If you don't think a plane crashed there (you don't think planes were involved in NYC either), please explain the wreckage. You can't. You won't. Its your crazy theory...you just aren't man enough to back it up. I would imagine you've gone through most of your miserable life not measuring up to even the minimum requirements of manhood. Poor baby.
The problem you got corny, is you are too stupid to comprehend even the courts agree that you are batshit crazy.
You are a masochist and simply enjoy getting your ass handed to you.
n In re W.R. Grace & Co., 355 B.R. 462, 481 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006), the court held “Anecdotal evidence' means reports of one kind of event following another. Typically, the reports are obtained haphazardly or selectively, and the logic of "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" does NOT suffice to demonstrate that the first event causes the second. Consequently, while anecdotal evidence can be suggestive, it can also be quite misleading.”
what that means is your whole premise is based upon a fallacy!
The court recognized that when your premise is illogical the consequent has to be illogical.
Which means shit in shit out.
Which means you and your pals, are illogical nut cases trying jam illogical bullshit down everyones throats because none of you are smart enough to comprehend that your guv played you for fools that you are, by feeding your 'imaginations' and IMAGINE you did and continue to do, I dont.
By all means let me know when you have valid evidence to proof FLT77 was found in the P.
If you don't think a plane crashed there (you don't think planes were involved in NYC either), please explain the wreckage.
Summon some manhood for once and back up your claim.