place was the Supreme Court.

Du Huh

 

[citygator]

Hell yes! Only 8% to go before we start reducing the debt instead of adding to it.

Trump Cuts National Debt Growth by 92 Percent

townhall.com

Exactly what I voted for is happening.

You my friend are likely an idiot. April tax collection drives the drop in deficit at this time and that has zero to do with Trump. Spending was up under Trump over that period. Idiocy.

As you can see below.

 

[Nostra]

The power of constituting inferior courts is evidently calculated to obviate the necessity of having recourse to the supreme court, in every case of federal cognizance. It is intended to enable the national government to institute or authorise in each state or district of the United States, a tribunal competent to the determination of matters of national jurisdiction within its limits.

Founders Online: The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

founders.archives.gov

Du Huh

Thanks for confirming my post.

 

[jknowgood]

The power of constituting inferior courts is evidently calculated to obviate the necessity of having recourse to the supreme court, in every case of federal cognizance. It is intended to enable the national government to institute or authorise in each state or district of the United States, a tribunal competent to the determination of matters of national jurisdiction within its limits.

Founders Online: The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

The Federalist No. 81, [28 May 1788]

founders.archives.gov

They don't have the power to over rule the president. They aren't kings, they rule their districts not the entire United states.

 

[citygator]

Thread fail beyond belief....

 

[citygator]

When was the last time that was done?

The budget has not been cut. We are spending way more under Trump than we did under Biden.

 

[Winston]

Thanks for confirming my post.

Evidently, you can't comprehend the bolded part.

determination of matters of national jurisdiction within its limits.