50 potential jurors in Trump porn case already dismissed saying they COULD NOT be impartial

[Weatherman2020]

"We"

You overestimate the size of your embarrassing cult.

But you will definitely be known by history for cheering the pussy grabbing fraudster. Our grandkids will read about your cult in history class.

"Hey, like grandpa!"

Is that why you Leftards have gone full fascist and keeping people from voting for him, you know he’ll lose?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Is that why you Leftards have gone full fascist and keeping people from voting for him, you know he’ll lose?

These crybaby cult fantasies are your problem to work through, not mine.

 

[Weatherman2020]

These crybaby cult fantasies are your problem to work through, not mine.

Trump will lose so we must go full fascist and illegally keep him off all ballots!

Fascist.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I guess. Not sure how else you can do it, though.

But given 85% of your jury pool voted against Trump, it doesn't bode well for him.

The real problem Trump has is that he totally did what he's accused of.

Innocent until proven guilty be damned if its a republican, huh?

Meanwhile, our "unfit for trial" potatohead child molester president remains in office.

Two tier justice system? Nah, that's a republican talking point.

Pulling out of a jury pool where 85% of the potential jurists voted against Trump in 2020, yea, that's a fair trial.

 

[Curried Goats]

Innocent until proven guilty be damned if its a republican, huh?

Meanwhile, our "unfit for trial" potatohead child molester president remains in office.

Two tier justice system? Nah, that's a republican talking point.

Pulling out of a jury pool where 85% of the potential jurists voted against Trump in 2020, yea, that's a fair trial.

It's not a two tier justice system just because you're salty that there's no evidence to indict Biden.

 

[airplanemechanic]

It's not a two tier justice system just because you're salty that there's no evidence to indict Biden.

They never said that. They said Biden is unfit for trial. They have TONS of evidence against him. But he's too senile for trial. We know for a fact they found classified documents in a dozen different places when Biden was NEVER authorized to have these documents. Each one of those is a felony. But Mr Senile is good to go because he's too stupid for trial. But he can remain president. You can't make this shit up.

Biden can't be indicted as president, he would have to be impeached and with a senate packed full of liberal shitheads it would never happen. He'll die before he does a day in jail for his crimes.

 

[Curried Goats]

They never said that. They said Biden is unfit for trial. They have TONS of evidence against him. But he's too senile for trial. We know for a fact they found classified documents in a dozen different places when Biden was NEVER authorized to have these documents. Each one of those is a felony. But Mr Senile is good to go because he's too stupid for trial. But he can remain president. You can't make this shit up.

Biden can't be indicted as president, he would have to be impeached and with a senate packed full of liberal shitheads it would never happen. He'll die before he does a day in jail for his crimes.

One person's unprofessional opinion (that was given more context during the hearing) doesn't amount to Biden actually being senile. And you can make this shit up. You just made up this pretend argument right now.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[boevans]

airplanemechanic
Seven were seated on Tuesday, and the rest will be today and tomorrow

 

[ThisIsMe]

Lie. You jnvented a fantasy that a judge cannot be trusted to be impartial, because he gave $35 to a democrats campaign.

I think you equivocating, obtuse posters think you are clever, because you don't have the guts to say things outright.

It's not clever.

I’ve not invented anything. The story comes from CNN, which is the gold standard for news in the left wing community.

The dollar amounts aren’t the issue, it’s who they went to.

It wasn’t JUST a democrat campaign, it was Joe Biden…the opponent of Trump, and it was an organization literally called “stop republicans”. His daughter works for an organization that helps with democrat campaigns and has worked for Kamala Harris campaign.

Yes, I think that makes him biased.

Either of these facts attributed to a right wing judge would have you lefty’s screaming for recusal, and you know it.

 

[JoeB131]

Innocent until proven guilty be damned if its a republican, huh?

We all know Trump did it. Come on, guy. He fucked Daniels, he lied on business records to cover it up.

Meanwhile, our "unfit for trial" potatohead child molester president remains in office.

As he should. Considering he never molested anyone and the documents were taken by accident. The guy who looked confused was Hur, who didn't even know what was in his own report. Maybe he should have read it before he embarrassed himself in front of Congress.

Two tier justice system? Nah, that's a republican talking point.

Pulling out of a jury pool where 85% of the potential jurists voted against Trump in 2020, yea, that's a fair trial.

Anyone else who committed the crimes Trump did would be in jail by now.

If 85% of New Yorkers hate Trump, it's because they've been putting up with his bullshit for 50 years, starting with when the Nixon HUD had to sue him for housing discrimination. Seriously, how much of a racist twat do you have to be for Tricky Dick to call you out on it?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump will lose so we must go full fascist and illegally keep him off all ballots!

Fascist.

More crybaby cult fantasies. Because you can't actually argue a defense against any of the charges.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I’ve not invented anything.

You sure did. The reason you posted the CNN article was to very obviously imply bias on the part of the judge.

As usual, you don't have the guts to make your laughable claim explicitly. That's your training from yeard of watching the right wing noise machine.

You must be used to hanging around stupid people or something .

What you absolutely will not do is attempt any actual defense of Trump against the charges. Instead, we get pages and paragraphs of implied fantasies and red herrings.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They said Biden is unfit for trial.

A lie, naturally.

 

[Weatherman2020]

More crybaby cult fantasies. Because you can't actually argue a defense against any of the charges.

Nobody will vote for Trump!
We are so sure we must break the law and violate the Constitution to keep him off every ballot!

 

[Concerned American]

Nobody will vote for Trump!
We are so sure we must break the law and violate the Constitution to keep him off every ballot!

-----because cheating in the next election won't be nearly as easy to pull off as the last one was.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nobody will vote for Trump!
We are so sure we must break the law and violate the Constitution to keep him off every ballot!

I heard your embarrassing cult crybabying the first 1000 times.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I heard your embarrassing cult crybabying the first 1000 times.

Trump is unpopular!
So let’s violate the Constitution and keep him off all ballots!

 

[JoeB131]

Trump is unpopular!
So let’s violate the Constitution and keep him off all ballots!

If we followed the constitution, he wouldn't be on the ballot.

But we don't. So he will be on the ballot, and Americans will have to ask, do they really want a felon to be president.

 

[AZrailwhale]

that is what happens when you try these things in the press.

the gag orders were too little too late.

If the judge was going to order a gag order, it should have been against ALL participants and possible witnesses involved in the trial, NOT just the defendant. The prosecution has been trying Trump in the media since the charges were leaked even before the Grand Jury was empaneled.